Moog System 55 vs Uhe Ace.

Official support for: u-he.com
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

I want the same thing, i want an ACE into Bazille.
Reality is a Condition due to Lack of Weed!

Post

In that video i really liked a parametric filter. I do not think Uhe has it in any of their products. I know in Dcam Synth Squade it is build in to Amber which is string machine but unfortionaly i cannot use it for other DCam Synths. But they promised to change that in new version of Dcam Synth Squade they currently developing.
Last edited by chilly7 on Wed Feb 25, 2015 12:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
https://слово-божье.рф
Image

Post

BasariStudios wrote:I want the same thing, i want an ACE into Bazille.
And i want Bazzilie with Ace to Zebra 3. :clap:
My base model of Mac Pro should hold it in draft mode but then i can render in at max quality for a final song.
https://слово-божье.рф
Image

Post

rod_zero wrote: Moog modular V is a full modular, ACE has a fixed architechture than is overcomed as you use it's modular conections.
Ace has some pre-wired connections but it is fully modular.

Post


Post

And something more 'modular sounding'

http://draigathar.org/sounds/G2.mp3

Post

Back when Wendy Carlos said that compared to the Modular the Minimoog was a "toy". If anyone has the right to be a little snooty, she's earned it. A lot of other synthesists have made a lot of great sounds on a lot of different instruments, but none have surpassed.
ACE is a terrific piece of software with a real good sound. Arturia's Modular V has lots of emulated modules that are fun to hook up. But it don't sound like a real Moog Modular.

Post

pdxindy wrote:And something more 'modular sounding'

http://draigathar.org/sounds/G2.mp3
What is it?
https://слово-божье.рф
Image

Post

chilly7 wrote:
pdxindy wrote:And something more 'modular sounding'

http://draigathar.org/sounds/G2.mp3
What is it?
Sounds like Aalto

Post

chilly7 wrote:
BasariStudios wrote:Chilly, what language are those letters on your video? Besides Cirilica, is it Armenian?
And from what i've heard you need like 3 Systems 55.
It is authentic Cyrillic's. Also another name of Cyrillic's is Glagolic.
To a huge disaster what many people wrongly call Cyrillic's is not Cyrillic's.

I am planing to redo my web site with authentic Cyrillic's but i need to wait until Adobe update their Creative Cloud to a new version so i will have a free 1 month of demo version with no limitation like i did previously my web site. :D Because i cannot afford Creative Cloud to buy right now.

Here is what i found on Wikipedia:
<span class="skimlinks-unlinked">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glagolitic_alphabet</span>
Sorry to hijack the discussion, the signs are indeed the ancient-slavic way of cyrillic writing, but cyrillic and glagolitic are two different alphabets. Glagolitic is developed by Cyrilus and Metodius in Great Moravia, while cyrillic is a heavy simplification of glagolitic with borrowings from the Greek alphabet, originated in early bulgaria.

Oh, and I am also a proud owner of ACE :p

Post

vstliefhebber wrote:Sorry to hijack the discussion, the signs are indeed the ancient-slavic way of cyrillic writing, but cyrillic and glagolitic are two different alphabets. Glagolitic is developed by Cyrilus and Metodius in Great Moravia, while cyrillic is a heavy simplification of glagolitic with borrowings from the Greek alphabet, originated in early bulgaria.
You sir, are 100% correct!


The symbols in chilly's video are indeed glagolitza, but it is not the same thing as cyrillic writing at all.

Post

Totolitoto wrote:
chilly7 wrote:
pdxindy wrote:And something more 'modular sounding'

http://draigathar.org/sounds/G2.mp3
What is it?
Sounds like Aalto
It's ACE

Post

EvilDragon wrote:
vstliefhebber wrote:Sorry to hijack the discussion, the signs are indeed the ancient-slavic way of cyrillic writing, but cyrillic and glagolitic are two different alphabets. Glagolitic is developed by Cyrilus and Metodius in Great Moravia, while cyrillic is a heavy simplification of glagolitic with borrowings from the Greek alphabet, originated in early bulgaria.
You sir, are 100% correct!


The symbols in chilly's video are indeed glagolitza, but it is not the same thing as cyrillic writing at all.
To be fair it is not for sure know that Glagilitsa is true Cyrillic's, because saint Cyril own writing did not saved until now days. Or atlist not yet found. Because after Cyril death his knowledge and dispels where hunted by Catholics church and destroyed and killed because they wanted that Latin language and writing system was a main stream language awry where. And they did not want Slavic language to be used anywhere.

But according to Sava Book https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sava%27s_book it describes a history of writing system in Russia . And it say that saint Cyril created writing system which was no like other systems existed in the world. So according to that statment it cannot be Cyrillic's what people mainstreamly today call Cyrillic's because mostly it is undentical to Greek writing system except fwe additional letters which do not exist in Greek language. Here is example of Ancient Greek writing system http://www.nlr.ru/exib/Gospel/show_img.php?n=viz/img/2.
and here is example what mainstreamly people call Cyrillic's
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.p ... pdf&page=4

Both examples are very similar.

But Glagolitsa is indeed very unique and nothing like other systems existed.

So based on that it looks like Glagolitsya is indeed a true Cyrillic's.
Also there are other facts which shows that Glagolitsa must be a true Cyrillic's.

P.s. Also i am sure Cyrill did not call a writing system in his own name nur Methodius would.
I think they called their system "Glagolitsya" (гʌагοʌнцѣ.) and his Alphabet "Athboyka" (аꙁъбоуκа.) in the name of first two glagols (letters): "az" (аꙁъ) has the meaning "source of awry thing" and "boyka" (боуκа) means "knowladge". And also very interesting in Azboyka is that if u find at full depth only two first glagols (letters) u can discover the rest of glagols( letters) so that's why it was called in the name of first two glagols (letters) but not in the name of first and last glagols (letters). Like ancient philosophers was saying " Discover ur self and u will discover the entire world" and in Slavic language it will be (Оувѣждьаꙁъноувѣснвьсьʍіρъ.) .
Last edited by chilly7 on Fri Feb 27, 2015 9:20 am, edited 3 times in total.
https://слово-божье.рф
Image

Post

pdxindy wrote:
BasariStudios wrote:I just discovered ACE today, HOLY FLOCK! I mean i knew of ACE but never paid attention to it
since i have the other u-He synths. I downloaded the DEMO today and as soon as i played the
Basic SAW OSC i was like WTF? Why was i missing this until now? It has RAW power in it.
ACE is excellent!

I would love love love to have an ACE-XL... That had numerous extra modules, similar to Bazille.

So some lag generators, quantizer, extra envs, multiples etc,
more midi outputs like alt, random, stack etc.
an all on one page GUI
more trigger options such as the env looping from Bazille
and it was not pre-wired.
+1 but I like the pre-wired design. Also, improve the VCA attack...make it "punchier." :hihi:
ALL YOUR DATA ARE BELONG TO US - Google

https://soundcloud.com/dan-ling
http://danling.com

Post

chilly7 wrote:To be fair it is not for sure know that Glagilitsa is true Cyrillic's, because saint Cyril own writing did not saved until now days. Or atlist not yet found. Because after Cyril death his knowledge and dispels where hunted by Catholics church and destroyed and killed because they wanted that Latin language and writing system was a main stream language awry where. And they did not want Slavic language to be used anywhere.
Yet over here in Croatia it was used for our own language, which is Slavic in nature just as yours. :)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ba%C5%A1ka_tablet
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plomin_tablet
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valun_tablet


Then after that we went for Latin writing, but we kept our language - and it started growing from there onwards to how it is today.

Post Reply

Return to “u-he”