Take that, Andy.robojam wrote:By that logic Andrew Lloyd Webber is a great composer...jancivil wrote:[Igor]A great composer steals, the lesser composer borrows.[/Stravinsky]
Inadvertent Theft
- KVRAF
- 4798 posts since 14 Jun, 2004 from USA
- addled muppet weed
- 111283 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
:eek!:robojam wrote:By that logic Andrew Lloyd Webber is a great composer...jancivil wrote:[Igor]A great composer steals, the lesser composer borrows.[/Stravinsky]
- KVRAF
- 26033 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
The idea of Igor's statement is, if you STEAL something, you now own it, you have made it yours. If it sounds like your source, you've merely borrowed it.robojam wrote:By that logic Andrew Lloyd Webber is a great composer...jancivil wrote:[Igor]A great composer steals, the lesser composer borrows.[/Stravinsky]
Who did ALW even borrow from? I wouldn't know, I mean I kinda sorta remember Jesus Christ Superstar, none of his tunes there seemed too identical to anything I heard before.
AND! Is John Williams a great stealer or great borrower?
-
- KVRAF
- 21348 posts since 26 Jul, 2005 from Gone
Far too obvious to call it borrowing.jancivil wrote:Who did ALW even borrow from?
In the early days he stole from classical composers, notably Puccini and Mendelssohn, but in later years he stole from the Grateful Dead, Pink Floyd and I'm sure others that haven't heard about.
-
- KVRAF
- 1870 posts since 21 Feb, 2004 from somewhere! anywhere!
Inadvertently giving it away has always been my problem.
I still rue the day I mailed Ringo Starr a 1/4" reel to reel tape instead of the get well soon card I'd meant to send. But quite how "Yesterday" then became known as a Paul McCartney composition is anyone's guess. I expect he pinched it from the hospital bedside.
I do however recognise McCartney's creative contribution and his adaption does show a certain lyrical flair. My original was intended as a grammar exercise for those learning English as a second language, and taking the title of "The Day before Yesterday", was primarily concerned with the contrasting of past and past perfect tenses. Indeed, a brief snatch of the original lyrics does reveal McCartney's gift for phrasing when you consider the melody itself was lifted wholesale:
The day before yesterday,
All my troubles had seemed so far away.
But then yesterday it looked as though they were here to stay.
Oh I believed in the day before yesterday.
Oh well, these things happen...
I still rue the day I mailed Ringo Starr a 1/4" reel to reel tape instead of the get well soon card I'd meant to send. But quite how "Yesterday" then became known as a Paul McCartney composition is anyone's guess. I expect he pinched it from the hospital bedside.
I do however recognise McCartney's creative contribution and his adaption does show a certain lyrical flair. My original was intended as a grammar exercise for those learning English as a second language, and taking the title of "The Day before Yesterday", was primarily concerned with the contrasting of past and past perfect tenses. Indeed, a brief snatch of the original lyrics does reveal McCartney's gift for phrasing when you consider the melody itself was lifted wholesale:
The day before yesterday,
All my troubles had seemed so far away.
But then yesterday it looked as though they were here to stay.
Oh I believed in the day before yesterday.
Oh well, these things happen...
- addled muppet weed
- 111283 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
either way, he is not here to explain himself, you however are.jancivil wrote: AND! Is John Williams a great stealer or great borrower?
do you consider yourself a borrower or a stealer?
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1084 posts since 12 Sep, 2008 from Your basement
Seriously?????knockman wrote:
The day before yesterday,
All my troubles had seemed so far away.
But then yesterday it looked as though they were here to stay.
Oh I believed in the day before yesterday.
Oh well, these things happen...
-
- KVRAF
- 11839 posts since 23 Nov, 2004 from west of east
Doesn't intention play a role in these? To borrow is to give credit, to steal is to pretend it's yours?vurt wrote:either way, he is not here to explain himself, you however are.jancivil wrote: AND! Is John Williams a great stealer or great borrower?
do you consider yourself a borrower or a stealer?
We escape the trap of our own subjectivity by
perceiving neither black nor white but shades of grey
perceiving neither black nor white but shades of grey
-
- KVRAF
- 4694 posts since 25 Mar, 2006 from The city by the bay
Since old Igor's quote has been made so much of in this thread, where does the following fall in regards to using other composers' material?

To be fair, it apparently was others before Stravinsky's time who were largely responsible for incorrectly attributing certain works to Pergolesi after he died at only 26 years of age. But probably not all of it was. I think Stravinsky just mostly did what he wanted to. Sometimes stealing, borrowing, inventing "Pergolesi", etc. When you're a great composer who's paid his dues you get all kinds of license. I'm not sure how much his nice quotes will do for the rest of us, though...Much of Igor Stravinsky's ballet Pulcinella, which ostensibly reworks pieces by Pergolesi, is actually based on spurious works.
Last edited by rp314 on Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRist
- 147 posts since 28 Sep, 2009
If I recall correctly, didn't Lloyd Webber get a spanking from Pink Floyd a few years back over main riff in "Phantom of the Opera" being lifted from "Echoes"?robojam wrote:By that logic Andrew Lloyd Webber is a great composer...jancivil wrote:[Igor]A great composer steals, the lesser composer borrows.[/Stravinsky]
- addled muppet weed
- 111283 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
i guess you would have to ask someone who conciously either borrows or steals, as the intention is theirs alone.eduardo_b wrote:Doesn't intention play a role in these? To borrow is to give credit, to steal is to pretend it's yours?vurt wrote:either way, he is not here to explain himself, you however are.jancivil wrote: AND! Is John Williams a great stealer or great borrower?
do you consider yourself a borrower or a stealer?
-
- KVRAF
- 11839 posts since 23 Nov, 2004 from west of east
Well, there's also perception of intention.vurt wrote:i guess you would have to ask someone who conciously either borrows or steals, as the intention is theirs alone.eduardo_b wrote:Doesn't intention play a role in these? To borrow is to give credit, to steal is to pretend it's yours?vurt wrote:either way, he is not here to explain himself, you however are.jancivil wrote: AND! Is John Williams a great stealer or great borrower?
do you consider yourself a borrower or a stealer?
We escape the trap of our own subjectivity by
perceiving neither black nor white but shades of grey
perceiving neither black nor white but shades of grey
- addled muppet weed
- 111283 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
i always assumed the intention was "to make something that sounds good/right".
at least its the only intention i care about.
at least its the only intention i care about.
-
- KVRAF
- 21348 posts since 26 Jul, 2005 from Gone
Roger Waters said that it was an obvious rip off, but he didn't want to go through the litigation. However, he ripped ALW a new one in the lyrics to 'It's a Miracle' on 'Amused to Death':eduardo_b wrote:Doesn't intention play a role in these? To borrow is to give credit, to steal is to pretend it's yours?vurt wrote:either way, he is not here to explain himself, you however are.jancivil wrote: AND! Is John Williams a great stealer or great borrower?
do you consider yourself a borrower or a stealer?
"Lloyd-Webber's awful stuff runs for years and years and years
An earthquake hits the theatre but the operetta lingers
Then the piano lid comes down and breaks his f**king fingers
It's a miracle"
