Diva Vs. Real Analog

VST, AU, AAX, CLAP, etc. Plugin Virtual Instruments Discussion
Locked New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS
Diva$209.00Buy

Post

do_androids_dream wrote:
chk071 wrote:That's totally contrary to what wagtunes said. He said that his Minimoog sounded like crap when played dry.
His view certainly isn't the common opinion. Maybe he just has a dud of a Minimoog.
It's more the era I grew up in than the synths themselves, which is maybe why I might not be the most objective person when it comes to synths in general, hardware or software.

When I got into synthesis, what I was really looking for at the time was a synth that could do strings. I always loved pop tunes with nice strings. I could never tell which ones were real and which ones were synths because of how processed they all were.

It was by accident that I stumbled onto mono and duophonic synths. There was no polyphonic that I was aware of back in the 70s. At least nothing that was affordable for a poor church mouse like me. I was still living at home making minimum wage ($3 an hour) at my Uncle's store.

So I bought what I could afford just to have something. As I started making more money, still living at home with no expenses, I bought more synths. Moogs, ARPs, Yamahas, you name it. Truth is, I never really loved any of them. To this day I don't get the fascination with old vintage synths. But again, I grew up with this stuff.

To compound matters, I was sick and tired of all the Moog "Lucky Man" solos. It's all you heard. Prog rock was getting stale and eventually died out. It was inevitable. Even ELP came out with a dog of an album that I still can't believe was done by them.

I was simply sick of the whole scene. The only two old synths that, for whatever reason, I still loved the sounds of were the ARP 2600 and the Oberheim. Any Oberheim. I owned the Matrix 6R and the Matrix 1000. I regret selling them both even today with all my soft synths. But the rest of it. Don't miss it.

It wasn't until the days of Korg and the M1 and Wavestation that I really "enjoyed" the sounds that came out of a synth. They sounded, to a degree, like real instruments. The DX7 was on the way out (thank God as I always hated that thing even though I bought one) and synths were growing up. You could actually play something that sounded relatively close to a real orchestra, which was the reason I got into synths in the first place.

Today, with libraries like Vienna, EWQL, 8Dio and others, the sound a real orchestra isn't a dream anymore. It's scary how good some of this stuff sounds.

Truth is, I hated the era I grew up in as far as keyboard instruments went. The sound, the weight of the damn things (Rhodes, Yamaha) and the repairs were just too much. And ironically, I never could stop buying this stuff because I was always looking for that elusive gem. And yes, I was taken in by great demos and guys who could play the crap out of their instrument. But as a mediocre pianist, I could never get anything good out of my instrument. So I'll take the blame for that.

Today, with DAWs and the ability to literally paint your songs, I can actually sound decent. Certainly a hell of a lot better than I ever sounded in the 70s and 80s.

So there is a lot of bitterness and resentment there in regard to these relics because they didn't make me sound like ELP, Genesis, Yes, Kansas, Renaissance, ELO, Triumvirat, Starcastle and all my other favorite prog rock bands. Because yes, in their hands, some of this stuff sounded cool. But even Keith Emerson said he was embarrassed by the "Lucky Man" solo. Personally, I think it was the poisonous snake that eventually killed prog rock. Everybody wanted to sound like that and eventually it was all over the radio.

Point is, I think I hate the era and my own ineptness as a performer that I hated more than the synths themselves.

There are a few hardware synths that, money allowed, I'd love to own. But trust me, a Moog is not one of them.

I've heard enough of that sound to last me a lifetime.

Post

Well the minimoog is quite a limited instrument. I can't stand one myself so I have no problem hearing similar opinions.

The filter is okay, certainly unique although Moog's BS about it being the best possible filter ever I find really annoying. His quotes about how nobody could ever design something as good sounded extremely pompous. Sort of on the Donald Trump level, so you have to give him credit for his marketing ability. It's all about selling yourself and your product really.

When it comes right down to it though the instruments all have numerous issues and as I said, I'd never aim to own one myself even for a reasonable price like $300-$500.
Free plug-ins for Windows, MacOS and Linux. Xhip Synthesizer v8.0 and Xhip Effects Bundle v6.7.
The coder's credo: We believe our work is neither clever nor difficult; it is done because we thought it would be easy.
Work less; get more done.

