Once the nominations are in, we'll take a vote.
Let me begin by nominating...
Folder Tracks
What's your #1 feature request...
-
- KVRian
- 1272 posts since 11 Apr, 2002 from Nashville, TN
-
- KVRAF
- 2028 posts since 18 Mar, 2004 from New York, N.Y.
Hard to explain this functionality, I think it's called "region groups" in pro-tools:
To be able to select a region vertically across all tracks, including automation and tempo changes, then be able to cut, copy, move, and paste, and maybe even loop that region.
To be able to select a region vertically across all tracks, including automation and tempo changes, then be able to cut, copy, move, and paste, and maybe even loop that region.
Last edited by jplanet on Sat Oct 29, 2005 1:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 5268 posts since 16 May, 2002 from Brisbane , Australia
Right now I can only think of preroll for loop record.
Intel Core i7 8700K, 16gb, Windows 10 Pro, Focusrite Scarlet 6i6
-
- KVRAF
- 3420 posts since 26 Mar, 2002 from london
Yes, folder tracks is a biggy. But there's also the horrendous issue of automation not being affected by tempo changes!! If you add tempo changes existing automation gets completely misaligned. I think that clip-based automation is the solution.
Every day takes figuring out all over again how to f#ckin’ live.
-
- KVRAF
- 10815 posts since 26 Nov, 2004 from UK
snapshots, folder tracks, count in for loop mode,
take your pick i'm not fussed
Subz
take your pick i'm not fussed
Subz
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1272 posts since 11 Apr, 2002 from Nashville, TN
that seems more like a bug...chagzuki wrote:Yes, folder tracks is a biggy. But there's also the horrendous issue of automation not being affected by tempo changes!! If you add tempo changes existing automation gets completely misaligned. I think that clip-based automation is the solution.
-
- KVRAF
- 1617 posts since 2 Dec, 2003
Folder tracks, better loop record features (count in, convert multi clip into single clip, convert single clips to multi clip, and filters in midi clips (which would make it easier to do things like add delay on a section of a track).
-
- KVRAF
- 16154 posts since 2 Dec, 2003 from Nashville, TN
Na, it's not a bug. It's just the way that T handles automation. It's linked to the track instead of the clip. Clip-based automation is one of the biggest feature requests here, along with folder tracks, so I'm assuming that it will be added in time. I hope so.Rock wrote:that seems more like a bug...chagzuki wrote:Yes, folder tracks is a biggy. But there's also the horrendous issue of automation not being affected by tempo changes!! If you add tempo changes existing automation gets completely misaligned. I think that clip-based automation is the solution.
Koolkeys
My host is better than your host
-
- KVRAF
- 16154 posts since 2 Dec, 2003 from Nashville, TN
Actually better would be an option to link the automation to the clip or the track, so if you want it to stay when you move a clip, you still can.
For me, I just make sure I have the tempo set and everything recorded pretty much how I want before adding automation. But there may come a day......
Koolkeys
For me, I just make sure I have the tempo set and everything recorded pretty much how I want before adding automation. But there may come a day......
Koolkeys
My host is better than your host
-
- KVRAF
- 2750 posts since 2 Feb, 2005 from Raincoast of Grayland
I vote for T) All of the Above!
perception: the stuff reality is made of.
-
- KVRAF
- 1820 posts since 28 Mar, 2005
MIXER! go on and hate on me. i know you will.
how the heck can a mixer company (mackie) go with a software that refuses to integrate a mixer into the gui?
haha! that's always seemed strange to me. it's the one thing that turns me off to using tracktion at all. everything else is nice. so i keep it around.
by the way, im having to use cubase again at the studio. i dropped tracktion again because i can't get a client to trust my using it. what can i do? it's just a bit different for alot of people. no mixer isn't a huge help.
anyway...
how the heck can a mixer company (mackie) go with a software that refuses to integrate a mixer into the gui?
haha! that's always seemed strange to me. it's the one thing that turns me off to using tracktion at all. everything else is nice. so i keep it around.
by the way, im having to use cubase again at the studio. i dropped tracktion again because i can't get a client to trust my using it. what can i do? it's just a bit different for alot of people. no mixer isn't a huge help.
anyway...
-
- KVRAF
- 3745 posts since 29 Sep, 2002 from Killafornia
How can a Tabacco corporation sponsor anti-smoking adds? Cuz they know you addicts will keep buying them no matter what they do. No matter how bad it is for you.lharless wrote:
how the heck can a mixer company (mackie) go with a software that refuses to integrate a mixer into the gui?
.
If you want respect why are you using Cubase? The only app that is guaranteed to get respect in any high class studio is PT.
