But...will it sound like a Virus?Urs wrote:That really is just half of it... not even(and yes, we might need longer than 6 months from now)
/me runs away before the tomatoes are thrown
mseg , and beyond ...
-
- KVRAF
- 4141 posts since 11 Aug, 2006 from Texas
/me runs away before the tomatoes are thrown
-
- KVRAF
- 5234 posts since 25 Feb, 2008
Fwiw, a few requests for spectroblend:
More partials.
Control over the number of partials.
Partial bending, linear + parabolic (see Reaktor's Sine Bank and Prism's Modal Bank).
Something like Prism's assigning of A/B partials + A/B Balance + Shift.
More partials.
Control over the number of partials.
Partial bending, linear + parabolic (see Reaktor's Sine Bank and Prism's Modal Bank).
Something like Prism's assigning of A/B partials + A/B Balance + Shift.
-
- KVRian
- 1112 posts since 26 Jun, 2008 from Czech Republic
For me, just little zoom for Spectroblend would be awesome. Like in ModMappers, just to be able to grab those harmonics more precise.
-
- KVRAF
- 5223 posts since 20 Jul, 2010
Being able to put a mask on the odd and even harmonics or something functionally equivalent would be very nice. Maybe even some simple procedural widget that can freeze every nth partial from editing, or create a repeating mask that loops. That would certainly make it a lot easier to get away from "filtered sawtooth" sounds.
A lot of my spectroblend waveforms have been based on missing a certain number of harmonics and then editing one, then repeating while varying something, or other very simple repeating patterns. These create some really interesting progressions, but the editing process is bordering on painful and frustrating
. Often one mis-click can mess up a whole bunch of partials.
In fact, a few people have asked me if I used a computer program to create these wavetables. No, I just am that hellbent on doing science.
A lot of my spectroblend waveforms have been based on missing a certain number of harmonics and then editing one, then repeating while varying something, or other very simple repeating patterns. These create some really interesting progressions, but the editing process is bordering on painful and frustrating
. Often one mis-click can mess up a whole bunch of partials.In fact, a few people have asked me if I used a computer program to create these wavetables. No, I just am that hellbent on doing science.
http://sendy.bandcamp.com/releases < My new album at Bandcamp! Now pay what you like!
-
- KVRist
- 431 posts since 27 Sep, 2005
Phase editor for harmonic partials needed mostly in the case of spectra2geo and vice versa conversions. And I personally think that such conversions would be handy. And also fabulous blend2geo conversions, although it is an AI territory (discrete data vectorizations and other). But it is not so rare task for modern computing applications.
-
- KVRist
- 293 posts since 18 Jul, 2003
Sounds like a great plan! I'm glad to hear you're going in this direction...Urs wrote: Our inspiration mostly stems from the idea of unifying OSC waveforms, MSEGs, ModMappers, custom LFO waves into the same single thing with curve/freehand modes, drag'n'drop support back and forth, sample conversion and a set of unified, useful editing tools.
-
- KVRAF
- 10171 posts since 2 Jan, 2005 from somewhere in the woods
bmrzycki wrote:But...will it sound like a Virus?
Sendy wrote:Being able to put a mask on the odd and even harmonics or something functionally equivalent would be very nice.
"It dreamed itself along"
-
- KVRian
- 1067 posts since 28 Dec, 2004
+1Urs wrote:
Our new meta controls will have additional controls for Decay (optional) and Loop level. They don't actually change the envelope itself, they're non-destructive and can be modulated.
...inserting a point anywhere in a segment won't break the segment's curvature.
Perfect! And +1 Anything with spectroblend.
Great plans!
Cheers
