What is the difference between music and noise? [years-dead slappyfight revived]
- KVRAF
- 5703 posts since 8 Dec, 2004 from The Twin Cities
"What is the difference between music and noise?"
Meaning.
Music has or is capable of symbolic meaning, whereas noise can at best be a sign.
This is an extremely problematic definition, filled with all kinds of caveats and redefinitions and exceptions. And I'm sticking with it.
Meaning.
Music has or is capable of symbolic meaning, whereas noise can at best be a sign.
This is an extremely problematic definition, filled with all kinds of caveats and redefinitions and exceptions. And I'm sticking with it.
-
- KVRAF
- 42529 posts since 21 Dec, 2005
I don't know what "genre" it is but seems to me I've heard all kinds of stuff both here on kvr and other forums with people that have made cool music out of "noise"
Not sure if that's on topic
Not sure if that's on topic
- KVRAF
- 1724 posts since 31 Dec, 2004 from betwixt
Slappyfight!
Music / noise no difference it's all in our heads. Now I'm a quantum physicist too. War out!
Music / noise no difference it's all in our heads. Now I'm a quantum physicist too. War out!
- KVRAF
- 12615 posts since 7 Dec, 2004
Did you read the post where I defined this according to well a established mathematical truth? Not problematic at all.herodotus wrote:"What is the difference between music and noise?"
Meaning.
Music has or is capable of symbolic meaning, whereas noise can at best be a sign.
This is an extremely problematic definition, filled with all kinds of caveats and redefinitions and exceptions. And I'm sticking with it.
Except that most people will never understand this...
However, the fact people may be incapable of understanding an abstract mathematical truth does not affect its truth.
Free plug-ins for Windows, MacOS and Linux. Xhip Synthesizer v8.0 and Xhip Effects Bundle v6.7.
The coder's credo: We believe our work is neither clever nor difficult; it is done because we thought it would be easy.
Work less; get more done.
The coder's credo: We believe our work is neither clever nor difficult; it is done because we thought it would be easy.
Work less; get more done.
- KVRAF
- 5703 posts since 8 Dec, 2004 from The Twin Cities
Sadly I missed this revelation. As we are at 40 pages and climbing at this point, could you quote it?aciddose wrote:
Did you read the post where I defined this according to well a established mathematical truth? Not problematic at all.![]()
- addled muppet weed
- 111286 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
noise is beautiful, like an embryo of sound, endless possibilities. full of the universe, every moment offering something amazing. vibrations of molecules interacting with one another providing a soundtrack to everything in time and existence.
music is well a little bit meh!
music is well a little bit meh!
- KVRAF
- 5703 posts since 8 Dec, 2004 from The Twin Cities
Poetic.vurt wrote:noise is beautiful, like an embryo of sound, endless possibilities. full of the universe, every moment offering something amazing. vibrations of molecules interacting with one another providing a soundtrack to everything in time and existence.
Well that's cynical.music is well a little bit meh!
Music is just people interacting with sound.
Don't you like people?
- KVRAF
- 5223 posts since 20 Jul, 2010
All this talk of beautiful noise makes me want to watch Eraserhead.
http://sendy.bandcamp.com/releases < My new album at Bandcamp! Now pay what you like!
- addled muppet weed
- 111286 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
theyre ok from a distanceherodotus wrote:
Don't you like people?
-
- KVRAF
- 16738 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
Other people are totally overrated.vurt wrote:theyre ok from a distanceherodotus wrote:
Don't you like people?
- KVRAF
- 5703 posts since 8 Dec, 2004 from The Twin Cities
ghettosynth wrote:Other people are totally overrated.vurt wrote:theyre ok from a distanceherodotus wrote:
Don't you like people?

- KVRAF
- 12615 posts since 7 Dec, 2004
It's only a few pages back.herodotus wrote:Sadly I missed this revelation. As we are at 40 pages and climbing at this point, could you quote it?aciddose wrote:
Did you read the post where I defined this according to well a established mathematical truth? Not problematic at all.![]()
In any case it's a definition of music as data you can decode and noise as data you can not decode.
It can also be put as "data you're looking for, data you're not looking for".
"Music to my ears, not music to my ears."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy_%2 ... _theory%29
I also demonstrated that you can take the very same data representing "music" in the form of PCM and apply a compression to this such as that used by 7zip. The result is transformed into what is indistinguishable from white noise given that the "listener" lacks the tools required for statistical analysis of the high-entropy signal. The data contained within however remains identical and definitely "music".
Conversation then turned to whether or not birdsong is music. We've been able to find that it is indeed music. Again, for many of us "data we weren't looking for". Not only data but in fact there seems to be enough understanding of birdsong (wide-spread and well established for 100s of years) to definitively define some of it as music equal to human composition. To question this is possible of course (was the music intended to convey emotion? which emotion? are birds capable of this?) but to call into question whether we define birdsong as music also would bring into question whether we define human compositions as music.
Of course this doesn't give us any information about the meaning of symbols encoded in the signal or what they may represent. That is in the subjective/interpretive domain. We can however make statements about whether symbols are present or not and how many of them are present (entropy / data density) definitively.
My suspicion is that for the most part the entropy of human music is very, very low. PCM is an extremely inefficient encoding. This opens up lots of discussion regarding complex timbre,, higher order modulations and so on. Given that we take only the most basic representation of a melody however the ratio is extremely large between notation vs. PCM.
Free plug-ins for Windows, MacOS and Linux. Xhip Synthesizer v8.0 and Xhip Effects Bundle v6.7.
The coder's credo: We believe our work is neither clever nor difficult; it is done because we thought it would be easy.
Work less; get more done.
The coder's credo: We believe our work is neither clever nor difficult; it is done because we thought it would be easy.
Work less; get more done.
-
PurpleCatfishBettie PurpleCatfishBettie https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=211816
- KVRAF
- 3278 posts since 22 Jul, 2009
-
The_Hidden_Goose The_Hidden_Goose https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=10878
- KVRian
- 945 posts since 8 Dec, 2003 from Birmingham-ish, UK (Tamworth, but shhh!)
I like both in the right context.
Noise can be music to me in the sense that my mind can make stories/images/context out of white noise at the right time - even though it can't be "decoded" as such, it can have an effect that works much the same.
In the same way that one can sometimes make static or sometimes moving images out of white noise, simply because of how the information gets from the world into your brain and the potential for unexepected interpreatations and mutations fo that information on the way.
I tend to find it happens more easily when in a hypnagogic state, when the brain is partway through winding down but still taking in external information.
Noise can be music to me in the sense that my mind can make stories/images/context out of white noise at the right time - even though it can't be "decoded" as such, it can have an effect that works much the same.
In the same way that one can sometimes make static or sometimes moving images out of white noise, simply because of how the information gets from the world into your brain and the potential for unexepected interpreatations and mutations fo that information on the way.
I tend to find it happens more easily when in a hypnagogic state, when the brain is partway through winding down but still taking in external information.
Q. Why is a mouse when it spins?
A. The higher the fewer.
A. The higher the fewer.