DX7 Data-Sheets > Zebra?
- u-he
- 30188 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Yep, holiday is fine. But whenever wife hits a store for fashion, shoes, bags or jewelry I'm happy to sit down on a bench and do some ipad 
-
Bronto Scorpio Bronto Scorpio https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=98170
- KVRAF
- 5546 posts since 13 Feb, 2006 from Wiesmoor, Germany
Awesome! Thanks for that! We really should have thought of that thoughUrs wrote:Well, hehe, I guess all algorithms can be done if feedback is set to zero.
But here it comes: Where feedback isn't set to zero and spans only a single oscillator, use a normal oscillator with spectroblend sine. Use "Scrambler" as OscFX, which is plain simple (but antialiased) FM feedback on the wavetable. Should deliver pretty good results with Resolution around 7 to 8
So here you go, all but 2 algorithms
Cheers
Dennis
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 5234 posts since 25 Feb, 2008
Any ideas about:
1. DX EG rate > Zebra envelope setting conversion.
2. DX FEEDBACK levels (1 to 7) > FMO (self feedback) FM Amount conversion.
3. DX Modulator into Carrier > Zebra FM amount conversion.
4. DX LFO rate and pitch/amplitude modulation depth > Zebra LFO conversion.
5. ...?
1. DX EG rate > Zebra envelope setting conversion.
2. DX FEEDBACK levels (1 to 7) > FMO (self feedback) FM Amount conversion.
3. DX Modulator into Carrier > Zebra FM amount conversion.
4. DX LFO rate and pitch/amplitude modulation depth > Zebra LFO conversion.
5. ...?
- KVRAF
- 4197 posts since 23 May, 2004 from Bad Vilbel, Germany
I think all the ones where the feedback doesn't span two or three operators are possible because you can use an OSC instead. So I reckon 4 and 6 are the only truly impossible algorithms.hakey wrote:Edit: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 19, 21, 22 aren't possible. Any more?
EDIT: Damn, that Urs bloke beat me to it
Interesting thread, BTW!
-
- KVRian
- 743 posts since 14 Apr, 2004
A classic experienced!Urs wrote:Yep, holiday is fine. But whenever wife hits a store for fashion, shoes, bags or jewelry I'm happy to sit down on a bench and do some ipad
- KVRian
- 1067 posts since 28 Dec, 2004
Just realised, the example in the link is not E-Piano1.hakey wrote:Anyone tried translating DX7 data-sheets into Zebra?
It's Fulltines. It was suspicious for me: it was much brighter
than E-Piano1.
So it is E-Piano1 or Fulltines the most wanted Dx piano sound?
- KVRian
- 1067 posts since 28 Dec, 2004
Finally i made a patch for Zebra: the infamous DX7 E-Piano 1. 
Here you can check the Original (iron) Dx7 : with a bit of much
velocity. I had to choose between the dx7 keyboard or my Roland
A90. From the A90 is a bit overdose the Dx velo, but if i would
play the dx keyboard then the FM7 and the Zebra would be too flat. So i scale it down just under 100 the hi velocity notes for the first track.
Still is a bit harder.
All of the 3 track is totally dry and mono. (like the Dx7 was)
Dx7 E-Piano 1
http://www.sound.artenuovo.com/Dx7Epiano1.mp3
FM7 E-Piano 1
http://www.sound.artenuovo.com/FM7Epiano1.mp3
Zebra E-Piano 1
http://www.sound.artenuovo.com/ZebraEpiano1.mp3
What do you think?
Cheers,
Joseph
Here you can check the Original (iron) Dx7 : with a bit of much
velocity. I had to choose between the dx7 keyboard or my Roland
A90. From the A90 is a bit overdose the Dx velo, but if i would
play the dx keyboard then the FM7 and the Zebra would be too flat. So i scale it down just under 100 the hi velocity notes for the first track.
Still is a bit harder.
All of the 3 track is totally dry and mono. (like the Dx7 was)
Dx7 E-Piano 1
http://www.sound.artenuovo.com/Dx7Epiano1.mp3
FM7 E-Piano 1
http://www.sound.artenuovo.com/FM7Epiano1.mp3
Zebra E-Piano 1
http://www.sound.artenuovo.com/ZebraEpiano1.mp3
What do you think?
