Mixer Strip Desk

[liquidsound]

Jo, is there a possibility to envision a Mixer Strip Desk in the modular enviroment, say a MUX.
This would allow sub-mixing inside the the MuSynth or MUX (great for drum kits etc.) before reaching a Rack.
This would give more room in the Rack Desk and also it could be saved as a Preset. I know we could use the 16 parameters but it seems a waste to use the for Gain, Pan,and Width. This is much better achieved in terms of workflow by a Mixer Strip Desk.
It could popup when need it or just float inside the Play area of the MUX/MuSynth.

In Reason we can do this inside the Combinator and it is extremely handy.

What do you think?

<edit> I am aware of course that all this is available and it can be saved as it is but it is different to just have the ability to have a kind of mixer at the first level of the Play area or even better just floating in the main area when needed. I don't think a Rack here instead of the Strip would make sense since everything is done already at a modular level...<edit>

[MuTools]

Yep, i agree that's a good idea. Whether it's a rack desk or a mixerstrip desk, i think both are relevant. Will think of it some more. Added a note on the wishlist.

[liquidsound]

Yep, i agree that's a good idea. Whether it's a rack desk or a mixerstrip desk, i think both are relevant. Will think of it some more. Added a note on the wishlist.

THANKS!

[Juan Mendoza]

+1000 for this

I would like to have this implemented for the drummachine

BTW talking about racks in the MUX, while building the racks version of my drummachine i found that there's a difference of +-7% in cpu use between both versions, one has 8 racks, and the other 0, is that normal?

[liquidsound]

+1000 for this

I would like to have this implemented for the drummachine

BTW talking about racks in the MUX, while building the racks version of my drummachine i found that there's a difference of +-7% in cpu use between both versions, one has 8 racks, and the other 0, is that normal?

It was while watching your video that I realized that even though I always thought that the MUX overall, IMO, is more powerful than the Reason Combinator, the ability to load a Mixer ( EQs, Sends, Master etc) in it gave it an edge over the MUX.
The Combinator is one of the most powerful system I know to build a drum apparatus.
In your video you have challenged that status quit well my friend!

[Juan Mendoza]

Thanks

That video was recorded on the fly, without planification, i'm preparing another one, hope a much better one. Anyway i still need help to get a good sound (if you reply this, do it in the video thread )

Anyway, you can have a mixer inside the mux, with sends etc, the only problem is that is a bit of pain to open/close each rack separately. Sometimes i get shocked by the amount of windows i have floating around. The best solution for this would be what Jo suggested in another thread, to have the module controls directly avalaible from the mux deep editor.

[MuTools]

BTW talking about racks in the MUX, while building the racks version of my drummachine i found that there's a difference of +-7% in cpu use between both versions, one has 8 racks, and the other 0, is that normal?

Will check.

[MuTools]

Thanks

That video was recorded on the fly, without planification, i'm preparing another one, hope a much better one. Anyway i still need help to get a good sound (if you reply this, do it in the video thread )

Anyway, you can have a mixer inside the mux, with sends etc, the only problem is that is a bit of pain to open/close each rack separately. Sometimes i get shocked by the amount of windows i have floating around. The best solution for this would be what Jo suggested in another thread, to have the module controls directly avalaible from the mux deep editor.

Juan, i'm going to mail you about this.

[Juan Mendoza]

Juan, i'm going to mail you about this.

Mail replyed