Razor is still, as a once famous street-savvy producer said - "Wicked"
- Banned
- 4491 posts since 8 Jul, 2008 from UK
Because it doesn't conform to the normal VST behaviour, Razor is a bit of an untapped goldmine, bit like scanned synth pro.
Don't trust those with words of weakness, they are the most aggressive
-
- KVRAF
- 42529 posts since 21 Dec, 2005
The say it's not a bug
But how can that be. When on "hertz" if you play a chord and it's not dead-on, or hit another note, the LFO is on. If you use "beat", and you are not dead on, it sounds out of whack. AND if you hit an additional note, it's LFO is different than than the original notes 
How can this be "normal" behavior
?
How can this be "normal" behavior
- KVRAF
- 14123 posts since 20 Nov, 2003 from Lost and Spaced
I think the LFO may be tied to note, so the higher the note the faster it will oscillate. Maybe a polyphonic LFO.... Have to give the manual a read.
-
- KVRAF
- 3817 posts since 8 Mar, 2006
Just bought it! 
Unique and fun to play with!
A bit CPU hungry (high quality mode) with "fairly" limited flexibility. (the cool stuff kinda makes up for it - but still.. who doesn't want to modulate the envelope times or the LFO speed for example?
)
Some extreme settings makes it sound a bit nasty, in that case, try the random phase knob.. you can't miss it!
(that, if readjusting the envelopes, the phase and switching to a higher quality mode doesn't do the trick)
..and btw, just found out that one can save fxp settings with the Reaktor Player... but only after registering Razor.
A bit annoying I know, but it's a workaround!
Unique and fun to play with!
A bit CPU hungry (high quality mode) with "fairly" limited flexibility. (the cool stuff kinda makes up for it - but still.. who doesn't want to modulate the envelope times or the LFO speed for example?
Some extreme settings makes it sound a bit nasty, in that case, try the random phase knob.. you can't miss it!
..and btw, just found out that one can save fxp settings with the Reaktor Player... but only after registering Razor.
A bit annoying I know, but it's a workaround!
- KVRAF
- 4083 posts since 29 Jun, 2011 from USA
So do we have a conclusion to this question?
Can we reliably save our presets on Razor without buying Reaktor? I would love to work on a bank for example. But if it's going to be hit and miss I won't be able to...
Can we reliably save our presets on Razor without buying Reaktor? I would love to work on a bank for example. But if it's going to be hit and miss I won't be able to...
Aiynzahev-sounds
Sound Designer - Soundsets for Pigments, Repro, Diva, Virus TI, Nord Lead 4, Serum, DUNE2, Spire, and others
Sound Designer - Soundsets for Pigments, Repro, Diva, Virus TI, Nord Lead 4, Serum, DUNE2, Spire, and others
-
- KVRian
- 657 posts since 2 May, 2002 from Kalispell, MT
I just gave it a go and I say yes, you can absolutely save and load presets. Most recent versions of Reaktor player and Razor installed.Aiynzahev wrote:So do we have a conclusion to this question?
Can we reliably save our presets on Razor without buying Reaktor? I would love to work on a bank for example. But if it's going to be hit and miss I won't be able to...
-
- KVRist
- 338 posts since 28 Jul, 2004 from near Düsseldorf, Germany
What is so special about Razor? Is there anything it can do better than Massive or Absynth (i already have NI Komplete)?
Last edited by juffi on Wed Jun 20, 2012 6:54 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 42529 posts since 21 Dec, 2005
Well, sound wise, it's pretty f/n thick. I think quite a bit thicker/fuller than massive tbh. I'm just p/oed about the LFO "hertz" VS "beat" thing not working properly.juffi wrote:What is so special about Razor? Is there anything it can do better than Massive or Absynth (i already NI Komplete)?
It's really difficult to explain though. I have the macprovideo "how to" and a groove three pass (they do massive) and razor just has a much fuller sound (even from the start) It's pretty cpu intensive though, I think more so than massive.
-
- KVRist
- 338 posts since 28 Jul, 2004 from near Düsseldorf, Germany
I fear it is the same with massive, so harsh and rather cold sounding, sort of big and mean wavestation. Is it just me who misses something like a pro-53 in NI collections?hibidy wrote:Well, sound wise, it's pretty f/n thick. I think quite a bit thicker/fuller than massive tbh. I'm just p/oed about the LFO "hertz" VS "beat" thing not working properly.juffi wrote:What is so special about Razor? Is there anything it can do better than Massive or Absynth (i already NI Komplete)?
