So there must be a 2nd filter on the Sub37 or maybe errissa made some mistake when recording the samples.aciddose wrote:Nope, for it to be filtered requires it be filtered.
Xhip vs Analog Hardware
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3499 posts since 9 Oct, 2004 from Poland
[====[\\\\\\\\]>------,
Ay caramba !
Ay caramba !
- KVRAF
- 12615 posts since 7 Dec, 2004
Possibly.Mutant wrote:So there must be a 2nd filter on the Sub37 or maybe errissa made some mistake when recording the samples.
If the effect were in the [*] oscillator core as I said it's a bit complex to figure out exactly what would happen without knowing exactly which circuit is used. It is entirely possible to create a low-pass filtered raw waveform, although it is easier to just low-pass filter it elsewhere after the fact. Either way it is a low-pass filter of some order at some frequency.
It might be due to the audio interface too, or who knows.
edit [*] corrected typo "filter" to "oscillator".
Last edited by aciddose on Sun Nov 15, 2015 7:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Free plug-ins for Windows, MacOS and Linux. Xhip Synthesizer v8.0 and Xhip Effects Bundle v6.7.
The coder's credo: We believe our work is neither clever nor difficult; it is done because we thought it would be easy.
Work less; get more done.
The coder's credo: We believe our work is neither clever nor difficult; it is done because we thought it would be easy.
Work less; get more done.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3499 posts since 9 Oct, 2004 from Poland
And i remember having to close the filter a bit too when matching a square wave from this set:
https://soundcloud.com/slightdrift/moog ... oscillator
And a quote from the description:
[conspiracy mode on]Maybe this is the secret of the mythical "warm analog sound" ?

https://soundcloud.com/slightdrift/moog ... oscillator
And a quote from the description:
48,000 Hz 24 bit recordings of Waveforms from the oscillators of several synthesizers with the filter wide open and no resonance.
[conspiracy mode on]Maybe this is the secret of the mythical "warm analog sound" ?
Last edited by Mutant on Wed Nov 11, 2015 12:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
[====[\\\\\\\\]>------,
Ay caramba !
Ay caramba !
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
I fail to understand your excitement because that simple single note does not say much about the sound of a synth. My old SynthEdit synths sounded the same...
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3499 posts since 9 Oct, 2004 from Poland
It is a !*>>>Moog<<<*! oscillator !!!fluffy_little_something wrote:I fail to understand your excitement because that simple single note does not say much about the sound of a synth.
You can't call yourself a synth nerd if you aren't excited about it !!! LOL !
And as i said in my first post here:
Mutant wrote: Of course just the oscillator doesn't make a synth and if i wanted to match the filter i would probably not get so close, but still... it is a perfect match of a Moog oscillator on a freebie VSTi.
Oh so we had perfect emulations of Moog oscillators since almost always ?fluffy_little_something wrote:My old SynthEdit synths sounded the same...
I highly doubt it.
I remember these old SE synths.
[====[\\\\\\\\]>------,
Ay caramba !
Ay caramba !
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
I like synths, but I sure hope I am no synth nerd
Perfect emulations of Moog oscillators? Didn't you yourself say that Xhip doesn't even try to emulate Moog, yet does it perfectly as you claim? Why wouldn't that apply to other synths as well...
Also, with Moog you pay a lot for materials, labor, shipment, the brand name, etc., so you should not expect a Moog to sound much better than a good soft synth just because it costs much more. If the sound is all you are after, a good soft synth will do as well.
Perfect emulations of Moog oscillators? Didn't you yourself say that Xhip doesn't even try to emulate Moog, yet does it perfectly as you claim? Why wouldn't that apply to other synths as well...
Also, with Moog you pay a lot for materials, labor, shipment, the brand name, etc., so you should not expect a Moog to sound much better than a good soft synth just because it costs much more. If the sound is all you are after, a good soft synth will do as well.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3499 posts since 9 Oct, 2004 from Poland
Yes i claim it.fluffy_little_something wrote:Perfect emulations of Moog oscillators? Didn't you yourself say that Xhip doesn't even try to emulate Moog, yet does it perfectly as you claim?
Listen to both clips again if you disagree, download and use all your visual diagnostic tools on them.
But keep in mind that i did not try to emulate the "80hz hump", so it is not there on Xhip clip.
[====[\\\\\\\\]>------,
Ay caramba !
Ay caramba !
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
Oh, I believe you (benefit of the doubt, I am too lazy to do those tests), I just don't share your excitement, even if it were a 100% match.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3499 posts since 9 Oct, 2004 from Poland
It is not a test, the answer is in the names of these files:fluffy_little_something wrote:Oh, I believe you (benefit of the doubt, I am too lazy to do those tests), I just don't share your excitement, even if it were a 100% match.
FirstXhipThenSub37
LXhipRSub37
So you don't have to guess anything and then be embarassed of being wrong (like i was in that Diva thread).
It is not made to prove anything except the possibility to emulate analog with digital in 2015.
And probably other modern soft synths would go about as close too, but with some heavier equalization.
