Tracktion Software

.jon · Post by **.jon** » Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:09 am

Just bumping this to get an official word... this should make it to the next update... please

djsubject · Post by **djsubject** » Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:38 am

Joined: 09 Jul 2002 Posts: 666

Dont trust him!!!

djsubject · Post by **djsubject** » Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:39 am

Joined: 26 Nov 2004 Posts: 1589

i gots to get a life!

virtualsamana · Post by **virtualsamana** » Mon Jul 25, 2005 7:07 am

Good to have this forum.

I have the same problem with no count in during loop record. I thought I was going crazy as I couldn't figure out why this feature wasn't working.

Fix it!

.jon · Post by **.jon** » Mon Jul 25, 2005 7:31 am

djsubject wrote:Joined: 09 Jul 2002 Posts: 666

Dont trust him!!!

Can't believe this

I wasted my 666th post on a bump

with no mention of genitalia or hatred towards fellow forumites

and I even included pretty words

now I'll never get to hell.

(nice work on that post count, subject

keep it up!)

Btw RMS/Mackie while you're at this issue - it would be so much better if turning on loop recording wouldn't make the playhead jump to the loop region start.

Thanks & sunny days,

.jon

AD80 · Post by **AD80** » Mon Jul 25, 2005 7:36 am

pakana wrote:
Btw RMS/Mackie while you're at this issue - it would be so much better if turning on loop recording wouldn't make the playhead jump to the loop region start.

If we had that we wouldnt be in this mess. Becuase you could just put the playhead towards the end of the loop, then start recording when it goes to the begining. Thats how T1 was. The new way sucks donkey balls. I H8 it.

.jon · Post by **.jon** » Mon Jul 25, 2005 7:42 am

Yep, or then just start recording from before the loop region, and T would punch in at the region start and start looping.

I really can't work with looping as it is. Lucky I've got eXT as I've got a friggin timetable for a song, first time in my life... no time to fuuk around

djsubject · Post by **djsubject** » Mon Jul 25, 2005 7:44 am

AD80 wrote:The new way sucks donkey balls. I H8 it.

PLZ! i have pets watching

but it would be nice to have back

but i think the audio loop recording messed up the ability to do it

i wouldent want to swap back!!!

Subject

AD80 · Post by **AD80** » Mon Jul 25, 2005 8:09 am

djsubject wrote:
i wouldent want to swap back!!!

Subject

I sure would!!! It completley blows for midi now. I do probably 85% midi, 15% audio. Which means its blowing a large percentage of the time.

Besides, The singers I work with got skills. They get it right in the first or second take.

djsubject · Post by **djsubject** » Mon Jul 25, 2005 8:13 am

AD80 wrote: Besides, The singers I work with got skills. They get it right in the first or second take.

wana swap?

operandx · Post by **operandx** » Mon Jul 25, 2005 8:13 am

Beno, official line on implementing loop count-in?

AD80 · Post by **AD80** » Mon Jul 25, 2005 9:04 am

djsubject wrote:
AD80 wrote: Besides, The singers I work with got skills. They get it right in the first or second take.
wana swap?

No Way

.

Beno · Post by **Beno** » Mon Jul 25, 2005 9:28 am

operandx wrote:Beno, official line on implementing loop count-in?

I'm sure I've replyed to a different thread about this before. Yeah, of course its a good idea.
Ben

timmyo · Post by **timmyo** » Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:13 pm

Beno wrote:
operandx wrote:Beno, official line on implementing loop count-in?
I'm sure I've replyed to a different thread about this before. Yeah, of course its a good idea.
Ben

how does that translate to patches/updates ? I guess this is a general question as to 'is there a Mackie-endorsed list of features that are being worked on' ? (apologies if this has been covered elsewhere) as something being clearly a good idea and it being commited to being done are 2 very different things

ta

Tim

Tracktion Software

KVR Audio

Count in with loop record?