has T2 an internal audio editor?
-
- KVRist
- 69 posts since 10 Nov, 2004 from Germany -->Erfurt
excuse my stupid question, please. But i read on the tracktion site (http://www.mackie.com/products/tracktion/index.html)
"Simple drag-and-drop audio editing"
thanks for answer.
sorry for my english
"Simple drag-and-drop audio editing"
thanks for answer.
sorry for my english
-
- KVRAF
- 6740 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from sheffield, england
T2 (and T1) offers exremely flexible non-destructive editing, which is usually the best way to do things (as you always get to change your mind later if you want!). There are also a few basic destructive operations on offer, but if you need more detailed control you can link them to an external audio editor and open files for editing via Tracktion's right-click menu.
-
- KVRist
- 453 posts since 10 Jul, 2003 from Rotterdam
i think the editing operations offered by tracktion are too meagre to be called a 'audio editor' in the usual sense of the term.. so i'd say no (unless its been improved in t2, but i dont thnk its been mentioned in the 'new features lists' (?))
in terms of non destructive timeline editing, the options are: change playback speed, cut/trim audio, add fade-in/out curves, and tracktion's special timestretch (did i miss anything?).
in terms of non destructive timeline editing, the options are: change playback speed, cut/trim audio, add fade-in/out curves, and tracktion's special timestretch (did i miss anything?).
-
- KVRAF
- 6740 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from sheffield, england
I disagree. I used Tracktion to record a whole 40 minute classical CD, with all editing done non-destructively in Tracktion. That even includes re-tuning a couple of short passing notes on the cello by 20 cents or so! So long as you stress that it is non-destructive editing on offer there is no reason not to refer to Tracktion as a powerful and flexible audio editor.cbit wrote:i think the editing operations offered by tracktion are too meagre to be called a 'audio editor' in the usual sense of the term..
-
- KVRist
- 195 posts since 31 Dec, 2004
I agree with Platniumears and would add that if you want it to be destructive, you can just render. Then its as flexable and useable as any editor (except for the crappy pitch shift that is).platinumears wrote:I disagree. I used Tracktion to record a whole 40 minute classical CD, with all editing done non-destructively in Tracktion. That even includes re-tuning a couple of short passing notes on the cello by 20 cents or so! So long as you stress that it is non-destructive editing on offer there is no reason not to refer to Tracktion as a powerful and flexible audio editor.cbit wrote:i think the editing operations offered by tracktion are too meagre to be called a 'audio editor' in the usual sense of the term..
-
- KVRAF
- 12977 posts since 29 Sep, 2003 from Ottawa, Canada
I also agree. People often get confused by the fact that there's not a drop-down menu full of processes. But you can still do the same thing, just by dropping in a plug-in to an object.
So, instead of opening Audition, applying a de-ess curve, boosting some mids, and running a compression preset, you just drop in a de-ess plug-in, an EQ plug-in, and an compressor plug-in.

Now, I'm the kind of guy who LIKES destructive editing. I like to see what happens on my waveform. Also, I use offline noise-reduction, which is trickier (or impossible?) to do properly with a plug-in.
So I like external audio editors. But that doesn't mean that most of the functions can't be done within Tracktion.
Greg
So, instead of opening Audition, applying a de-ess curve, boosting some mids, and running a compression preset, you just drop in a de-ess plug-in, an EQ plug-in, and an compressor plug-in.
Now, I'm the kind of guy who LIKES destructive editing. I like to see what happens on my waveform. Also, I use offline noise-reduction, which is trickier (or impossible?) to do properly with a plug-in.
So I like external audio editors. But that doesn't mean that most of the functions can't be done within Tracktion.
Greg
-
- KVRAF
- 1714 posts since 14 Mar, 2003 from Israel
What would make Tracktion complete in that regard is a "render clips" option. i.e. the option to render just selected clips with the filters on them, ignoring any filters on the track or master out - there's destructive editing for you (and the desired "merge audio clips" as well).
CubaseStudio4 µTonic/Rapture Nitro/GS-201/Ohmicide/TBK 1&3
-
- KVRist
- 453 posts since 10 Jul, 2003 from Rotterdam
All though its certainly possible to do alot with what's available in t..if you compare it to softs that are marketed as 'audio editors', t is lacking some important stuff, imo, particularly: pitch envelopes, decent timestretch.
(as usual, i think opinions are divided on this based on ppls different production styles.. these missing features are important to me, but i guess something like destructive pitch envelopes arent important to most T users (?))
(as usual, i think opinions are divided on this based on ppls different production styles.. these missing features are important to me, but i guess something like destructive pitch envelopes arent important to most T users (?))
-
- KVRAF
- 12977 posts since 29 Sep, 2003 from Ottawa, Canada
-
- The Teach
- 8273 posts since 23 Jul, 2002 from flatness
what counts as inexpensive greg ???Lunch Money wrote:If you can find an inexpensive editor with decent pitch and time shifting, let me know... I've been looking... not a one to be found.
slainte
-
- KVRAF
- 12977 posts since 29 Sep, 2003 from Ottawa, Canada
-
nuisance sonore nuisance sonore https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=40314
- KVRian
- 1088 posts since 11 Sep, 2004 from 45° 31' 60N 73° 28' 60W
Lunch Money, if you do get acoustica, please let us know what you think of the noise reduction and how it compare to Audition. If there's one thing I regret about selling my rx10 card is the lost of Audition with it's awesome noise reduction facilities.
Quote of the day: "If you can't answer a man's arguments, all is not lost; you can still call him vile names."--Elbert Hubbard 1856-1915
-
- KVRAF
- 6740 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from sheffield, england
Acoustica's noise reduction makes it possible for me to record a condenser mic in the same room as my PC. It can even deal with the fan noise from my guitar power amp.. worth the asking price on its own IMO. 
-
nuisance sonore nuisance sonore https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=40314
- KVRian
- 1088 posts since 11 Sep, 2004 from 45° 31' 60N 73° 28' 60W
I just tried the demo and I'm pretty impressed with the noise reduction. I would love to see a comparaison between this and the Sony's and Audition one. Maybe I should post a test file and see what peoples can come up with using different app?
Lunch Money, what don't you like about the pitch and time stretch? Seems ok here, altought personnaly I would use the Vegas one over this.
Lunch Money, what don't you like about the pitch and time stretch? Seems ok here, altought personnaly I would use the Vegas one over this.
Quote of the day: "If you can't answer a man's arguments, all is not lost; you can still call him vile names."--Elbert Hubbard 1856-1915

