About Monark - reviews & stuff
-
- KVRist
- 252 posts since 6 Jun, 2002 from San Francisco, CA
I've only played around with Monark for 10 minutes or so but WOW. Sounds fantastic. Subbed out the bass sound in the song I was working on with a Monark bass and it's just massive. Maybe too massive!
- KVRAF
- 25849 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
Finally somebody said it
Bernard Sumner, New Order wrote:The Monark is my new go-to synth for analog sounds
-
FiascoAndretti FiascoAndretti https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=152699
- KVRist
- 258 posts since 30 May, 2007 from Denver, CO
hate to be a broken record but the bass sounds from this thing are incredibly warm and fat. Pretty impressed actually.
-
- KVRist
- 252 posts since 6 Jun, 2002 from San Francisco, CA
Given their previous track record with Reaktor instrument (eg: Razor) demos - not gonna happen.Stopani wrote:What do you guys think the chances of a Monark Demo actually being made available?
-
- KVRist
- 464 posts since 27 Nov, 2009
If you want poly build a MIDI voice assigner / splitter effect in Reaktor, MAX or Logic's environment and use monark on multiple tracks with the same preset slightly tweaked. If you're doing simple cords you can just transpose the MIDI that goes to the other tracks so you can still use one note to trigger it. Adjust panning or use phase adjustment plugs as needed.
Anyway, it's got a nice, big, stupid interface which is nice. I like to sample it and load it in absynth.
Anyway, it's got a nice, big, stupid interface which is nice. I like to sample it and load it in absynth.
- KVRAF
- 7795 posts since 20 Jul, 2004 from Clearwater
I have to take back what I said about Reaktor now, the updates that NI made to it have obviously changed things. Monark sounds amazing, and I think it will be a perfect compliment to Diva similar to how U-NO-LX is, considering how they both use less CPU and targets a specific sound.
www.anthonywebster.com/audio/monarp.mp3
www.anthonywebster.com/audio/monarp.mp3
Last edited by djanthonyw on Wed Apr 10, 2013 7:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Wavsen.com - Professional mix delivery platform with client approval, watermarking, and portfolio page builder.
- KVRist
- 165 posts since 18 Jan, 2012
try setting Gate midi upper limit to 1 from 127 in its properties, you will lose velocity, but neither monophonic version was having itIngonator wrote:So for i did not find a way to make the Monark poly modifications work properly but i'll try again.
Ingo
- KVRAF
- 24456 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
They did no updates to the Reaktor Core modules since Reaktor 5 hit the streets over 6 years ago. Ergo, no changes in "sound". Just takes knowledge to do things as great as Monark does, utilizing Reaktor Core.djanthonyw wrote:the updates that NI made to it have obviously changed things.
This is what I've been talking for quite some time now.
- KVRAF
- 7795 posts since 20 Jul, 2004 from Clearwater
I thought they made custom modules that are locked in Monark?
Wavsen.com - Professional mix delivery platform with client approval, watermarking, and portfolio page builder.
- KVRAF
- 24456 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
They are all made with Reaktor Core. Nothing custom about it. Just two big Core macros are locked - the filter and the amp+envelopes.
- KVRAF
- 12522 posts since 21 Mar, 2008 from Hannover, Germany
Thanks. Now the Poly modification seems to sound normal.fluxmind wrote:try setting Gate midi upper limit to 1 from 127 in its properties, you will lose velocity, but neither monophonic version was having itIngonator wrote:So for i did not find a way to make the Monark poly modifications work properly but i'll try again.
Ingo
Anyway by diconnecting the two complex modules from "PK" and "GT" you seem to loose features in the Page B settings (e.g. note priority). Anyway for poly sounds the note priority does not seem to be really important.
In those complex modules while those seem to be totally open i did not find anything where i could get the same result than using the "Note Pitch" module.
Maybe i'll work on a Poly version of my free patches, at least for the patches where this makes sense. I'll also try to post the procedure (with mentioning fluxmind of course) to my thread.
The modified procedure seems to be like this now (thanks to fluxmind again):
1. Enable editing mode, Go to "Panel/Monark/Monark", disconnect from "Volt" cell PK, GT
2. Create "Note Pitch" and "Gate" and connect "Note Pitch" to PK and Gate to GT
3. Go into the "Function" tab of the "Gate" module (right-click and "Properties") and set "Upper Limit (MIDI) to 1 (instead of 127).
4. Still at the same place disconnect "Volt" cell from "Out 1", create "Out Port" and "Audio Voice Combiner" and Connect "Audio Voice Combiner" output to Out 1 and Out 2 and then Connect "Volt" cell output to Audio Voice Combiner input
5. Now go to "Panel/Monark" disconnect Out 2 and connect that Out 2 to Second free Out
6. Go back to "Panel/Monark/Moanrk" and disable "Mono" in "Volt" cells properties
7. Go to back to "panel" click on Monark name and in Properties page enable as many voices as you want (or how many your CPU could handle...)
8. Go to file and save ensemble as Monark Poly, because I don't now how to make a switch for mono/poly yet, so you will have 2 versions, one normal monophonic and one Polyphonic
A few features like e.g. page B settings don't seem to be available now.
Here are two screenshots showing the modifications:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/532 ... rk%201.png
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/532 ... rk%202.png
Ingo
Last edited by Ingonator on Thu Apr 11, 2013 6:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ingo Weidner
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
- KVRAF
- 12522 posts since 21 Mar, 2008 from Hannover, Germany
Using two of my Monark patches I just created an audio demo using one instance of the poly modification (see last post) and one instance with a Lead sound:
Monark - Horny Viola Part II (+FXs)
FXs used: ValhallaDSP ValhallaVintageVerb, ERS Dimension D Chorus
patches used: "Viola IW" (slightly modified for polyphonic use), "Horn IW"
Here is an older demo where i use 3 instances of Monark to create "one finger" chords (same patches used):
Monark - Horny Viola Part I (+FXs)
additionally to the FXs of the other demo the Arts Acoustic Big Stone Phase Shifter and the Pitch MIDI effect from Ableton Live were used in this.
UPDATE:
I just added the procedure for a polyphonic Monark (of course with mentioning fluxmind who had the idea) and the new demo at my own Monark thread:
http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic ... 09#5318409
More will hopefully follow and will be published there.
Ingo
Monark - Horny Viola Part II (+FXs)
FXs used: ValhallaDSP ValhallaVintageVerb, ERS Dimension D Chorus
patches used: "Viola IW" (slightly modified for polyphonic use), "Horn IW"
Here is an older demo where i use 3 instances of Monark to create "one finger" chords (same patches used):
Monark - Horny Viola Part I (+FXs)
additionally to the FXs of the other demo the Arts Acoustic Big Stone Phase Shifter and the Pitch MIDI effect from Ableton Live were used in this.
UPDATE:
I just added the procedure for a polyphonic Monark (of course with mentioning fluxmind who had the idea) and the new demo at my own Monark thread:
http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic ... 09#5318409
More will hopefully follow and will be published there.
Ingo
Last edited by Ingonator on Thu Apr 11, 2013 5:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ingo Weidner
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