[====[\\\\\\\\]>------,
Ay caramba !
Ay caramba !
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
Oh yes, spare us another "guess which is which - based on patches that don't even try to sound the same" thread
I listened to your first file, since it is only one note, you seem to have fused the two sounds somehow, without any blip, well done
I listened to your first file, since it is only one note, you seem to have fused the two sounds somehow, without any blip, well done
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3499 posts since 9 Oct, 2004 from Poland
The seam is exactly at half of the total length, no crossfade, just glued together at the right place to avoid the click.fluffy_little_something wrote:I listened to your first file, since it is only one note, you seem to have fused the two sounds somehow, without any blip, well done
[====[\\\\\\\\]>------,
Ay caramba !
Ay caramba !
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3499 posts since 9 Oct, 2004 from Poland
Elo again. 
This time it is Xhip vs Jupiter 8.
Found this nice video.
The description says the synth is connected directly to the interface without any effects (i love such raw uneffected analog synth demonstrations on YT).
I liked the sound at 0:59 the most, so i tried to copy it with Xhip.
As almost always left is Xhip, right is the analog.
https://app.box.com/s/klxk2atkilml4habbmucb314gt8q8ro0
(Click on top right to download).
Couldn't get the envelopes right, maybe because they are more linear on the Jupiter and i am using Xhip with nicely curved exponential envelopes.
But the timbre is almost there IMHO.
Boosted some 350hz by ~2 decibels to match the spectrum better, the filter response curve is a tiny bit different on the Jupiter.
And this time it is not a perfect match like earlier with that Moog oscillator, it is just good enough for me, for fun from playing with that sound.
This time it is Xhip vs Jupiter 8.
Found this nice video.
The description says the synth is connected directly to the interface without any effects (i love such raw uneffected analog synth demonstrations on YT).
I liked the sound at 0:59 the most, so i tried to copy it with Xhip.
As almost always left is Xhip, right is the analog.
https://app.box.com/s/klxk2atkilml4habbmucb314gt8q8ro0
(Click on top right to download).
Couldn't get the envelopes right, maybe because they are more linear on the Jupiter and i am using Xhip with nicely curved exponential envelopes.
But the timbre is almost there IMHO.
Boosted some 350hz by ~2 decibels to match the spectrum better, the filter response curve is a tiny bit different on the Jupiter.
And this time it is not a perfect match like earlier with that Moog oscillator, it is just good enough for me, for fun from playing with that sound.
[====[\\\\\\\\]>------,
Ay caramba !
Ay caramba !
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
Sounds more like the left hand/bass on the left side and the right hand on the right side. I don't have a balance knob on my speakers
Anyway, the Vangelis sound is a typical sound where good oscillators and filters become evident. One reason why I like Sylenth, it does such sounds very well, even with just two single saw waves and without any effects. The only thing typical of the J8 Sylenth lacks is the iconic sync sound and normal PW control. I hope they will add that sooner or later.
Anyway, the Vangelis sound is a typical sound where good oscillators and filters become evident. One reason why I like Sylenth, it does such sounds very well, even with just two single saw waves and without any effects. The only thing typical of the J8 Sylenth lacks is the iconic sync sound and normal PW control. I hope they will add that sooner or later.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3499 posts since 9 Oct, 2004 from Poland
OK so this time i am not trying to match it anymore (just normalized both to 0 which ofc didnt make them equally loud), i wanted more "grit" and "growl" on the bass.
Not a L/R split this time, first is gritty, growly Xhip, then smoother and little bit less agressive Jupiter.
https://app.box.com/s/aaxvu81u57i4esvxpkz24ttpjdrybda9
I like this sound more, i am not sure why.
Maybe in my mind it sounds like it is overdriven by some vintage vacuum tube device, while it isn't.
This of course doesn't mean that i like Xhip more than Jupiter (they have different strenghts and weaknesses) - and i would have to put my hands on the hardware to check if that grittyness was also possible there.
Not a L/R split this time, first is gritty, growly Xhip, then smoother and little bit less agressive Jupiter.
https://app.box.com/s/aaxvu81u57i4esvxpkz24ttpjdrybda9
I like this sound more, i am not sure why.
Maybe in my mind it sounds like it is overdriven by some vintage vacuum tube device, while it isn't.
This of course doesn't mean that i like Xhip more than Jupiter (they have different strenghts and weaknesses) - and i would have to put my hands on the hardware to check if that grittyness was also possible there.
[====[\\\\\\\\]>------,
Ay caramba !
Ay caramba !
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
I think you might change the filter key follow, the filter seems more closed on lower octaves on the Jupiter.
Additionally, if there is a key follow control for the amp, it might make sense to make the lower octaves louder relative to the higher ones.
The detuning might also contribute to the different roughness.
Additionally, if there is a key follow control for the amp, it might make sense to make the lower octaves louder relative to the higher ones.
The detuning might also contribute to the different roughness.
Last edited by fluffy_little_something on Sun Nov 15, 2015 4:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
