I am glad you have a sense of humorcomo baila wrote:I see the wink, so I'll accept your comment as meant good naturedly ... so instead of 'hit and run,' why don't you elaborate on a few 'important' things what you think you can do with Maschine that you can't do with a daw and Vortex?soundklinik wrote:I'll add a useful observation: If I replaced your brains with that of a chicken, you probably would not even notice
Then I can consider whether I'd agree with you or you simply underestimate the alternative.
Let's start by saying that if Maschine doesn't include multi outputs from a multitimbral instrument, as is said above, Maschine starts at a significant disadvantage.
As far as my playing around with it goes, Maschine is just a virtual mpc where you can assemble fragments and then link them to make a song. Tell me more, pray tell?
Como
Tell me, do you own maschine?
I do, and I don't need another DAW. I use it almost exclusively as a standalone! So advantage #1
Maschine: (Standalone<>VST combo, with a hardware midi controller).
8 x audio in, and 32 x audio out. MIDI in/out. It Can send midi out to other hardware/software
16 Groups/Channels A-H, with 16 tracks each=256 tracks in total .
256 bars per track, multiply by 64 scenes = 16 384 bar song max.
Each track=(1/16th of a group) can have its own FX- native or VST, Group can have FX and 15 channels can have master FX in 16th channel.
It hosts VSTs, it samples(re-samples) from inside and outside, you can load samples, you can record tweaks, into audio and bounce the result on another channel or track without even stopping Maschine...
Do I need to go on? Do you realize the difference?
Can we stop comparing different products with Vortex, so the forum does not degenerate into stupidity?
