u-he

Shiek927 · Post by **Shiek927** » Mon May 16, 2016 2:10 pm

Basic question, but is this going to be added to Diva or will it be a separate synth? :3

Howard · Post by **Howard** » Mon May 16, 2016 3:25 pm

separate synth

ATN69 · Post by **ATN69** » Mon May 16, 2016 4:00 pm

Hi Howard.

Any estimated timetable for the completion of that separate synth? ..or you have no deadline maybe?
RePro sounds like a dream come true so I already expect that synth to be spectacular

Cyoon · Post by **Cyoon** » Mon May 16, 2016 4:17 pm

ATN69 wrote:Hi Howard.

Any estimated timetable for the completion of that separate synth?

this year

ATN69 · Post by **ATN69** » Mon May 16, 2016 4:20 pm

Suloo wrote:
ATN69 wrote:Hi Howard.

Any estimated timetable for the completion of that separate synth?
this year

Sounds great! Time to save up some cash then

Shiek927 · Post by **Shiek927** » Thu May 19, 2016 1:05 am

Howard wrote:separate synth

Oh! I actually didn't expect that

.

david.beholder · Post by **david.beholder** » Thu May 19, 2016 1:09 am

Howard wrote:separate synth

But what about Diva Module?

zerocrossing · Post by **zerocrossing** » Thu May 19, 2016 2:05 am

david.beholder wrote:
Howard wrote:separate synth
But what about Diva Module?

Earlier in the thread Urs said he didn't feel it would work in the context of Diva. I still think the filter should at least find it's way in. I'd really love it in Zebra.

Shiek927 · Post by **Shiek927** » Thu May 19, 2016 2:40 am

zerocrossing wrote:
david.beholder wrote:
Howard wrote:separate synth
But what about Diva Module?
Earlier in the thread Urs said he didn't feel it would work in the context of Diva. I still think the filter should at least find it's way in. I'd really love it in Zebra.

I'm honestly surprised. It already has a very vintage similar-ish sound to all of the Diva Modules, that it sounds like a natural fit. But I guess they know what they're doing ^^.

Cyoon · Post by **Cyoon** » Thu May 19, 2016 8:20 am

Diva is polyphonic, but RePro will be a monophonic synth. Different pair of shoes.

Funkybot's Evil Twin · Thu May 19, 2016 4:00 pm

david.beholder wrote:
Howard wrote:separate synth
But what about Diva Module?

The filter could work as a Diva module, but I believe Urs said the Pro One's modulation system wouldn't fit into the Diva paradigm. So it could be possible that something from this development ends up in Diva, but at no point will Diva be a Pro-One.

david.beholder · Post by **david.beholder** » Thu May 19, 2016 10:16 pm

Funkybot's Evil Twin wrote:
david.beholder wrote:
Howard wrote:separate synth
But what about Diva Module?
The filter could work as a Diva module, but I believe Urs said the Pro One's modulation system wouldn't fit into the Diva paradigm. So it could be possible that something from this development ends up in Diva, but at no point will Diva be a Pro-One.

Right, that's exactly what I recall Urs said too. May be Howard and Urs are out of sync?

I'd rather be surprised not to see it in Diva because I prefer things to be concentrated in one. I think it would make perfect addition to existing Diva modules / willing to pay for Diva upgrades / prefer one plugin to many / etc etc

Urs · Post by **Urs** » Fri May 20, 2016 2:20 pm

Based on the current set of models I think we'll be able to build the Synthex filter for Diva. Same filter chip as the Pro-One, but different circuitry around it.

For Diva however we don't want to add too much complexity, i.e. no selection of different calibrations, no crazy modulation depths, no multi i/o. This is why we want to do Repro-1 as a separate product, so we can do all of these things without compromising Diva's concept. And of course, we see a market for a classy emulations of a mono synth.

glokraw · Post by **glokraw** » Sun May 22, 2016 3:02 am

What about reprofitting Filterscape?

Urs · Post by **Urs** » Sun May 22, 2016 9:09 am

glokraw wrote:What about reprofitting Filterscape?

Once we find the spare time (also accounts for Uhbik, ACE and MFM2)

u-he

KVR Audio

[ANN] Repro-1