"I have an issue . . . Diva refuses to do my laundry! I thought this plugin did it all? I feel so cheated!!!
The long DIVA thread
-
- KVRian
- 1095 posts since 12 Jan, 2011
URS wrote, "I hope so. 4 hours without a serious issue found... promising. "
I have an issue . . . Diva refuses to do my laundry! I thought this plugin did it all? I feel so cheated!!!
"I have an issue . . . Diva refuses to do my laundry! I thought this plugin did it all? I feel so cheated!!!
-
- KVRAF
- 26961 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
tommyzai wrote:URS wrote, "I hope so. 4 hours without a serious issue found... promising.
I have an issue . . . Diva refuses to do my laundry! I thought this plugin did it all? I feel so cheated!!!
What do you expect from a Diva? If you want laundry done that is what the maid is for!
-
Funkybot's Evil Twin Funkybot's Evil Twin https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=116627
- KVRAF
- 12454 posts since 16 Aug, 2006
Urs, in the old version once I'd start maxing the CPU my audio would start crackling until my DAW would freak out. With the new version, I'm not having this issue at all, at least, not until I start playing pad sounds in Divine quality. Was there something done to the way DIVA's voice handling architecture works to improve this? The new beta definitely feels like it's running a lot smoother and using less power (even if it's not).
I'll be working today recording Xmas music for some friends, but I'll either be making a purchase on this later tonight or tomorrow.
I'll be working today recording Xmas music for some friends, but I'll either be making a purchase on this later tonight or tomorrow.
-
- KVRist
- 98 posts since 4 Jun, 2010
UrsUrs wrote:The other thing is, we've planned some overall improvements (still gonna try to get multicore happening, also VST3 etc).
Does VST3 support mean that Diva will respond to individual note expression?
-
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30194 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
The new version should actually use a bit more cpu in many settings. However, it's 107 committed changes from the previous beta, I suppose a lot has changed. I also suspect that debug messages are expensive even when they're sent to Nirvana. We might start to take these out.Funkybot's Evil Twin wrote:The new beta definitely feels like it's running a lot smoother and using less power (even if it's not).
-
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30194 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Yes. We have an architectural problem that we need to address first though.atukao wrote:UrsUrs wrote:The other thing is, we've planned some overall improvements (still gonna try to get multicore happening, also VST3 etc).
Does VST3 support mean that Diva will respond to individual note expression?
We have nevertheless planned to allow ModWheel, PitchBend and some other controllers to be sent per note. On other hosts this will work per Midi channel, but basically do the same thing.
-
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30194 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
-
Echoes in the Attic Echoes in the Attic https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=180417
- KVRAF
- 12036 posts since 12 May, 2008
Noticed this too.Ingonator wrote:[
- the Jupiter 8 filter still misses a 12dB/24dB switch
Was this on purpose? Funny that the moog filter has a 12/24 switch but not the jupiter filter.
-
Funkybot's Evil Twin Funkybot's Evil Twin https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=116627
- KVRAF
- 12454 posts since 16 Aug, 2006
It's actually registering more CPU in Sonar's meter, just not destroying the audio engine on settings that would in the past. I'm not sure why or how, but it's definitely an improvement.Urs wrote:The new version should actually use a bit more cpu in many settings. However, it's 107 committed changes from the previous beta, I suppose a lot has changed. I also suspect that debug messages are expensive even when they're sent to Nirvana. We might start to take these out.Funkybot's Evil Twin wrote:The new beta definitely feels like it's running a lot smoother and using less power (even if it's not).
Glad to see multicore is still a priority. I'm guessing x64 versions will follow once everything else has been finalized?
-
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30194 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Yeah... pure stupidity on our side. We will have to add that in a .x update.Echoes in the Attic wrote:Noticed this too.Ingonator wrote:[
- the Jupiter 8 filter still misses a 12dB/24dB switch
Was this on purpose? Funny that the moog filter has a 12/24 switch but not the jupiter filter.
-
- KVRist
- 98 posts since 4 Jun, 2010
Good to hear that its coming.Urs wrote:related: VST3 some time next year then... it isn't imminent, if that was the question...
What hosts besides Cubase support VST3 Note Expression?
-
- KVRAF
- 14460 posts since 16 Feb, 2005 from Planet Earth, Somewhere
thanks for this Urs... and Howard for the initial patches.....are you still going to touch the mod page (this will look better) ?.
rsp
rsp
sound sculptist
-
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30194 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Yes, that still needs to be donezvenx wrote:thanks for this Urs... and Howard for the initial patches.....are you still going to touch the mod page (this will look better) ?.
rsp