MuTools

> DiGiT < · Post by **> DiGiT <** » Fri Nov 30, 2012 7:31 pm

mux would need to make up connections where appropriate... say for instance if your track pointed to musynth and the out put of musynth went into an echo and then more modules etc, if that chain of modules isnt wrapped in a mux then cloning would make another musynth and plug it into the same echo module? i guess that could work.

pljones · Post by **pljones** » Fri Nov 30, 2012 7:37 pm

Also, this really only works with track-level targeting. If the parts on the track all have different targets, some to modules also targeted by parts on unrelated tracks even, then what do you do? It does have the chance to get very messy...

> DiGiT < · Post by **> DiGiT <** » Fri Nov 30, 2012 7:50 pm

good point, i hadnt thought about that, maybe because i usually put one target per track. maybe you would specify if you only want to clone to a new midi channel (for multi timbral plugins etc) or clone with 1 (or maybe more?) layer of depth within mux. hmm its getting messy youre right

dakkra · Post by **dakkra** » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:03 pm

I hadn't thought about the mux getting crowded. That brings a very good point. LMMS wasn't near as advanced as Mulab so it was able to have this feature. But because Mulabs' core is modular it would make sense to leave it be the way it is. As said already there is a way to clone a rack and point a track to it so I guess I already have what I asked for.

However an implentation of a right click clone on the rack would be very nice to those of us who don't know all the shortcuts. Just my two cents though.

mickeh · Post by **mickeh** » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:27 pm

Yes, that's something I have wished for a while too

Menawhile, thanks to liquidsound for the tip to use meanwhile

liquidsound · Post by **liquidsound** » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:57 pm

You're welcome. The idea was nice but MuLab is a different Beast to deal with and as soon we get under the surface (as Pljones pointed out) we see the difference from other DAWs .
I love it!

> DiGiT < · Post by **> DiGiT <** » Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:54 pm

haha youre a dweeb

do you really have me on ignore? have a nice day

dakkra · Post by **dakkra** » Sat Dec 01, 2012 1:01 am

> DiGiT < wrote:haha youre a dweeb do you really have me on ignore? have a nice day

Ok man, please don't start another fight on the forums. We are discussing features that we would like and pro's/con's to them.

Thankyou

Dakkra

P.S

I'm not being mean, I just want the forums to be a place for a good community(not that you're bad, but certain things can be taken as an offense) .

> DiGiT < · Post by **> DiGiT <** » Sat Dec 01, 2012 1:23 am

if the guy is a dweeb then hes a dweeb. another fight? was there a fight here before? i must have missed it. but dont worry the guy cant even hear me lol! no fight but i call em like i see em.

btw didnt you throw in the towel once you realized you could do this with what you have already?

dakkra · Post by **dakkra** » Sat Dec 01, 2012 2:31 am

Kinda, I have to use liquid sounds' trick but I would much prefer a right click option.

> DiGiT < · Post by **> DiGiT <** » Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:44 am

theres no trick to doing it the long way. we were in discussion over the feasibility of simplifying the process so you didnt need the long way. this is usually the form a solution takes in software when theres no easy button--a 'workaround'. btw i have used clone track often in other favorite software and agree that it poses a benefit to the studio environment, as handy as cut copy paste even. it definitely fits into the ergonomics concept that im so fond of.

mickeh · Post by **mickeh** » Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:24 pm

Liquidsound and Digit:

Yes, I love Mulab too, and I'm also a friend of ergonomic workflow - I think these two are connected.

And there always something more to be done (Hence this - and other threads), like the rest of life, right?

> DiGiT < · Post by **> DiGiT <** » Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:40 pm

huh? not sure what you are saying here

liquidsound · Post by **liquidsound** » Sat Dec 01, 2012 5:56 pm

mickeh wrote:Liquidsound and Digit:

Yes, I love Mulab too, and I'm also a friend of ergonomic workflow - I think these two are connected.
And there always something more to be done (Hence this - and other threads), like the rest of life, right?

of course.
If you remember around v2.x I was probably a major pusher, and sometime a pain in the butt, for a workflow similar to something like EnergyXT, primarily in the Pianoroll area. MuLab has surpassed XT and other DAWs with its simplicity and hidden power but, being modular, sometime it's just not that easy to keep implementing "ideas" on a weekly or monthly basis without conflicting with a roadmap which leads to the developer vision supported and co-created by us the users.

As of now I'm quite happy (but it'll never ends right?

) with the workflow and what's coming with M5 is better than I was wishing for.

Ideas are great and being part if the whish list will contribute to Jo and Our MuLab.....

mickeh · Post by **mickeh** » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:53 pm

> DiGiT < wrote:huh? not sure what you are saying here

"ergonomics concept that im so fond of"

Something like: I really think ergonomics is important too, and that I think that Mulab is good in that area, but there always thing left to do to make it even better, just like everything else in life.

Hope I was a bit clearer this time around...?

MuTools

KVR Audio

Yet another Mulab request