Post

wagtunes wrote:
do_androids_dream wrote:
chk071 wrote:That's totally contrary to what wagtunes said. He said that his Minimoog sounded like crap when played dry.
His view certainly isn't the common opinion. Maybe he just has a dud of a Minimoog.
It's more the era I grew up in than the synths themselves, which is maybe why I might not be the most objective person when it comes to synths in general, hardware or software.

When I got into synthesis, what I was really looking for at the time was a synth that could do strings. I always loved pop tunes with nice strings. I could never tell which ones were real and which ones were synths because of how processed they all were.

It was by accident that I stumbled onto mono and duophonic synths. There was no polyphonic that I was aware of back in the 70s. At least nothing that was affordable for a poor church mouse like me. I was still living at home making minimum wage ($3 an hour) at my Uncle's store.

So I bought what I could afford just to have something. As I started making more money, still living at home with no expenses, I bought more synths. Moogs, ARPs, Yamahas, you name it. Truth is, I never really loved any of them. To this day I don't get the fascination with old vintage synths. But again, I grew up with this stuff.

To compound matters, I was sick and tired of all the Moog "Lucky Man" solos. It's all you heard. Prog rock was getting stale and eventually died out. It was inevitable. Even ELP came out with a dog of an album that I still can't believe was done by them.

I was simply sick of the whole scene. The only two old synths that, for whatever reason, I still loved the sounds of were the ARP 2600 and the Oberheim. Any Oberheim. I owned the Matrix 6R and the Matrix 1000. I regret selling them both even today with all my soft synths. But the rest of it. Don't miss it.

It wasn't until the days of Korg and the M1 and Wavestation that I really "enjoyed" the sounds that came out of a synth. They sounded, to a degree, like real instruments. The DX7 was on the way out (thank God as I always hated that thing even though I bought one) and synths were growing up. You could actually play something that sounded relatively close to a real orchestra, which was the reason I got into synths in the first place.

Today, with libraries like Vienna, EWQL, 8Dio and others, the sound a real orchestra isn't a dream anymore. It's scary how good some of this stuff sounds.

Truth is, I hated the era I grew up in as far as keyboard instruments went. The sound, the weight of the damn things (Rhodes, Yamaha) and the repairs were just too much. And ironically, I never could stop buying this stuff because I was always looking for that elusive gem. And yes, I was taken in by great demos and guys who could play the crap out of their instrument. But as a mediocre pianist, I could never get anything good out of my instrument. So I'll take the blame for that.

Today, with DAWs and the ability to literally paint your songs, I can actually sound decent. Certainly a hell of a lot better than I ever sounded in the 70s and 80s.

So there is a lot of bitterness and resentment there in regard to these relics because they didn't make me sound like ELP, Genesis, Yes, Kansas, Renaissance, ELO, Triumvirat, Starcastle and all my other favorite prog rock bands. Because yes, in their hands, some of this stuff sounded cool. But even Keith Emerson said he was embarrassed by the "Lucky Man" solo. Personally, I think it was the poisonous snake that eventually killed prog rock. Everybody wanted to sound like that and eventually it was all over the radio.

Point is, I think I hate the era and my own ineptness as a performer that I hated more than the synths themselves.

There are a few hardware synths that, money allowed, I'd love to own. But trust me, a Moog is not one of them.

I've heard enough of that sound to last me a lifetime.
Nice post :tu: Always interesting to read stuff like this. Yes, I can well imagine you being disappointed if you were expecting those early synths to sound close to what they were supposed to be mimicking (strings). Like you say it wasn't until synths like the M1 came along that sounds became more complex and closer to actually sounding like their patch names.

The ARP2600 is one of my favourite synths too - a perfect middle ground between fat and thin sounding but still with a wonderful presence and an awesome filter. If I had to choose one synth to make all my music on forever more it may well be that (unless I was offered a buchla!). I've never particularly been a fan of the minimoog either although I do love, say, Tomita's work with Moog modulars - I'm guessing they share lots of similarities.
Mastering from £30 per track \\\
Facebook \\\ #masteredbyloz

Post

wagtunes wrote: The DX7 was on the way out (thank God as I always hated that thing even though I bought one) and synths were growing up.
You keep mentioning you hated this or that synth, but if you didn't like it when you heard it (tried them out in a music store I guess?) why bother buying any them? If I don't like something, I am certainly not going to buy it.

