Adding filter to specific region of a clip
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 65 posts since 17 Dec, 2004 from IRELAND
Thanks Greg,Lunch Money wrote:There's nothing more audible than a continuous part immediately changing its sound.
Of course, you can make the crossfades as tiny as you want. It's just a matter of zooming in closely enough, and making the overlap only a few ms, or whatever the shortest amount allowable is for an 'auto crossfade' within T.
Mind you, at a close enough zoom, you probably won't even need to cross the fade, but it never hurts.
If you're already zooming in that close, another thing you can do is just drag your 'sliced' point to the nearest zero-crossing. It won't be 100% effective, but in many cases it'll help.
Greg
I think the auto crossfade option will do in most cases.
Dave
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 65 posts since 17 Dec, 2004 from IRELAND
Yes I could do that or split the clip at both ends and add the filter. It's trying to get a seamless transition between the cut or split section and the rest of the track is the tricky part. On loud rock music it's easier to mask transitions but occasionally I record choirs and small classical music ensembles where transitions can stand out like the proverbial sore thumd unless you are very careful. Thanks for suggestion.boogooloo1 wrote:Can't you just cut the section you want to pitch shift, put it on a new track, and insert the pitch shifter on that track?
Dave
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 65 posts since 17 Dec, 2004 from IRELAND
Thanks again. May the waveforms be with you all.
-
- KVRAF
- 10815 posts since 26 Nov, 2004 from UK
dont say that! i'm trying to lose the barstedsclassic dave wrote:May the waveforms be with you all.
i even see them in my sleep
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 65 posts since 17 Dec, 2004 from IRELAND
Point taken. How about ''may the for.. no that been used before. May all your drea...No too trite. Ok May you all live to see Tracktion develop artificial inteligence. (Scary)
-
- KVRAF
- 12977 posts since 29 Sep, 2003 from Ottawa, Canada
Well, we already have RonC 2.1, which is the latest in JUCE technology. JUCE being the code library that forms the backbone of Tracktion. RonC 2.1 is the most obvious 'next step' in the development of the platform. It has intelligent mixing abilities, a level of creativity not seen before in an AI, and exhibits signs of independence.
There are still a few bugs to be worked out, but by the time we reach RonC 3.x, I'm confident that the product will be everything it was intended to be.
Greg
There are still a few bugs to be worked out, but by the time we reach RonC 3.x, I'm confident that the product will be everything it was intended to be.
Greg
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 65 posts since 17 Dec, 2004 from IRELAND
The matrix has you!!
-
- KVRist
- 102 posts since 10 Apr, 2003 from Bed, mainly
...that reminds me, I think there should be an additional $100,000 Loebner Prize every year for the inverse of the Turing Test.Lunch Money wrote:Well, we already have RonC 2.1, which is the latest in JUCE technology. RonC 2.1 is the most obvious 'next step' in the development of the platform. It has intelligent mixing abilities, a level of creativity not seen before in an AI, and exhibits signs of independence.
This could be a great source of additional income for our Ron.
Philip
-
- KVRAF
- 12977 posts since 29 Sep, 2003 from Ottawa, Canada
-
- KVRAF
- 10815 posts since 26 Nov, 2004 from UK
RonC 2.1 chaterbot app
-
- KVRAF
- 12977 posts since 29 Sep, 2003 from Ottawa, Canada

