Why do you reply to my post if you decide to ignore the argument it contains?Mushy Mushy wrote:An analogy:jens wrote:It would mean you couldn't properly open older projects anymore after the rent period of certain plugins had expired. Also it would cause additional work for both the customer and the plugin-company. The idea only has disadvantages, no real advantages at all.
I decide to renovate my kitchen. For this I need a drill so I rent one from the hardware store.
I work on my kitchen for a month with the rented drill. Then for a myriad of reasons work on the kitchen stops. I return the drill.
Then a few weeks later I return working on it, and obviously need the drill again so I rent it again.
I could have either got all my drill work done initially (ie rendered), or if I still need it I re-rent it.
In your 'analogy' you use the drill once, for a certain task. When the task has been finished, the tool is not needed anymore.
If you hired a carpenter to renovate your kittchen, do you think this carpenter would use rented drills? Why not?
With plugins, the difference to your kittchen story is even bigger though (as is obvious from my argument you chose to ignore). Projects such as musical ones can be put aside at any state and for any length of time (unlike your kittchen) to be reworked/modified/finished and even re-used at any later date.
