Midiworks wrote:I agree totaly with you.Melodioso wrote:All this sounds very promising MW, but I suggest that you don't wait too long before making "official" statement or update the website; and release some info such as release date and some pics of the new GUI... If you believe your product is way ahead of others, present it and advertise it at least as others do...Midiworks wrote:The amp will NOT be a one time wonder, but a concept that will let you xpand the amp to YOUR needs.
I tried not to talk about these things atm,
but I also didnt want to leave people too much in the dark.
I rather like to add different WahWah's over time.About the wah, it would be great to have parameters to control the Q/range and the frequency of the wah! I think you already did the classic Cry-Baby, but if you can put your hands on one of those, maybe for an update?
Its all about getting as close as possible to the real thing.
A custom Wah with Q/range and the frequency can also be added at a later time.
No, not really.cheul wrote:er... kind of a quick response here. Maybe the thin sound has something to do with the fact it is played in 1972 through a TREBLE booster (as I mentionned !). I was talking of the bite of the wah, that is to say, the aggressive action it has on the sound while the pedal is sweeping... it really has to do with the pedal (not the eq), and it wasn't a crybaby. I don't remember being able to achieve this with a crybaby (I don't have one at disposition currently).Midiworks wrote: Sounds to me like a thin-out guitar sound.(EQ)
To create those or other sound caracters,
is YOUR job, not the amp job.
TREBLE booster is cool but so old already ?
Anyway 1972 there were the same amps guitars more or less like today.
It was the sound engineer who was responsible for the final sound most of the time.
Creativity was and still is the key.
---------------------------------------------------
Win the amp !
The Website must still be done.
Rules:
Make the MAIN Soundspectral amp web page. (one page)
(including link buttons/menue to other pages.)
It should look esthetic(nice), easy for the eye.
I quite like the look of:
http://www.tc-helicon.com/
http://ag-works.net/default.asp?page=plugins.goodies
Just to give you an idea.
Please post your designs links here or PM them to me.
The design that will be used, will win and get the amp.
(the moment it is relased.)
All entries will get ONE special amp model,
that will NOT be included in the initial release.
(but can be added to it.)
So everyone making one page, can win something.
---------------------------------------------------
no offense Rene, but your last two posts seem like thinking on the fly and double talk too me...what's wrong with your web page now? It was suggested that you update it...imo it's as good or better (appearance wise)...than voxengo....and voxengo products are so good they sell themselves....the web page is just the place to buy it, as long as that works all is fine...
your page needs contact info to start, if anyone buys a pluggin from someone with no contact info then I got a few skyscrapers and a bridge or two they might want to buy.
For over a year it seems that all you said was "I" this and "I" that...then it was mentioned that when you first started you had partners...suddenly it's we
You have been telling us about it since the summer of 04, but you keep coming up with changes in course that would seem more delay in release time...you've gone off on tangents, then come back. Like Xmas tube
Remember in the AVOX thread where you said you were able to make a pluggin like AVOX? (you know that ones that are suspended on your page) There you stated it was easy to make a version in less than half an hour...though xmas tube may sound okay, it didn't have much to it....really it looks too me like it was a quickly made up sim to quiet the masses. I mean if you can create something like the AVOX pluggins in half an hour what did the xmas tube take...an hour?
I say this constructively, but your lack of consistency and lack of releasing anything but a small little pluggin, your changing course (the partner thing leaves a very bad taste in my mouth) I actually am starting to agree with CR...I think it's a fair statement to say after a year and a half "shit or get off the pot"
The "design me a free page and I'll give you a free pluggin" seems like another stall tactic. I wont even go into the fact that imo you need to own, be able to test, sample and expiriment with every model you intend on simulating (mp3s from people here as to what an amp sounds like...c'mon dude
As I said you have yet to prove yourself as a businessman, every time I look at this thread I see more examples pointing to the fact that you might not have a clue about running a business. If that isn't the case then this has scam written all over it, I prefer to believe you are an honest guy and wouldn't scam us (perhaps you partners know someone with some business sense to help you get things back on track)...so please get on with it or get over it...
Just curious on the business side...do you have a business plan, or are you just making it up as you go? How about a mission statement? Most businesses start there, with those two things...how about some pictures of you and your partners, an address for your business ("not far from" like in your profile is not good enough)...we couldn't even email you, just pm you through here. Besides xmas tube, what proof can you offer that this business exists?

