I think I'm supposed to lolz at that, but I'm not quite sure.cryophonik wrote:Of all the DAWs that I own, but never use and can't sell, FL Studio is the clearly the best IMO. Its CPU performance when sitting idle on my hard drive is negligible, and the sound that it doesn't make is nothing short of silence. What more could a person ask for in a DAW that he's stuck with?
FL Studio still the top dog!
-
- KVRAF
- 42529 posts since 21 Dec, 2005
-
- KVRAF
- 2236 posts since 25 Dec, 2005
good thing,fl studio is in the process of a complete vector based gui rewrite,i'm curious how this will be turned out but it needs some months.
- KVRAF
- 8644 posts since 2 Oct, 2006 from Leeds, UK
I've had a license for years and i've gotten more heavily into it in this version.
It's great for working with plugins, good stability and cpu use, the bridging means i can use my old 32 bit plugins, mp3 export etc. But better than the likes of Live and Studio One as a professional daw?
It's got a lot of nice stuff but i wouldn't use it for mixing and mastering, the mixer is too small (for me) and you've really gotta be organised with the windows.
I wish stuff was better integrated into the gui like a fully resizeable mixer but the interface is getting updated at long last, hopefully that will make working in the FL environment more intuitive but i think that's a while off.
Still, don't get all the hate and bashing but i guess haters gonna hate!
It's great for working with plugins, good stability and cpu use, the bridging means i can use my old 32 bit plugins, mp3 export etc. But better than the likes of Live and Studio One as a professional daw?
It's got a lot of nice stuff but i wouldn't use it for mixing and mastering, the mixer is too small (for me) and you've really gotta be organised with the windows.
I wish stuff was better integrated into the gui like a fully resizeable mixer but the interface is getting updated at long last, hopefully that will make working in the FL environment more intuitive but i think that's a while off.
Still, don't get all the hate and bashing but i guess haters gonna hate!
Latest release and Socials: https://linktr.ee/ph.i.ltr3
- KVRAF
- 2750 posts since 2 Feb, 2005 from Raincoast of Grayland
Anyone who uses a DAW that can't double as a breakfast cereal has given up on self-deprecating humour and cats.Arglebargle wrote:Anyone who uses a DAW that can double as a breakfast cereal has given up on life.CTStump wrote:Just to stir the pot a little more...
I couldn't use a piece of software that so embarrassed of it's name that they resort to just the initials.
Silly argument and irreverent to most, such as polls it's subjective.In this day and age with regular updating you need a live and dynamic poll to be more accurate.
Software is not static, with each update and upgrade things change overnight so a yearly poll is rather useless(especially if your favored "DAW" loses).

perception: the stuff reality is made of.
- KVRAF
- 7872 posts since 21 Dec, 2002 from MD USA
FL Studio is by far the best host for me. I have tried them all too.
my music: http://www.alexcooperusa.com
"It's hard to be humble, when you're as great as I am." Muhammad Ali
"It's hard to be humble, when you're as great as I am." Muhammad Ali
-
- KVRAF
- 42529 posts since 21 Dec, 2005
lolz, first off I think most of this is in jest. Second, they are not exactly the best/communication/friendliest of the daw companiesmusikmachine wrote:
Still, don't get all the hate and bashing but i guess haters gonna hate!
-
- Banned
- 3946 posts since 25 Jan, 2009
Jokes aside, I have no reason to bash FL Studio. It is daw and (almost) all daws are amazing. However, any demoed daw that does not make sense intuitively within the first 15 minutes of playing with it is a no go for me. A good daw is one that does not need big manuals. But maybe I am just a lazy lad or stupid like shit or both.
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
+1IncarnateX wrote:Jokes aside, I have no reason to bash FL Studio. It is daw and (almost) all daws are amazing. However, any demoed daw that does not make sense intuitively within the first 15 minutes of playing with it is a no go for me. A good daw is one that does not need big manuals. But maybe I am just a lazy lad or stupid like shit or both.
That's why i never really clicked with Reaper. :/ What i really liked is how Ableton and Podium include the help/manual inside the program. Although, as you said, with an intuitive program, that should hardly be necessary, but sometimes, of course, there is a function which can't be self explanatory.
- KVRAF
- 8644 posts since 2 Oct, 2006 from Leeds, UK
Fantastic!mandolarian wrote:Anyone who uses a DAW that can't double as a breakfast cereal has given up on self-deprecating humour and cats.Arglebargle wrote:Anyone who uses a DAW that can double as a breakfast cereal has given up on life.CTStump wrote:Just to stir the pot a little more...
I couldn't use a piece of software that so embarrassed of it's name that they resort to just the initials.
Silly argument and irreverent to most, such as polls it's subjective.In this day and age with regular updating you need a live and dynamic poll to be more accurate.
Software is not static, with each update and upgrade things change overnight so a yearly poll is rather useless(especially if your favored "DAW" loses).![]()
Latest release and Socials: https://linktr.ee/ph.i.ltr3
-
- KVRist
- 349 posts since 5 Nov, 2012
Using the a proper super-advanced-algo such as this one:Numanoid wrote:As voted by users of Music Radar:
http://www.musicradar.com/tuition/tech/ ... -238905/16For the second year running, MusicRadar users have voted FL Studio their favourite DAW.
The software began life as Fruity Loops, the phenomenally popular step-based beat/groove maker that's been used by aspiring producers the world over (Deadmau5 included). However, full-on DAW status was achieved some time ago - if you think that this is merely an entry-level application that only allows you to create loops, you need to take a second look.
FL Studio might not be for everyone, but if its workflow agrees with you, you'll never look back. There's even an iOS version now, and version 11 has kept the desktop version moving forward by adding a Performance mode, multitouch support, new synths and new effects. What's more, you get the feeling that there are even greater things to come.
var ranking = (daw_votes / warez_count)
Fruity Loops is at #1203
Congrats! You are the most popular daw to download off of TPB!
- KVRAF
- 8644 posts since 2 Oct, 2006 from Leeds, UK
I think i read a few versions or at least it won't be 12.t3toooo wrote:good thing,fl studio is in the process of a complete vector based gui rewrite,i'm curious how this will be turned out but it needs some months.
Latest release and Socials: https://linktr.ee/ph.i.ltr3
- KVRAF
- 8644 posts since 2 Oct, 2006 from Leeds, UK
It's hard to tell when it comes to FL!hibidy wrote:lolz, first off I think most of this is in jest. Second, they are not exactly the best/communication/friendliest of the daw companiesmusikmachine wrote:
Still, don't get all the hate and bashing but i guess haters gonna hate!(think tony tony chopper or gol or whoever he is) so some people have some pent up shit. But I wouldn't know about that.
Edit: For those reasons but i thought people took major umbrage with FL winning.
Latest release and Socials: https://linktr.ee/ph.i.ltr3
-
- KVRAF
- 6159 posts since 4 Dec, 2004
Lol. 
Maybe some are just annoyed because it won twice without massive net campaigns.
Whenever someone suggests i go vote for my fave in one of these straw polls I usually go vote the underdog, Garageband. 
Go Fruity!
Maybe some are just annoyed because it won twice without massive net campaigns.
Go Fruity!