One-Synth-Challenge Special: Computer Music - Chat & Gossip
-
- KVRian
- 929 posts since 13 Jan, 2013 from United States
I'm playing around with the various synths to see which one feels like it would be the most fun to use, and Aalto only plays in mono -- is anyone else experiencing this? Thanks.
- KVRian
- 1276 posts since 30 Apr, 2004 from Louisville, KY
Yes...everyone. "Next-level monosynth from Madrona Labs, with patchable modulation, unusual features and astounding analogue-style sound" YWontrackp wrote:Aalto only plays in mono -- is anyone else experiencing this? Thanks.
- KVRist
- 122 posts since 11 May, 2013
Yeah, you'll have to layer that. But Alto is still a great synth...ontrackp wrote:I'm playing around with the various synths to see which one feels like it would be the most fun to use, and Aalto only plays in mono -- is anyone else experiencing this? Thanks.
- KVRer
- 25 posts since 15 Jan, 2010 from Durham, UK
Perfectionism (which I guess is subtly related to fear) has always been my main problem. But the 3 OSCs I have attempted I have completed fairly quickly (this month's took about 10 hours). I'm certainly improving, and stuff like this definitely helps. But the main reason for me participating is for the limitations, to help improve my sound design (and composing I guess). The 'friendly competition' also helps, but I'm not at all in this for the prizes, although they would of course be a nice bonus.bjporter wrote:A few things OSC taught me (of many, including the ones Mulperi said):
1) The opportunity and motive to actually finish songs... perhaps before OSC I had 14+ hours of misc demos, and maybe 1 song (my own song, not something done for or with others). That's a good mindset to have...............
I'm a huge advocate of deliberately limiting oneself to be able to get the most out of minimal tools. My last blog post was on this topic (http://www.music4yourproject.com/1/post ... e-box.html) for those who are interested. (I'm trying to figure out how to stop the blog sidebar from overlapping. Just now discovered it... WYSIWYG editor was showing it to be ok).
Anyway moving on.... I buy CM nearly every month. Have done for nearly a decade. Pretty much taught me the majority of what I know. Funnily, I just started a track consisting of only CM plugins the day before I started the MonoFury OSC. Wasn't limiting enough though, reminding me that I should return to the OSC!
I'd probably use SynthMasterCM, but it's killing Reaper quite quickly for some reason (it's the only synth I've come across that does!) Probably use Aalto instead. It seems very unique!
Edit: SynthMaster is fine today. :/
Edit No. 2: No it's not. Crashed when turning on the distortion. Apparently it crashes every DAW with the x64 plugin, yet the x86 is meant to be ok.
Meanwhile...... https://soundcloud.com/blaakkeye.
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3922 posts since 15 Dec, 2009
shortmanb wrote:Alchemy CM for me.
RULES:
Submissions MUST comply with ALL the rules HERE
+ Use any one CM synth from any issue (except Z3TA+ which was a giveaway, not a CM synth)
+ No sample based synths allowed (single-cycle samples for wavetable synthesis are Ok)
+ CM effects (from any issue) are allowed as long they comply with the OSC rules
+ The name of the synth used must be declared when announcing your entry
+ Entries must be submitted before 1st November (KVR time)
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3922 posts since 15 Dec, 2009
Blaakk wrote:I'd probably use SynthMasterCM, but it's killing Reaper quite quickly for some reason (it's the only synth I've come across that does!) Probably use Aalto instead. It seems very unique!
Edit: SynthMaster is fine today. :/
Edit No. 2: No it's not. Crashed when turning on the distortion. Apparently it crashes every DAW with the x64 plugin, yet the x86 is meant to be ok.