It's really difficult to explain though. I have the macprovideo "how to" and a groove three pass (they do massive) and razor just has a much fuller sound (even from the start) It's pretty cpu intensive though, I think more so than massive.
-
- KVRer
- 17 posts since 22 Feb, 2012 from Suomi
About Razor being cold, harsh and not sitting well in a mix. I think it clearly sounds digital but I also think it in general sits well in mixes.
Since I have a day off, I spent some 30 minutes and made a short demo clip using a couple of instances of Razor, Sylenth1 and Diva together with some loops. No eQ, no effects and no mastering. Mixing was done in matter of minutes so it's far from perfect. There is muddiness of course without any use of eQ and sounds just being picked out of factory presets or my own previously made presets. All that being said. I feel that Razor sits there quite nice, even with Diva.
http://soundcloud.com/m-d-m-k/project-e ... -demo-clip
Since I have a day off, I spent some 30 minutes and made a short demo clip using a couple of instances of Razor, Sylenth1 and Diva together with some loops. No eQ, no effects and no mastering. Mixing was done in matter of minutes so it's far from perfect. There is muddiness of course without any use of eQ and sounds just being picked out of factory presets or my own previously made presets. All that being said. I feel that Razor sits there quite nice, even with Diva.
http://soundcloud.com/m-d-m-k/project-e ... -demo-clip
-
- KVRist
- 338 posts since 28 Jul, 2004 from near Düsseldorf, Germany
Nice jam demo!MDMK wrote:About Razor being cold, harsh and not sitting well in a mix. I think it clearly sounds digital but I also think it in general sits well in mixes.
Since I have a day off, I spent some 30 minutes and made a short demo clip using a couple of instances of Razor, Sylenth1 and Diva together with some loops. No eQ, no effects and no mastering. Mixing was done in matter of minutes so it's far from perfect. There is muddiness of course without any use of eQ and sounds just being picked out of factory presets or my own previously made presets. All that being said. I feel that Razor sits there quite nice, even with Diva.
http://soundcloud.com/m-d-m-k/project-e ... -demo-clip
-
- KVRAF
- 3817 posts since 8 Mar, 2006
Dunno how "reliably", I just did a quick test in FL Studio 10 and it worked... patch loaded! Although I suspect that if one starts to do a bank, it won't have more presets than the actual factory bank ...about 352 was it? .. with Reaktor Player of course.Aiynzahev wrote:So do we have a conclusion to this question?
Can we reliably save our presets on Razor without buying Reaktor? I would love to work on a bank for example. But if it's going to be hit and miss I won't be able to...
Added: Another way you can save presets.
I have version 5.6.2 of Reaktor Player running v. 1.2.0 of Razor, and there are options to save and load presets under the File drop-down menu. So you can save as many as you like.
I don't know who mentioned that it sounded harsh but I disagree.About Razor being cold, harsh and not sitting well in a mix.
It does sound digital and bright in some cases but in a good way.
Instead of "harsh" , sometimes it has artifacts which sound like a combination of aliasing and sample rate "jitter" but it can be tamed quickly...
So far, I see it as an opposite of Diva in character!
Razor simply sounds different with it's own "digital" (in a good way) sound quality.What is so special about Razor? Is there anything it can do better than Massive or Absynth (i already have NI Komplete)?
I find Massive to sound OK, but I never really liked it's sound...
What's special about it? It's features.. it's a different experience altogether.
Last edited by 3ee on Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- KVRAF
- 14123 posts since 20 Nov, 2003 from Lost and Spaced
All I know is there are pad patches where I could play a C 2 note and it sounds very clear and big. Not too many synths can play a note that low and not sound distorted or just plain bad. There is an update. I know the link I got was for v1.10, but when I ran NI Service Center it downloaded v 1.20.
I did look at the manual yesterday , and the LFO's are mono, don't retrigger , and are made to do weird offbeat things. If you sync 1 with 2 it can get weirder.
Is there an FX version of Razor? I haven't even tried the vocoder and would love not having the hassle of linking the input to the soundcard. Wouldn't that mean everything coming into the soundcard gets passed through?
Would also love to be able to use as an FX because the Chorus and the Reverbs are humdingers.
Razor FX NI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I did look at the manual yesterday , and the LFO's are mono, don't retrigger , and are made to do weird offbeat things. If you sync 1 with 2 it can get weirder.
Is there an FX version of Razor? I haven't even tried the vocoder and would love not having the hassle of linking the input to the soundcard. Wouldn't that mean everything coming into the soundcard gets passed through?
Would also love to be able to use as an FX because the Chorus and the Reverbs are humdingers.
Razor FX NI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