The DX7 and Minimoog were two of the most popular synths ever. You bought both of those, but you hate them at the same time. :?

Post

Examigan wrote:
wagtunes wrote: The DX7 was on the way out (thank God as I always hated that thing even though I bought one) and synths were growing up.
You keep mentioning you hated this or that synth, but if you didn't like it when you heard it (tried them out in a music store I guess?) why bother buying any them? If I don't like something, I am certainly not going to buy it.

The DX7 and Minimoog were two of the most popular synths ever. You bought both of those, but you hate them at the same time. :?
As I said, I was taken in by the guy in the store who was a concert pianist. He made that DX7 grand piano sound great. And compared to "grand piano" sounds up to that point in time, it was great. But as the years went on, I began to hear how horrible this instrument sounded as far as "real" sounds.

Again, I was looking for "realistic" instruments. I was not looking to make "outer space sci fi" sounds.

I was also pretty damn young too. Today, I would have never bought 99% of the stuff I bought then. But when you're a kid, things are different.

Yes, I'm older and smarter now. It doesn't change how I feel about old hardware.

It really wasn't that great.

Post

zerocrossing wrote:
david.beholder wrote:
Membrane keys, really?
Of course, if they really bother you, you can own an SE-1X for $850. It has the Moog and SEM style filters installed, but it's a three oscillator synth.

http://vintageking.com/studio-electronics-se-1x-vintage
This is a nice find. If I was a pro, that would be a very attractive buy, even if I ordered it from the US!

Anyway, back to reality for me. I'm thinking now more of Waldorf Pulse 2 as my analog solution. It can also fit nicely above the Blofeld keyboard I suppose :D
Using: Cubase Pro 15, Reason 13, Tascam US-4x4HR, MODX6, DM12D, LaunchKey 49, Yamaha guitar(Pacifica 612v) and bass (BB234) and some virtual instruments and synths.

Post

Don't you like the DX7 basses at least, or the, admittedly loose, Rhodes emulation? I still like them today :)

In terms of strings, I suppose most good modern soft synths can do them more authentically then old analog synths or string machines. Especially string pads can sound pretty convincing when done right, not least thanks to the possibility of stacking multiple waves across several oscillators, which was not possible with most hardware. The biggest challenge for me is getting the portamento right.

When emulating real instruments the biggest problem is often not so much the quality of the patch itself, but the way one plays it. It is hard for a keyboarder to play a violin or an electric bass emulation the right way.

Post

wagtunes wrote: It's more the era I grew up in than the synths themselves, which is maybe why I might not be the most objective person when it comes to synths in general, hardware or software.
Maybe it has more to do with the music you chose to listen to. Kraftwerk, Tangerine Dream, OMD, Human League, Throbbing Gristle, Cabaret Voltaire... there was an alternative to prog rock in the 70's...
Incomplete list of my gear: 1/8" audio input jack.

Post

zerocrossing wrote: Really. They seem to work great. I had an ATC-1 for years, and bought it used. It never failed. The X seems to also be high quality. I don't think these are the same technology that was used in the Moog Source from the 80s. Hell, there's a microwave oven built in that's got membrane buttons in the house we're renting and that thing looks like it's from the early 90s and it works fine. I have full confidence in my ATC-X and I do not hesitate to recommend it. They cut corners in the interface so they could make a synth with four filters at a reasonable price. I got mine used for $800. My only complaint is that when I first got it the stupid font on the controls was often unreadable in low light, but I know it so well now I just use it without really looking. I kind of really like the button/tweak editing of the thing.
Don't you find this humiliating a bit? 3 times cheaper BS2 has more controls. Sorry, I'm not paying for others coke'n hookers and buying hardware only for hands on features.