Don't forget you can always run plugins in 'buggy mode' or even as a separate or dedicated process which should sort you out. Just right-click the VST name in the FX menu when loading for the relevant menu.
- KVRAF
- 4287 posts since 6 Nov, 2009
Issue #182 has the oldest plugs availible in the online vault afaik, so if you get that issue and a current issue then you'll have a good selection of plugs.chk071 wrote:Just order it here: http://de.zinio.com/www/ You get the digital copy, then you can register on the Computer Music vault site, where you can download the whole contents of the DVD. It should include all plugins.
- KVRian
- 1451 posts since 4 Oct, 2012 from Utah
SynthmasterCM didn't have a noise oscillator that I could find. Kinda hard to do general percussion without that feature. I went with DuneCM instead. Though, not quite as good as SynthmasterCM 
Software portfolio
M.N.I.E - soon to be my musical portfolio
Hey, I'm Eurydice(Izzy for short) - she/her
M.N.I.E - soon to be my musical portfolio
Hey, I'm Eurydice(Izzy for short) - she/her
- KVRAF
- 2241 posts since 29 Sep, 2011
Yes. No problem with EQ or filter - just no commercial plugins outside of your DAW's native ones, freeware ones are okay, too.shortmanb wrote:Can external filter plugin's be used to filter the tone of the sound? Like my stock DAW eq or filter can be applied to the sound?
- KVRist
- 63 posts since 14 Jun, 2013
Thank to e@rs and bjporter finally I got the plugins.
What I wanted to say is that I adore those developers who spread their plugins just as .dll bundle (32\64 etc) (optional manuals and presets)
And I hate when there is full screen installer, tones of different folders you need to point and checkboxes, bla bla. When I install such plugins I always have feeling that they make my system dirty, a specially on Windows... Why creating Start menu folder? Why placing documentation in Program Files directory? Why placing presets in 'My Documents' folder. I have no idea what they are putting into my system. Do they really think I have 'My Music' or 'My Videos' nearby their YetAnotherAwesomeVSTi preset folder? Man, I tired manually manage all my plugins and presets, moving them to separate folders by type or manufacturer %) e.g. I have different VST folder than default, sep. presets folder, etc.
Great butthurt while installing all dat plugins.

I think regular plugin has to have sep folder, pres folder [manual, install notes], and list of dlls by technology. Just to copy them where I want, and not to play with installers every time I reinstall Windows.
So I like plane developers far more. Cheers guys, real gems!

ps: Does anybody know if Cubase (Windows) need to store 32 and 64 bit [vst2 \ vst3] (I hate dat situation in windows, what a facepalm) plugins in separate folders as it need different processing or whatever?
pps: and yeah, bjporter really knows what's what synth percussion!
What I wanted to say is that I adore those developers who spread their plugins just as .dll bundle (32\64 etc) (optional manuals and presets)
And I hate when there is full screen installer, tones of different folders you need to point and checkboxes, bla bla. When I install such plugins I always have feeling that they make my system dirty, a specially on Windows... Why creating Start menu folder? Why placing documentation in Program Files directory? Why placing presets in 'My Documents' folder. I have no idea what they are putting into my system. Do they really think I have 'My Music' or 'My Videos' nearby their YetAnotherAwesomeVSTi preset folder? Man, I tired manually manage all my plugins and presets, moving them to separate folders by type or manufacturer %) e.g. I have different VST folder than default, sep. presets folder, etc.
Great butthurt while installing all dat plugins.

I think regular plugin has to have sep folder, pres folder [manual, install notes], and list of dlls by technology. Just to copy them where I want, and not to play with installers every time I reinstall Windows.
So I like plane developers far more. Cheers guys, real gems!

ps: Does anybody know if Cubase (Windows) need to store 32 and 64 bit [vst2 \ vst3] (I hate dat situation in windows, what a facepalm) plugins in separate folders as it need different processing or whatever?
pps: and yeah, bjporter really knows what's what synth percussion!
-
- KVRian
- 929 posts since 13 Jan, 2013 from United States
If it is a mono synth by design perhaps they should remove the parameter control for number of voices, rather than have it on the interface but inactive.bftucker wrote:Yes...everyone. "Next-level monosynth from Madrona Labs, with patchable modulation, unusual features and astounding analogue-style sound" YWontrackp wrote:Aalto only plays in mono -- is anyone else experiencing this? Thanks.
Thanks for the clarification.
-
- KVRian
- 929 posts since 13 Jan, 2013 from United States
The modulation oscillators can be set to noise, so you can FM (and maybe PM) a voice oscillator to create a noise effect. I've been using this to make drums but it's challenging......dakkra wrote:SynthmasterCM didn't have a noise oscillator that I could find. Kinda hard to do general percussion without that feature. I went with DuneCM instead. Though, not quite as good as SynthmasterCM
-
- KVRAF
- 7509 posts since 14 Nov, 2006 from Ankara, Turkey
Make sure you dont turn on the Distortion for the filter with the x64 version. OR, use the 32bit version and it wont crash.Blaakk wrote: I'd probably use SynthMasterCM, but it's killing Reaper quite quickly for some reason (it's the only synth I've come across that does!) Probably use Aalto instead. It seems very unique!
Edit: SynthMaster is fine today. :/
Edit No. 2: No it's not. Crashed when turning on the distortion. Apparently it crashes every DAW with the x64 plugin, yet the x86 is meant to be ok.
Works at KV331 Audio
SynthMaster voted #1 in MusicRadar's "Best Synth of 2019" poll
SynthMaster One voted #4 in MusicRadar's "Best Synth of 2019" poll
SynthMaster voted #1 in MusicRadar's "Best Synth of 2019" poll
SynthMaster One voted #4 in MusicRadar's "Best Synth of 2019" poll
