Need to move on from FL Studio 5.02
-
Stupid American Pig Stupid American Pig https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=4753
- KVRAF
- 7065 posts since 25 Nov, 2002 from not sure
I changed my work flow back 4 years ago when I wanted to switch to live instruments. Recording audio in FL studio just doesnt do it for me anymore, I gotta use Sonar now...
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
do you get a lot of dropouts, or is it pretty consistant?Stupid American Pig wrote:I changed my work flow back 4 years ago when I wanted to switch to live instruments. Recording audio in FL studio just doesnt do it for me anymore, I gotta use Sonar now...
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
-
- KVRAF
- 1959 posts since 10 Aug, 2004 from Valencia, Spain.
why doesn't FL do it for you for recording audio? I'm just interested, since I've used FL for everything for 2 years but recently I bought a hardware synth and I was considering whether I needed another host for audio recording tasks or not.
so what are the main reasons why you don't like FL for that and prefer Sonar?
(btw, sonar is my preferred alternative)
thx
so what are the main reasons why you don't like FL for that and prefer Sonar?
(btw, sonar is my preferred alternative)
thx
-
Left Headphone Left Headphone https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=19118
- KVRian
- 945 posts since 30 Mar, 2004
1.Mono recording
2.Track Freeze
3.Track folders
4.The Mixer
5.PDC
6.The wave is displayed whilst recording
On my pc, Sonar will drop out when the cpu meter hits 80%...
2.Track Freeze
3.Track folders
4.The Mixer
5.PDC
6.The wave is displayed whilst recording
On my pc, Sonar will drop out when the cpu meter hits 80%...
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
The biggest thing missing for recording live is the lack of an auto-punch...at least for me. AA has a much better system though, but it's hard to explain. But it isn't for punching (though the punch in is good)origami wrote:why doesn't FL do it for you for recording audio? I'm just interested, since I've used FL for everything for 2 years but recently I bought a hardware synth and I was considering whether I needed another host for audio recording tasks or not.
so what are the main reasons why you don't like FL for that and prefer Sonar?
(btw, sonar is my preferred alternative)
thx
You can put blocks for parts you want to record (just record or generate dead space). You can start anywhere but it will start recording upon reaching the clip. Of course you can have as many of these clips in the song as you need.
I make tracks for solos , verses, choruses, bridges, intros....whatever. Then I arm all those tracks for recording and it will record the parts on the proper tracks, which is nice...of course you can do just one block in one track at a time as well (and better yet hilite a larger area then the block and loop record, which will auto save multiple takes)...and auto punch naturally still is an option for fixing mistakes in the clips...
Edit

see the tracks are all armed, before these parts were recorded they were dead air blocks...but it one take from the beginning it will record in the blocks.
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
-
- KVRian
- 693 posts since 21 Oct, 2003 from Madrid
Fl is cool if you want to record simple audio parts, but as soon as you need more complicated things everything gets more comlpex for you.
For one. You can not record over time changes because of the audio streching capabilities of FL. It is great for other audio mangling uses, but recording over time changes will mess up your tune and you will not be able to mix properly since every time you stop mid song. The audio engine will Strech the audio.
It is weird. You just have to try and see what I mean. Also muting audio (and any channel for that matter) does not work properly.
I think the muting thing is being fixed in FL 6, but the audio handling will stay the same (Gol`s own words)
Still. FL is the best buy I have ever done along with EXT.
Later;
For one. You can not record over time changes because of the audio streching capabilities of FL. It is great for other audio mangling uses, but recording over time changes will mess up your tune and you will not be able to mix properly since every time you stop mid song. The audio engine will Strech the audio.
It is weird. You just have to try and see what I mean. Also muting audio (and any channel for that matter) does not work properly.
I think the muting thing is being fixed in FL 6, but the audio handling will stay the same (Gol`s own words)
Still. FL is the best buy I have ever done along with EXT.
Later;
-
Stupid American Pig Stupid American Pig https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=4753
- KVRAF
- 7065 posts since 25 Nov, 2002 from not sure
Well, the drop outs werent really a problem for me until I got up to the 8-12 track range. I wasnt too upset by this since I dont expect FL to be a multitrack recorder really. I still use it now and again for mangling loops or a change in work flow, but its just not the way I work anymore. I record guitar, bass and piano, then use jamstix for drums. I will say, however, that you can use FL studio to create a groove for Jamstix to follow by feeding a simple kick/snare pattern to the AudioM8 plugin. I have done this pretty successfully. So FL is more of a pre-production tool now for my uses.Hink wrote:do you get a lot of dropouts, or is it pretty consistant?Stupid American Pig wrote:I changed my work flow back 4 years ago when I wanted to switch to live instruments. Recording audio in FL studio just doesnt do it for me anymore, I gotta use Sonar now...
