Amplitube 2 Jimi Hendrix RELEASED this month!!!

[Meffy]

Whoa.

Thanks.




/me imagines the tension that neck must have to deal with... and marvels.

[Melodioso]

AT2 website has been updated with links to some NAMM 06 videos...

check it out!

[daGuru]

Ummm... old news.... hehe

[Melodioso]

Oooops... sorry. I have to admit, I don't read all the messages of this thread...!

[daGuru]

That'd be a mammoth task at this stage, for sure

[spuddle]

I think there are new videos actually, ones with other people using the products then just Master Fabrizio

I'm just checking it now..

[Lunch Money]

Make sure you have plenty of nice specular on that smooth wood.

Yes, it is very specularative!

I present you....TADAM!!!!!!!

The NEW and ENHANCED Super Stomp IO!!!



Worth more than a thousand picassos!!

I've taken this a step backward in technology, but have kept to the same theme. Presenting, from Lunch Money's DIY funtastic workshop: PanelStomp!



Each segment of the wonderful fake-wood paneling conceals one of 3 momentary footswitches-- 1 to my PCR-M50, and 2 to the TonePort UX2. And yes, that's my Doc Marten boot.

[VaiHalen]

Yup, the mix sounds great, VaiHalen! EXCELLENT tone, too, IMO. Then again, I seem to like most of the tones posted here. The actual "performance" of the backing track (ie. other than the guitar solo) lacks oomph. The whole thing seems about 2 or 3 bpm too slow, too.

Also, when you transition from one "take" to the next mid-solo, there needs to be a smoother cross-fade or smoother editing. You want to create the illusion that it was done in one go.

BUT, back to the tone: I think it's great. GR2 is obviously capable of good smooth solo sounds!

Thanks for your comments. I'm trying accelerate the tempo but dont know yet how to do it without making a mess. How I add oomph to the backing track? More notes in a more complex arrangement?
The solo was done in a go, I figured it out, practise two times and record; I have to play it again for the project.
I Appreciate your comments.

[Lunch Money]

That's funny, then-- there's one spot where your notes transition and I could've sworn it was a second take!

"Oomph" doesn't mean more notes or more complexity-- it just means playing with conviction. If the backing track is primarily based on a MIDI taken from the 'net, it's going to be very difficult to make it more 'lively'. That kind of thing comes from the performance, not from the engineering or the number of notes.

If all parts ARE a performance, then the answer is simple: play with more conviction!

Greg

[VaiHalen]

Yes, all is human played except drums. I'll try redo the shit!

[A3ntar]

LOL, Yes, new videos! some featuring Squiddy! AHAHA

I wonder if he mentions this thread in his presentation

http://www.ikmultimedia.com/Main.html?WNAMM06RepMov

Btw Squids, you really need a haircut man

[Guitarjeff]

Raphael rocks. The tone is so-so though. Thin in the upper registers. A Les Paul Custom doesn't generally sound that thin. It sounds better before he brings up the volume knob.


Jeff

[spuddle]

Raphael rocks. The tone is so-so though. Thin in the upper registers. A Les Paul Custom doesn't generally sound that thin. It sounds better before he brings up the volume knob.


Jeff

That's what you hear through the compression of the audio? Impressive ears there.

[Guitarjeff]

Raphael rocks. The tone is so-so though. Thin in the upper registers. A Les Paul Custom doesn't generally sound that thin. It sounds better before he brings up the volume knob.


Jeff

That's what you hear through the compression of the audio? Impressive ears there.

It's obvious. It sounded that way in person also.

But Hey, buy it if it sounds good to you. No worries here.

Jeff

[daGuru]

In case ya missed 'em... NAMM vids (finally) @ http://im0.harmony-central.com/WNAMM06/

Better than the sonicstate ones IMHO... Ya gotta check the hair too... hehe... From slickdown to 80's metal, it's all there