Why the latest review of Synthmaster was deleted? [It appeared again]

[Numanoid]

Oh! It appeared now again! with 5 as rating instead of 1 (good progress I think).

Could it be stuck in some time dilation field, warping in and out of this dimension?

[liquidsound]

Oh! It appeared now again! with 5 as rating instead of 1 (good progress I think).

Could it be stuck in some time dilation field, warping in and out of this dimension?

And it's multiplying itself!!!! From 1 to 5 in a day! We are being taking over from another dimension

[chk071]

Let's be honest. All those 9 or 10 out of 10 reviews is something the world doesn't need. Just fair that there's some reviewing the synth also when it was disapointing to them. We need more of those reviews. 5/10 is already a satisfactory conclusion. "Didn't like" is 4/10 or lower.

[EnGee]

Oh! It appeared now again! with 5 as rating instead of 1 (good progress I think).

Could it be stuck in some time dilation field, warping in and out of this dimension?

Yeh! Maybe it was affected by the energy of the collision of the two black hole suns recently (just billion years ago)

Let's be honest. All those 9 or 10 out of 10 reviews is something the world doesn't need. Just fair that there's some reviewing the synth also when it was disapointing to them. We need more of those reviews. 5/10 is already a satisfactory conclusion. "Didn't like" is 4/10 or lower.

I agree with you about the rating. I mean, for me 5-6 and above are indication of something not bad, 7 is good and 8 is very good, 9 is great and 10 is perfect! But I believe in the rating of each section more. So, for example, my rating for SynthMaster would be:
Interface: 5.5
Design: 6.5
Sound: 8
Stability: 6.5
Support: 8
Value for Money: 9
Over all rating: 7.25 (average ratio of the above)
Breaking them to sections are more logical and informative, and from that points it is good to extend the every point and then have a conclusion with overall rating. What I read from the review is taking only the negative side that the reviewer has experienced from some sections only (GUI, Stability) but there is no talking about how the sound is or support or the value for money. Still, it will balance the overall rating with the 10/10 reviews IMO.

[JJ_Jettflow]

Oh! It appeared now again! with 5 as rating instead of 1 (good progress I think).

Could it be stuck in some time dilation field, warping in and out of this dimension?

Yeh! Maybe it was affected by the energy of the collision of the two black hole suns recently (just billion years ago)

Let's be honest. All those 9 or 10 out of 10 reviews is something the world doesn't need. Just fair that there's some reviewing the synth also when it was disapointing to them. We need more of those reviews. 5/10 is already a satisfactory conclusion. "Didn't like" is 4/10 or lower.

I agree with you about the rating. I mean, for me 5-6 and above are indication of something not bad, 7 is good and 8 is very good, 9 is great and 10 is perfect! But I believe in the rating of each section more. So, for example, my rating for SynthMaster would be:
Interface: 5.5
Design: 6.5
Sound: 8
Stability: 6.5
Support: 8
Value for Money: 9
Over all rating: 7.25 (average ratio of the above)
Breaking them to sections are more logical and informative, and from that points it is good to extend the every point and then have a conclusion with overall rating. What I read from the review is taking only the negative side that the reviewer has experienced from some sections only (GUI, Stability) but there is no talking about how the sound is or support or the value for money. Still, it will balance the overall rating with the 10/10 reviews IMO.

+1

A breakdown would be really god.

[JJ_Jettflow]

Oh! It appeared now again! with 5 as rating instead of 1 (good progress I think).

Could it be stuck in some time dilation field, warping in and out of this dimension?

Yeh! Maybe it was affected by the energy of the collision of the two black hole suns recently (just billion years ago)

Let's be honest. All those 9 or 10 out of 10 reviews is something the world doesn't need. Just fair that there's some reviewing the synth also when it was disapointing to them. We need more of those reviews. 5/10 is already a satisfactory conclusion. "Didn't like" is 4/10 or lower.

I agree with you about the rating. I mean, for me 5-6 and above are indication of something not bad, 7 is good and 8 is very good, 9 is great and 10 is perfect! But I believe in the rating of each section more. So, for example, my rating for SynthMaster would be:
Interface: 5.5
Design: 6.5
Sound: 8
Stability: 6.5
Support: 8
Value for Money: 9
Over all rating: 7.25 (average ratio of the above)
Breaking them to sections are more logical and informative, and from that points it is good to extend the every point and then have a conclusion with overall rating. What I read from the review is taking only the negative side that the reviewer has experienced from some sections only (GUI, Stability) but there is no talking about how the sound is or support or the value for money. Still, it will balance the overall rating with the 10/10 reviews IMO.

+1

A breakdown would be really good.

[chk071]

True, would be nice. Like, you can click how many points you want to give for the respective sections. Could also think about letting people vote without a review, so you can give points only. I don't know how much potential for abuse there would be then though.