Business ethics
- KVRAF
- 12615 posts since 7 Dec, 2004
urs; i know, it's possible. i mean though that the number of dimensions you'd need in any real system including non-linearity would be pretty big. also the error would likely build up extremely fast in such a system so it's just impractical. i shouldn't have said "impossible", it's possible as long as you're willing to give up having it work correctly 
Free plug-ins for Windows, MacOS and Linux. Xhip Synthesizer v8.0 and Xhip Effects Bundle v6.7.
The coder's credo: We believe our work is neither clever nor difficult; it is done because we thought it would be easy.
Work less; get more done.
The coder's credo: We believe our work is neither clever nor difficult; it is done because we thought it would be easy.
Work less; get more done.
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30252 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Hehe, yes, agreed
I was just bringing this example up to show that there are more ways to emulate analogue circuits than to represent each single part as a piece of code. Sometimes an abstraction is a more faithful emulation than the more obvious approach. And thus I'd argue that in some cases a little buzz may be well deserved.
I was just bringing this example up to show that there are more ways to emulate analogue circuits than to represent each single part as a piece of code. Sometimes an abstraction is a more faithful emulation than the more obvious approach. And thus I'd argue that in some cases a little buzz may be well deserved.
- KVRAF
- 12615 posts since 7 Dec, 2004
that's true, i think actually that abstraction / meta models of specific desired behaviors are a better method than direct modeling both due to the resources required and due to the results you get. a direct model may become more accurate, but only once you deal with all the issues specific to that method of modeling. a meta-model where for example you model oscillator drift by a simple approximation of the effects of oscillator frequency on component temperatures related to the changes in frequency vs. control inputs i think is a far more reasonable method to follow than attempting to individually model all the components in a specific circuit.
it is a clear lie to say that such modeling is being done; on the other hand the majority of people will have little to absolutely no understanding of what i said in my paragraph above - so for marketing purposes certain lies are simply required. they're mostly harmless - i tend to complain a lot about them - in the end though that's just what is required. not everyone actually understands technical specs, and when something like "analog model" becomes a buzz you can't expect anything but the marketing to jump all over that and take advantage in any way possible.
so, is it fair to say "analog model" when you've mixed white noise into the pitch value for an oscillator? well, no. that is what they do, though.
it is a clear lie to say that such modeling is being done; on the other hand the majority of people will have little to absolutely no understanding of what i said in my paragraph above - so for marketing purposes certain lies are simply required. they're mostly harmless - i tend to complain a lot about them - in the end though that's just what is required. not everyone actually understands technical specs, and when something like "analog model" becomes a buzz you can't expect anything but the marketing to jump all over that and take advantage in any way possible.
so, is it fair to say "analog model" when you've mixed white noise into the pitch value for an oscillator? well, no. that is what they do, though.
Free plug-ins for Windows, MacOS and Linux. Xhip Synthesizer v8.0 and Xhip Effects Bundle v6.7.
The coder's credo: We believe our work is neither clever nor difficult; it is done because we thought it would be easy.
Work less; get more done.
The coder's credo: We believe our work is neither clever nor difficult; it is done because we thought it would be easy.
Work less; get more done.
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30252 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Well, the buzzwords are mostly harmless unless a company comes and says "We're the only ones who..." or "Our approach is superior to...".
What really made me trip off recently was a company that brushed all competitors off by saying that their approach is so novel, they simply have no competition. When clearly what they claim isn't new at all (nor actually an accurate claim) and has been done by various companies before.
In that realm I noticed that some people have the ability to bash the competition by praising it. "What they do is really great, we love it. But now we have our stuff..."
Urs
What really made me trip off recently was a company that brushed all competitors off by saying that their approach is so novel, they simply have no competition. When clearly what they claim isn't new at all (nor actually an accurate claim) and has been done by various companies before.
In that realm I noticed that some people have the ability to bash the competition by praising it. "What they do is really great, we love it. But now we have our stuff..."
-
Music Engineer Music Engineer https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=15959
- KVRAF
- 4391 posts since 8 Mar, 2004 from Berlin, Germany
i consider this as a psychological trick. first praising the competition for how good they are only to state immediately later that ones own product is even much better. in this context, the initial praise for the competitor's product serves no other purpose than adding even more weight to ones own superiority. IMHO.Urs wrote:some people have the ability to bash the competition by praising it. "What they do is really great, we love it. But now we have our stuff..."
-
AdmiralQuality AdmiralQuality https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=83902
- Banned
- 6657 posts since 10 Oct, 2005 from Toronto, Canada
You are NOT going to like my marketing copy about my proprietary Binary Oxide Model ® if I ever get around to finishing and releasing the Analog Delay Tool ®. It's the B.O.M.® !Urs wrote: What really made me trip off recently was a company that brushed all competitors off by saying that their approach is so novel, they simply have no competition.
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30252 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Exactly!Robin from www.rs-met.com wrote:i consider this as a psychological trick. first praising the competition for how good they are only to state immediately later that ones own product is even much better. in this context, the initial praise for the competitor's product serves no other purpose than adding even more weight to ones own superiority. IMHO.Urs wrote:some people have the ability to bash the competition by praising it. "What they do is really great, we love it. But now we have our stuff..."
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30252 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
No worries, I'll prove that I have Prior Art WisenheimerAdmiralQuality wrote:You are NOT going to like my marketing copy about my proprietary Binary Oxide Model ® if I ever get around to finishing and releasing the Analog Delay Tool ®. It's the B.O.M.® !
-
Music Engineer Music Engineer https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=15959
- KVRAF
- 4391 posts since 8 Mar, 2004 from Berlin, Germany
...remains the hope, that people can recognize such trickeryUrs wrote:Exactly!
-
- Banned
- 18651 posts since 2 Oct, 2001 from England
there is one company/person who does this ALL the time here at KvR....Robin from www.rs-met.com wrote:i consider this as a psychological trick. first praising the competition for how good they are only to state immediately later that ones own product is even much better. in this context, the initial praise for the competitor's product serves no other purpose than adding even more weight to ones own superiority. IMHO.Urs wrote:some people have the ability to bash the competition by praising it. "What they do is really great, we love it. But now we have our stuff..."
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30252 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
-
Music Engineer Music Engineer https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=15959
- KVRAF
- 4391 posts since 8 Mar, 2004 from Berlin, Germany
me, then?Kriminal wrote: there is one company/person who does this ALL the time here at KvR....
-
AdmiralQuality AdmiralQuality https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=83902
- Banned
- 6657 posts since 10 Oct, 2005 from Toronto, Canada
Have I mentioned Urs, how much I admire and even love your pies?Urs wrote:some people have the ability to bash the competition by praising it. "What they do is really great, we love it. But now we have our stuff..."
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30252 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
(it's my wife... she does the pies... their quality that needs to be admired)AdmiralQuality wrote:Have I mentioned Urs, how much I admire and even love your pies?

