T1 "peaks" above 0dB - T2 "peaks" at 0dB
-
- KVRAF
- 2565 posts since 30 Mar, 2004 from Phoenix AZ USA
Did anybody noticed?
T1 master meter "peaks" (red peak light goes on) above 0dB -- T2 meter "peaks" at 0dB
Is it OK to reach 0dB or are you suppose to be just below it?
T1 master meter "peaks" (red peak light goes on) above 0dB -- T2 meter "peaks" at 0dB
Is it OK to reach 0dB or are you suppose to be just below it?
Last edited by AndrewSimon on Sat May 07, 2005 7:37 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- KVRist
- 99 posts since 22 Mar, 2005
Clipping is consecutive peaks at 0. So if T2 is clipping at full-scale or above, that's a bit off.
- AcousticHippie
- 4769 posts since 12 Mar, 2003
well T is a bit sensetive to 0.0dB but it doesn't mean it's clipping..... as somebody already mentioned you can simply delet all track level meters put a masterlimiter with a ceiling of -0.1 (or make that -0.3) and mix happily...
it won't clip inside Tracktion anyway for it's a 32bit/64bit resolution mixer
it won't clip inside Tracktion anyway for it's a 32bit/64bit resolution mixer
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2565 posts since 30 Mar, 2004 from Phoenix AZ USA
So what is the "correct" thing to do?
Master limiter at 0dB
or master limiter at 0.1dB
Master limiter at 0dB
or master limiter at 0.1dB
-
- KVRist
- 99 posts since 22 Mar, 2005
-0.3 is generally the "correct" setting.
- AcousticHippie
- 4769 posts since 12 Mar, 2003
well actually 0.0dB is the right setting but some devices might clip getting to close to 0.000000000000000001dB and so the safety rule is -0.3dB
-
- KVRAF
- 12977 posts since 29 Sep, 2003 from Ottawa, Canada
-
- KVRAF
- 6740 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from sheffield, england
If you need to limit, then its best to keep the peaks just below full scale.. I tend to use -0.3dBFS myself.AndrewSimon wrote:So what is the "correct" thing to do?
Master limiter at 0dB
or master limiter at 0.1dB
There's nothing wrong with lowering the master fader until the mix buss stops clipping however, and if you plan to master later its a much better idea..
-
- KVRAF
- 6740 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from sheffield, england
Some DACs use 'oversampling' which invloves interpolating values in-between the actual samples. It is quite possible (esp with heavily compressed material) for these in-between samples to end up larger than full-scale.. lets be realistic anyway, whos going to notice that your tracks are 0.3dB quieter than they could be?multree wrote:well actually 0.0dB is the right setting but some devices might clip getting to close to 0.000000000000000001dB and so the safety rule is -0.3dB
- AcousticHippie
- 4769 posts since 12 Mar, 2003
yup right....platinumears wrote:If you need to limit, then its best to keep the peaks just below full scale.. I tend to use -0.3dBFS myself.AndrewSimon wrote:So what is the "correct" thing to do?
Master limiter at 0dB
or master limiter at 0.1dB
There's nothing wrong with lowering the master fader until the mix buss stops clipping however, and if you plan to master later its a much better idea..
and tracktion is pretty cool for that.... you can simply click on the master section, go to properties and then hit... adjust volume based on the loudest peak of the whole edit (or something like that - not RMS though) then export as 32bit and you'll be fine.....
but nonetheless during mixing I tend to have the W1 on the master with a 0.0dB threshold and a -0,3dB ceiling to prevent my hardware from clipping....
be sure to remove those before exporting the unmastered edit though... (even if it won't make much of a difference since the threshold is high enough - but anyway)
- AcousticHippie
- 4769 posts since 12 Mar, 2003
ah okay... didn't know that... thank god I use -0.3dB all the time thenplatinumears wrote:Some DACs use 'oversampling' which invloves interpolating values in-between the actual samples. It is quite possible (esp with heavily compressed material) for these in-between samples to end up larger than full-scale.. lets be realistic anyway, whos going to notice that your tracks are 0.3dB quieter than they could be?multree wrote:well actually 0.0dB is the right setting but some devices might clip getting to close to 0.000000000000000001dB and so the safety rule is -0.3dB
-
- KVRist
- 99 posts since 22 Mar, 2005
With oversampling limiters, as are most of the good limiters out, this is not a problem.platinumears wrote:Some DACs use 'oversampling' which invloves interpolating values in-between the actual samples. It is quite possible (esp with heavily compressed material) for these in-between samples to end up larger than full-scale.. lets be realistic anyway, whos going to notice that your tracks are 0.3dB quieter than they could be?multree wrote:well actually 0.0dB is the right setting but some devices might clip getting to close to 0.000000000000000001dB and so the safety rule is -0.3dB
-
- KVRAF
- 6740 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from sheffield, england
I prefer to make sure I have plenty of headroom, and turn my monitors up accordingly.. I find it really annoying to turn something up, and up more, and up again, and then realise I had just been hitting the compressor harder..multree wrote: but nonetheless during mixing I tend to have the W1 on the master with a 0.0dB threshold and a -0,3dB ceiling to prevent my hardware from clipping....

