some simple T2 questions, please answer

Discussion about: tracktion.com
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

[DELETED]

Post

ttoz wrote:-Is it going to have better timestretching yes or friggin NO??

--Is it going to have acid project tempo wave preview?

--Has the freeze function been expanded?

thanks.
I know you'd rather hear it from an official source, but since I'm a bit of an addict and have seen most of the threads:

-Better timestretch: no.
-Acid project tempo wave preview: I don't know if I'm understanding what you're asking for, but T2 will have no Acid functionality whatsoever.
-freeze function: this one hasn't actually been discussed in any threads I'm aware of, but I wouldn't count on it.

Greg
Image

Post

more importantly, why do you care? :?

I thought you'd gone 'reason' only ttoz?

You don't even *like* Tracktion. :help:



or is there another flip-flop in the air? :hihi:
Someone shot the food. Remember: don't shoot food!

Post

[DELETED]

Post

ttoz wrote:-Is it going to have better timestretching yes or friggin NO??

--Is it going to have acid project tempo wave preview?

--Has the freeze function been expanded?
--friggin NO.

--no. :roll:

--no: its already perfect. :P

Post

[DELETED]

Post

platinumears wrote:[quote="ttoz
--no: its already perfect. :P
Yes plat, but if we could mute, solo, alter volume in freezed tracks it would be very helpful. A tractionhead here :wink:

Post

[DELETED]

Post

but to be able to do that you would have to have each track frozen to a seperate 32/64 bit file... personally i like rendering tracks better than freezing anyways.
Image

Post

ttoz wrote: is there a great demand for shocking phase retarded ts these days?
:? could I have that in english please?

Post

[DELETED]

Post

jtxx000 wrote:but to be able to do that you would have to have each track frozen to a seperate 32/64 bit file... personally i like rendering tracks better than freezing anyways.
That's what I am currently doing jtx, but I think freezing with the possibility of unfreezing is more elegant solution ( and yeah I know I can add instead of replace rendered tracks mute the original, disable the fx/synths in the original to save cpu and all that)

Post

ttoz wrote:jfoiadhf eojf iewqgf leqhfn ief iueoqlfk;??
Only on Wednesdays.
Someone shot the food. Remember: don't shoot food!

Post

zeoy wrote:
jtxx000 wrote:but to be able to do that you would have to have each track frozen to a seperate 32/64 bit file... personally i like rendering tracks better than freezing anyways.
That's what I am currently doing jtx, but I think freezing with the possibility of unfreezing is more elegant solution ( and yeah I know I can add instead of replace rendered tracks mute the original, disable the fx/synths in the original to save cpu and all that)
what i do right now is render and then copy the orginal to a different edit in the same project so i have a backup.
Image

Post

ttoz wrote:
zeoy wrote:
platinumears wrote:[quote="ttoz
--no: its already perfect. :P
Yes plat, but if we could mute, solo, alter volume in freezed tracks it would be very helpful. A tractionhead here :wink:
but didn;t you know? there';s RENDER! DOH :roll:

:hihi:
Render? what's that. I thougt YOU were asking for better freeze :hihi:

Post Reply

Return to “Tracktion”