Other than that, let's talk about gear on GS. KVR is about VSTs :)

Post

deastman wrote:
wagtunes wrote: It's more the era I grew up in than the synths themselves, which is maybe why I might not be the most objective person when it comes to synths in general, hardware or software.
Maybe it has more to do with the music you chose to listen to. Kraftwerk, Tangerine Dream, OMD, Human League, Throbbing Gristle, Cabaret Voltaire... there was an alternative to prog rock in the 70's...
Prog rock wasn't the only thing I listened to. I listened to Kraftwerk and Tangerine Dream but there was only so much of them I could take too. Human League was early 80s long after prog rock was pretty much dead. Gristle and Voltaire I never heard of so they must have been pretty underground or just not popular in my neck of the woods.

The era that killed these sounds for me was 1973 - 1978. It was 6 years of Lucky Man solos and related sounds. Or it was aimless wanderings like Kraftwerk and Dream. Yeah, I liked them but after a while it was just more of the same old same old.

I was more into groups like UFO, Queen, Klaatu, Boston, etc. Groups that relied more on non synth instruments. And granted, these guys were also around during the prog rock era.

I enjoyed the early days of Genesis (Foxtrot) and ELP (Trilogy). But by the time Kansas had come out with their last album of the 70s, I was done. The music was stale. For that matter, rock had gotten stale as well. Today, if you look at the pop charts, it's mostly dance oriented Taylor Swift/Max Martin stuff. The days of Stones, Zep, Who and even Aerosmith are over. There are very few big rock bands today, if any. At least not Billboard mainstream.

But for that matter, the whole industry has changed drastically anyway. I seriously doubt The Beatles would make the splash they did in 1964 today. It's a different world.

I still love listening to "Watcher Of The Skies" or "The Sheriff" but those songs gave way to a prog rock that was nothing more than one critic (forget his name) called "musical masturbation" and I agree. It was tedious and done and done and done before.

Listen to ELPs "Love Beach."

Disgraceful. And these guys can play.

Listen to Kansas' last album. Even more disgraceful. And I had every album they made until then.

Even Renaissance, with the golden voice of Annie Haslam, put out some really mundane stuff towards the end.

Maybe there was just nothing left to do.

Whatever the reason, if I never saw or heard another Moog or analog synth in general again, it wouldn't be too soon.

In 1990, things got so bad for me music wise that I stopped buying records completely. There was nothing out there that was worth listening to, IMO.

Today, believe it or not, I actually like a lot of what's out there. I don't particularly care for the rap based songs (always disliked rap music) but the Taylor Swift and Katy Perry stuff is pretty good. Max Martin is a genius. "Love Me Like You Do" is one of the greatest songs I've heard in years.

Sure there are exceptions. Every once in a while a group came along in the last 25 years that I liked. But whereas I would like no less than 100 groups or artists in a year, if I liked 3 a year after 1990, that was a lot.

The big change for me was when hip hop and rap became a major part of the popular music scene. I just can't get into that music. And now it's most of what's on the charts.

Yeah, I know, there's satellite radio, the Internet and tons of places to go to in order to hear music you do like. But I miss the days when I could turn on the radio in the car and almost never hear a song I didn't like.

Whatever. It's all water under the bridge. Bottom line is the 70s killed analog synths for me with very few exceptions. Like I said, I still love the ARP 2600 and the Oberheim stuff, which I'm sorry I sold.

But if I never hear another Moog again I honestly wouldn't care.

Blame Keith Emerson.

Post

Diva IS the new Analog. Realer than the old analog.

Post

wagtunes wrote: As I said, I was taken in by the guy in the store who was a concert pianist. He made that DX7 grand piano sound great. And compared to "grand piano" sounds up to that point in time, it was great. But as the years went on, I began to hear how horrible this instrument sounded as far as "real" sounds.

Again, I was looking for "realistic" instruments. I was not looking to make "outer space sci fi" sounds.

I was also pretty damn young too. Today, I would have never bought 99% of the stuff I bought then. But when you're a kid, things are different.

Yes, I'm older and smarter now. It doesn't change how I feel about old hardware.

