Oberheim Diva?
-
aaron aardvark aaron aardvark https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=248508
- KVRAF
- 3077 posts since 22 Jan, 2011 from near Los Angeles
I just googled Hans Zimmer CS-80, and something popped up about Zimmer using the CS-80 a lot. I wonder if........
You can hear my original music at this link: https://www.soundclick.com/artist/defau ... dID=224436
-
- KVRian
- 588 posts since 3 Oct, 2011
My V-Collection would go right up on the marketplace. I would love to get the CS-80 sound without Arturia's wretched f$*&ing interface.V0RT3X wrote:UHE Should do modules from
Yamaha CS-80
SCI Prophet 5
Oberheim SEM
A.R.P Odyssey
This would pretty much KILL off other emulations on the market
- KVRAF
- 20889 posts since 22 Nov, 2000 from Southern California
+1eXode wrote:I'm going to be a bit anal and say:
SCI Prophet 5 rev. 2 and not 3!
+1 on both CS80, SEM and Odyssey!
- u-he
- 30222 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Guys!
Hehehe, yes, a CS-80 is around, and so are OB-X, possibly a Synthex, possibly a P5 V2, even parts of an Arp 2500. We have Synthacon filters, TB-303 filters, Synthi stuff, Polyvoks.
Nonetheless, this stuff ain't easy. We need time and we currently have our brains full of effects and zebras.
The CS is particularly weird to model because it's character is defined by the hardware control (Ribbon, PolyAT) to a large extent. No software will ever come close without corresponding hardware, at least on the performance side...
Hehehe, yes, a CS-80 is around, and so are OB-X, possibly a Synthex, possibly a P5 V2, even parts of an Arp 2500. We have Synthacon filters, TB-303 filters, Synthi stuff, Polyvoks.
Nonetheless, this stuff ain't easy. We need time and we currently have our brains full of effects and zebras.
The CS is particularly weird to model because it's character is defined by the hardware control (Ribbon, PolyAT) to a large extent. No software will ever come close without corresponding hardware, at least on the performance side...
- KVRAF
- 3878 posts since 28 Jun, 2009 from Wherever I lay my hat
That's okay, keep your mind on the Zebra... Zebra... Zebra....


-
- KVRian
- 588 posts since 3 Oct, 2011
OMG U-He's getting into hardware now! I'm going to go start 17 threads about it...Urs wrote:
The CS is particularly weird to model because it's character is defined by the hardware control (Ribbon, PolyAT) to a large extent. No software will ever come close without corresponding hardware, at least on the performance side...
- KVRAF
- 20889 posts since 22 Nov, 2000 from Southern California
LOL!Nanakai wrote:OMG U-He's getting into hardware now! I'm going to go start 17 threads about it...
-
aaron aardvark aaron aardvark https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=248508
- KVRAF
- 3077 posts since 22 Jan, 2011 from near Los Angeles
Urs,
Sounds great! I know this stuff takes time, though I'm still anxious to hear how it turns out!

Sounds great! I know this stuff takes time, though I'm still anxious to hear how it turns out!
-
- KVRian
- 873 posts since 26 Aug, 2005 from Oregon, USA
I would be happy if we just got the Jupiter-4 oscillators and filters into Diva.
- KVRAF
- 20889 posts since 22 Nov, 2000 from Southern California
It isn't on the list of synths Urs mentioned above as having access to. For that matter, if the only Oberheim he has access to is an OB-X, I'd rather see the Prophet 5 V2 get added first.ksandvik wrote:I would be happy if we just got the Jupiter-4 oscillators and filters into Diva.
- u-he
- 30222 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Well, the OB-X has the original SEM filters based on CA3080 OTAs. Later models (OB-Xa, OB-8) use Curtis chips, which we have covered with a Matrix 12.Uncle E wrote:It isn't on the list of synths Urs mentioned above as having access to. For that matter, if the only Oberheim he has access to is an OB-X, I'd rather see the Prophet 5 V2 get added first.ksandvik wrote:I would be happy if we just got the Jupiter-4 oscillators and filters into Diva.
-
feeltheillinois feeltheillinois https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=284631
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 22 posts since 21 Jul, 2012 from United Kingdom
Wow! Seems there is a lot of interest in this. That's fantastic. I'm in favour of OB-X firstly can I just say.
The Prophet is cool but you can buy Dave Smith stuff today. Its in production. In fact I have a Prophet 08. Love it to bits. I'm sorry I can't compare it to the Prophet 5 v2, since I've never owned this synth, but the 08 is brilliant.
The CS-80 is rather nice yes but my vote is still for the Oberheim. The SEM I've not owned but lots of people have lots of nice things to say about it. I thought it was monophonic though?
I have, on the other hand, heard the OB-X and its one of the nicest synthesisers I've heard. Between the Diva, my Prophet 08 and the Tempest the only thing I'd like to add is an Oberheim and I'd love it if Urs and the U-he team would be so kind as to model one since the originals are 5k USD + and rather large/heavy. I love the Diva. Its become my go-to instrument because its so accessible and sounds as good as any of my analogues to my ears. Just would love to add 1x oberheim to it for all those ghostly strings and pads
.
So how many goldfish will I have to sacrifice to get U-he to bless the OB-X with their very special software treatment? (keep in mind I live in newcastle upon tyne and over here we haven't anything to look forward to other than this kind of stuff :p ).
Cheers!
The Prophet is cool but you can buy Dave Smith stuff today. Its in production. In fact I have a Prophet 08. Love it to bits. I'm sorry I can't compare it to the Prophet 5 v2, since I've never owned this synth, but the 08 is brilliant.
The CS-80 is rather nice yes but my vote is still for the Oberheim. The SEM I've not owned but lots of people have lots of nice things to say about it. I thought it was monophonic though?
I have, on the other hand, heard the OB-X and its one of the nicest synthesisers I've heard. Between the Diva, my Prophet 08 and the Tempest the only thing I'd like to add is an Oberheim and I'd love it if Urs and the U-he team would be so kind as to model one since the originals are 5k USD + and rather large/heavy. I love the Diva. Its become my go-to instrument because its so accessible and sounds as good as any of my analogues to my ears. Just would love to add 1x oberheim to it for all those ghostly strings and pads
So how many goldfish will I have to sacrifice to get U-he to bless the OB-X with their very special software treatment? (keep in mind I live in newcastle upon tyne and over here we haven't anything to look forward to other than this kind of stuff :p ).
Cheers!
- KVRAF
- 20889 posts since 22 Nov, 2000 from Southern California
You know, the world's most coveted guitar compressor pedals (Ross, Keeley, etc.) are also based on CA3080 OTA's. Maybe it's time to take your knowledge beyond synths?Urs wrote:Well, the OB-X has the original SEM filters based on CA3080 OTAs.
- KVRAF
- 3540 posts since 1 Oct, 2006 from Um! Where is this?
Ok that's fine,as long as you've got it all done by this weekendUrs wrote: Nonetheless, this stuff ain't easy. We need time and we currently have our brains full of effects and zebras.
- u-he
- 30222 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Nah, it's gonna be *that* weekend. We just don't know which year yet.Resonator63 wrote:Ok that's fine,as long as you've got it all done by this weekendUrs wrote: Nonetheless, this stuff ain't easy. We need time and we currently have our brains full of effects and zebras.