Cheers,
Joseph
-
- KVRist
- 293 posts since 18 Jul, 2003
Sounds nice. Definitely much nicer and closer than the FM7 version which seems slightly brittle compared to the other two. Really great work!hollo wrote: What do you think?
Both the FM7 and Zebra versions have a fuller, slightly muddy low-mid / bass compared to the Dx7 although that could be partly due to the headphones I'm listening on. They also have less brightness / sheen / sparkle. If you keep working on it I suggest focusing on these areas. This is where that little bit extra lies that gives the original Dx7 patch it's magic imho.
- KVRAF
- 26941 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
hollo wrote:
What do you think?
I think that the DX7 one has a better high end... it has a complexity and zest I like. Of the other 2 I like the Zebra one a bit better than the FM7 version. The DX is clearly better to me (imo)
-
- KVRist
- 293 posts since 18 Jul, 2003
Agree. This is the sparkle I was describing. I do think the difference between your Zebra patch and FM7 is more than just a bit better though...pdxindy wrote:hollo wrote:
What do you think?
I think that the DX7 one has a better high end... it has a complexity and zest I like. Of the other 2 I like the Zebra one a bit better than the FM7 version. The DX is clearly better to me (imo)
- KVRian
- 1067 posts since 28 Dec, 2004
+1 for both of yourockin1 wrote:Agree. This is the sparkle I was describing. I do think the difference between your Zebra patch and FM7 is more than just a bit better though...pdxindy wrote:hollo wrote:
What do you think?
I think that the DX7 one has a better high end... it has a complexity and zest I like. Of the other 2 I like the Zebra one a bit better than the FM7 version. The DX is clearly better to me (imo)
About the sparkle: i told about the Dx got more velocity
because of the Roland keyboard. So it's shining more than it's
normally with it's own keyboard.
The Zebra patch is doing much more well, dont forget it's mono
and dry: would need a little Eq cut for the muddiness and just a bit more velo to keep up with the Dx. It's really playable
and dynamic. Funny: the osc volume is only 4 on the sparkle part.
- KVRAF
- 4141 posts since 11 Aug, 2006 from Texas
I like the creamyness? of the Zebra sound -- I find it to be very smooth. It just needs a little more brightness for my taste. Of course it sounds like you're already working to fix that. Even so, it's a very close recreation of the original sound, I doubt I would have heard the difference if it wasn't a soloed piece and was in the mix.hollo wrote:The Zebra patch is doing much more well, dont forget it's mono
and dry: would need a little Eq cut for the muddiness and just a bit more velo to keep up with the Dx. It's really playable
and dynamic. Funny: the osc volume is only 4 on the sparkle part.
- KVRAF
- 26941 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
rockin1 wrote:Agree. This is the sparkle I was describing. I do think the difference between your Zebra patch and FM7 is more than just a bit better though...pdxindy wrote:hollo wrote:
What do you think?
I think that the DX7 one has a better high end... it has a complexity and zest I like. Of the other 2 I like the Zebra one a bit better than the FM7 version. The DX is clearly better to me (imo)
Not my patch, but yes, the FM7 version is clearly weakest... the highs on the FM7 version at times sound sine-y, lacking in a suitable complexity.
After I got ACE along with Zebra, I found them to make better FM type sounds than FM7/8 (at least as I used it)... That was when I took FM8 off my computer. Bazille also does some very nice DX type sounds...
- KVRist
- 63 posts since 26 Jan, 2011 from Berlin, Germany
Mhhhh...love that sound.
Maybe missing a bit of that 'body' of the original DX sound
in the Zebra patch, otherwise it sounds pretty good!
Was reading somewhere Urs planned to put some more fm love into Zebra(3),
really curious how it turns out!
Maybe missing a bit of that 'body' of the original DX sound
in the Zebra patch, otherwise it sounds pretty good!
Was reading somewhere Urs planned to put some more fm love into Zebra(3),
really curious how it turns out!
I dont know, man...I just got here meself!