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
FL is the same for me, but to be honest 8-12 tracks before dropouts?Stupid American Pig wrote:Well, the drop outs werent really a problem for me until I got up to the 8-12 track range. I wasnt too upset by this since I dont expect FL to be a multitrack recorder really. I still use it now and again for mangling loops or a change in work flow, but its just not the way I work anymore. I record guitar, bass and piano, then use jamstix for drums. I will say, however, that you can use FL studio to create a groove for Jamstix to follow by feeding a simple kick/snare pattern to the AudioM8 plugin. I have done this pretty successfully. So FL is more of a pre-production tool now for my uses.Hink wrote:do you get a lot of dropouts, or is it pretty consistant?Stupid American Pig wrote:I changed my work flow back 4 years ago when I wanted to switch to live instruments. Recording audio in FL studio just doesnt do it for me anymore, I gotta use Sonar now...
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
-
Stupid American Pig Stupid American Pig https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=4753
- KVRAF
- 7065 posts since 25 Nov, 2002 from not sure
Naw sonar easily lets me get 60-100 tracks- its FL studio that gives me the dropouts. And by 8-12 tracks I mean 8-12 snippets...Hink wrote:FL is the same for me, but to be honest 8-12 tracks before dropouts?Stupid American Pig wrote:Well, the drop outs werent really a problem for me until I got up to the 8-12 track range. I wasnt too upset by this since I dont expect FL to be a multitrack recorder really. I still use it now and again for mangling loops or a change in work flow, but its just not the way I work anymore. I record guitar, bass and piano, then use jamstix for drums. I will say, however, that you can use FL studio to create a groove for Jamstix to follow by feeding a simple kick/snare pattern to the AudioM8 plugin. I have done this pretty successfully. So FL is more of a pre-production tool now for my uses.Hink wrote:do you get a lot of dropouts, or is it pretty consistant?Stupid American Pig wrote:I changed my work flow back 4 years ago when I wanted to switch to live instruments. Recording audio in FL studio just doesnt do it for me anymore, I gotta use Sonar now...That's why I didn't upgrade to sonar, I feared this was still a problem...
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
oh okay...I see...Stupid American Pig wrote:Naw sonar easily lets me get 60-100 tracks- its FL studio that gives me the dropouts. And by 8-12 tracks I mean 8-12 snippets...Hink wrote:FL is the same for me, but to be honest 8-12 tracks before dropouts?Stupid American Pig wrote:Well, the drop outs werent really a problem for me until I got up to the 8-12 track range. I wasnt too upset by this since I dont expect FL to be a multitrack recorder really. I still use it now and again for mangling loops or a change in work flow, but its just not the way I work anymore. I record guitar, bass and piano, then use jamstix for drums. I will say, however, that you can use FL studio to create a groove for Jamstix to follow by feeding a simple kick/snare pattern to the AudioM8 plugin. I have done this pretty successfully. So FL is more of a pre-production tool now for my uses.Hink wrote:do you get a lot of dropouts, or is it pretty consistant?Stupid American Pig wrote:I changed my work flow back 4 years ago when I wanted to switch to live instruments. Recording audio in FL studio just doesnt do it for me anymore, I gotta use Sonar now...That's why I didn't upgrade to sonar, I feared this was still a problem...
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
-
- Mighty_Musician
- 897 posts since 29 Jun, 2002 from Oklahoma
I think that fl studio is going to continue to get better, and for that reason I am not switching ever.
You can compose in studio professionally, and imho easily.
Yes the audio recording could be "better" but I have no problems recording my hardware synths through studio.
You can compose in studio professionally, and imho easily.
Yes the audio recording could be "better" but I have no problems recording my hardware synths through studio.
KVR, my adult playground.
Please, call me Brice.
Please, call me Brice.
-
- Banned
- 4073 posts since 15 Mar, 2004
Wow! That's a lot of tracks!Stupid American Pig wrote:
Naw sonar easily lets me get 60-100 tracks- its FL studio that gives me the dropouts. And by 8-12 tracks I mean 8-12 snippets...
Do you really use 60 to 100 tracks of audio running simultaneously in Sonar? Amazing!
When I used Sonar 3, I couldn't get more than 12 audio tracks to run reliably before my CPU (P4PE 3GHz) hurled the big whammy!
-
Stupid American Pig Stupid American Pig https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=4753
- KVRAF
- 7065 posts since 25 Nov, 2002 from not sure
I have only used that many a few times for a friends project. I can get by using 24 tracks or so...
-
- Banned
- 4073 posts since 15 Mar, 2004
Yeah -- I heard of some movie studio cats using upwards of 70 tracks or so for various SFX like fight scenes where you have lots of breaking glass and ambient noises, punches to the jaw and gut, whatever. But even when you record a symphony there are usually only 30 different audio feeds, so it's far from usual to need such unless you work in a heavy production house. Still, I guess some modern composers sample everything and want to shuttle/jog the various tracks here and there to see where they best fit before committing them to a mix down, etc. I reckon if I ever needed to wrap my poor head around more than 30 tracks in one go, I'd go bonkers. 