It really wasn't that great.
I grew up that era, and was never impressed with the DX7 'Piano' sounds. It was never close. I can't imagine anyone playing the DX7 (no matter how well they played) - making it sound like an acoustic. Maybe you're saying something different?? During that same period where I was picking up my DX7 (after wearing out my welcome in the local Music store for around a year... just playing their floor model), the Yamaha CP-70 was out. It felt / sounded closer to an acoustic than anything electric I had heard back then. If I had the money.. I would have added the CP-70 or CP-80 to my arsenal.. just for the piano sounds. Alas - in my case, I spent everything I had on my DX7, and a used Korg MS-20 . Gave me most of the keyboard sounds I needed for the cover bands I played in. Anyway - sorry for jumping into the conversation, but something seemed wrong about the "He made that DX7 grand piano sound great. And compared to "grand piano" sounds up to that point in time, it was great." statement. :wink:

Post

wagtunes wrote: Prog rock wasn't the only thing I listened to. I listened to Kraftwerk and Tangerine Dream but there was only so much of them I could take too. Human League was early 80s long after prog rock was pretty much dead. Gristle and Voltaire I never heard of so they must have been pretty underground or just not popular in my neck of the woods.
Human League was 1977. Throbbing Gristle invented industrial music in, I think, 1976, and were soon followed by Cabaret Voltaire. Definitely a different way of using electronics.
But for that matter, the whole industry has changed drastically anyway. I seriously doubt The Beatles would make the splash they did in 1964 today. It's a different world.
This is a sad but probably true statement.
In 1990, things got so bad for me music wise that I stopped buying records completely. There was nothing out there that was worth listening to, IMO.
So I guess you never got into techno, EBM, industrial, or IDM? Then again, this was also the grunge era, which I hated.
Today, believe it or not, I actually like a lot of what's out there. I don't particularly care for the rap based songs (always disliked rap music) but the Taylor Swift and Katy Perry stuff is pretty good. Max Martin is a genius. "Love Me Like You Do" is one of the greatest songs I've heard in years.
My daughter is into all the current pop music, so I've heard a lot of it. Taylor Swift isn't all bad, and I do like Ellie Goulding (especially "Lights"). Lorde also did some interesting stuff.

At any rate, I still love me some analog synths. And some digital synths. And some softsynths. And pretty much anything that can make a noise. Even the lowly DX7 is not without its merits. I'm a huge fan of Diva, but that doesn't stop me from firing up the Andromeda once in a while...
Incomplete list of my gear: 1/8" audio input jack.

Post

wagtunes wrote: But for that matter, the whole industry has changed drastically anyway. I seriously doubt The Beatles would make the splash they did in 1964 today. It's a different world.
Why do you think John, Paul and they mentor George would be incapable to adopt they resonant songwriting/production skills and passion to modern standard?

They were not only able to feed on underground but also always offering something new and exlusive. Changed style 4 times while on popularity on peak. Have enough talant to lead pop race fr more than 10 years. It means something.

Two rock bands I can compare Beatles are Led Zeppelin and Radiohead. Both also permanentely one lap ahead of the race during their carier.

Rafiohead is still in great shape and incredible popular -- speaking of modern rock bands.
Murderous duck!

Post

david.beholder wrote:
wagtunes wrote: But for that matter, the whole industry has changed drastically anyway. I seriously doubt The Beatles would make the splash they did in 1964 today. It's a different world.
Why do you think John, Paul and they mentor George would be incapable to adopt they resonant songwriting/production skills and passion to modern standard?

They were not only able to feed on underground but also always offering something new and exlusive. Changed style 4 times while on popularity on peak. Have enough talant to lead pop race fr more than 10 years. It means something.

Two rock bands I can compare Beatles are Led Zeppelin and Radiohead. Both also permanentely one lap ahead of the race during their carier.

Rafiohead is still in great shape and incredible popular -- speaking of modern rock bands.
I think of Depeche Mode as a better comparison to The Beatles. But the point is that even with all that massive talent, they would have had a lot more difficulty standing out in today's music scene. Being massively talented isn't enough anymore. Maybe you get lucky and a song goes viral, or gets featured in a movie, or a major label decides to pump all their marketing budget into you. Otherwise, you're mostly invisible.
Incomplete list of my gear: 1/8" audio input jack.

Locked

Return to “Instruments”