Sidechain Compression? Possible with VST?
-
- KVRist
- 169 posts since 7 Nov, 2003 from Melbourne Australia
I've never tried this one out, I dont know how.
I know its used for deessing, but more importantly one would put a bassdrum through it to control a whole mix!
Sounds nice! How would I apply sidechain in software VST?
I use Logic 5.5.1 though the general rule will apply to most hosts.
I know its used for deessing, but more importantly one would put a bassdrum through it to control a whole mix!
Sounds nice! How would I apply sidechain in software VST?
I use Logic 5.5.1 though the general rule will apply to most hosts.
-
- KVRAF
- 7316 posts since 7 Mar, 2003
-
- Banned
- 6127 posts since 1 Apr, 2004 from Et in Arcadia Ego
Compadre Beat Puncher.
-
- KVRAF
- 6740 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from sheffield, england
No, it will only apply to "Cubase sucks" hostsMr Sleep wrote:the general rule will apply to most hosts.
- KVRAF
- 6097 posts since 5 Jul, 2001 from Just about .... there
You can do sidechaing in SX-3 using a surround group channel. You can do that now. VST3 spec that should be out shortly is supposed to support sidechaing directly within the vst structure. When that happens each vst will have to be re-written to support side-chaining directly, instead of using the aformentioned group channel method.
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer
-
- KVRer
- 5 posts since 13 Mar, 2005
the logic compressor can do sidechain compressing,
just look at the plugin window.
If you click on sidechain, you can select a source....
Kamui
just look at the plugin window.
If you click on sidechain, you can select a source....
Kamui
-
- KVRist
- 331 posts since 24 Mar, 2002 from Denmark
And we will have to shell $$$ out for updates, not least for SX4 which will cost yet another €150 for one new feature and 23478 new bugsSJ_Digriz wrote:You can do sidechaing in SX-3 using a surround group channel. You can do that now. VST3 spec that should be out shortly is supposed to support sidechaing directly within the vst structure. When that happens each vst will have to be re-written to support side-chaining directly, instead of using the aformentioned group channel method.
At least SX3 hasn't been cracked to my knowledge, so maybe I won't have to get a new dongle when I upgrade
-
- KVRist
- 415 posts since 8 Dec, 2003 from NYC (born & raised in Philly)
where did you hear this? if it's true, it's excellent news.SJ_Digriz wrote:... VST3 spec that should be out shortly is supposed to support sidechaing directly within the vst structure. ...
== chunk
- KVRAF
- 6097 posts since 5 Jul, 2001 from Just about .... there
I belong to the vst development newsgroup. It's been discussed for years and it seems as though they are finally gonna do it. I can't say it's gonna be there for sure, but I give it a 95% chance. The big thing to remember is that it will only "support" sidechain routing. It will require every developer to write the feature into each plug.citizenchunk wrote: where did you hear this? if it's true, it's excellent news.
Actually there is a ton of super sweet stuff in vst3. Enhanced GUI stuff for example. I can't wait.
I also want to say again that real sidechaining is very possible in SX-3 using the surround channel and sending the duck portion of the signal to the rear channels and the audio to the front channels. It's not hard to do.
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer
- KVRAF
- 6097 posts since 5 Jul, 2001 from Just about .... there
Nope, don't need to do any of this. Like I said above, you can sidechain using surround channels. Give it a try. The above whinney stuff is irrelivent. No hosts have all features. They never will. You will always either pay or not for the next version or maybe go with a different host or possibly take up gardening. It's up to you.Guckli wrote:And we will have to shell $$$ out for updates, not least for SX4 which will cost yet another €150 for one new feature and 23478 new bugs![]()
At least SX3 hasn't been cracked to my knowledge, so maybe I won't have to get a new dongle when I upgrade
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer
-
- KVRist
- 415 posts since 8 Dec, 2003 from NYC (born & raised in Philly)
i'm on the mailing list, but this is the first i've heard of it. has Steinberg released a press paper or something? are there any specifics yet? do they have a beta SDK? i would love to see how this is going to work.SJ_Digriz wrote:I belong to the vst development newsgroup. It's been discussed for years and it seems as though they are finally gonna do it. I can't say it's gonna be there for sure, but I give it a 95% chance. The big thing to remember is that it will only "support" sidechain routing. It will require every developer to write the feature into each plug.
== chunk
- KVRAF
- 4030 posts since 7 Sep, 2002
-
- KVRAF
- 4265 posts since 21 Oct, 2001 from my bolthole in the south pacific
Do tell SJ - will the SX3 spec change the audio format passed from plug to plug from the current 32 bit float? Does Aleksey's suggestion of flexible routing of audio signals look like getting up at some point?SJ_Digriz wrote:Actually there is a ton of super sweet stuff in vst3. Enhanced GUI stuff for example. I can't wait.
Is there anywhere we can read up on this stuff directly?
Regards,
Eg
-
- KVRAF
- 4738 posts since 20 Feb, 2004 from Gothenburg, Sweden
wtf. The VST3 spec does not need to add support for sidechaining. There's already support for that in the VST spec. It's just that some hosts are a bit.... stiff when it comes to audio handling. If a plugin supports two stereo ins, the host ought to let you route two stereo ins to it.
Stefan H Singer
https://dropshotaudio.com/
https://dropshotaudio.com/
