Bug in Mux VST??? (Solved)

Official support for: mutools.com
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Hi Jo,

I was playin around a bit with the Multisampla in Reaper and found something strange...:

If using the Multisampla device, everything is fine... processor usage on my machine about 0.3%...
If using the multisampla module in a polysynth to built a custom sampler the processor usage adds with every played note without releasing ... I ended up with the same multisample at about 1.8%, which were hold until I deleted the VSTi instance...
Attached a simple test file, which behaves that way I described...
Multisampletest.zip
Perhaps you can have look at this...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by Trancit on Fri Oct 28, 2016 1:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top

Post

Hi Trancit,
I gave a quick look at your patch ,missing a main envelope.
I corrected and attached your patch.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Top

Post

Sorry, I don´t get it...

What you did different... what do you mean with "main envelope"????

Edit says there is a big change since I played around with this lately... found it :wink:

Jo, when did you put this into the menu????
Top

Post

I'm sorry if I have not explained,
in the moular area I set the amplifier envelope to main envelope.

http://www.mutools.com/info/docs/mux/polysynth.html
"The Main Envelope can be set by right-clicking an envelope and choosing "Set As Main Envelope".
If no Main Envelope is set then chance is high that voices will take much longer to finish (depending on the patch) resulting in much more cpu usage than necessary."

Edit:OK,happy that you solved :)
Top

Post

Yeah, have seen it...

You know what... I used MUX since I don´t know how many years and never noticed this... :lol: :hihi:
Top

Post

That option is there from the start ;)
Wish i could leave that option out though, but did not yet find a better way.
Feel free to make suggestions.
Top

Post

Trancit wrote:Yeah, have seen it...

You know what... I used MUX since I don´t know how many years and never noticed this... :lol: :hihi:
Old dog...new tricks :hihi:
Beauty is only skin deep,
Ugliness, however, goes right the way through
Top

Post

mutools wrote:That option is there from the start ;)
Wish i could leave that option out though, but did not yet find a better way.
Feel free to make suggestions.
Don´t know, but something this important (even I didn´t noticed this before) should perhaps have a checkbox on the main device panel

Second: I am pretty sure, I never set this option but if I have a look at my older i.e. Silencio patches, there is always one envelope set as main envelope...
Was there something automatic magic before or did you edit my patches (prior V6)???
Top

Post

bibz1st wrote: Old dog...new tricks :hihi:
Best example that you never complete training :D
Top

Post

Trancit wrote:
bibz1st wrote: Old dog...new tricks :hihi:
Best example that you never complete training :D
Absolutely agree

wrt Main Envelope, if using the Polysynth Module I think that the Amp Envelope is set already so there would be no need to do it manually or indeed worry about it.
Beauty is only skin deep,
Ugliness, however, goes right the way through
Top

Post

bibz1st wrote: wrt Main Envelope, if using the Polysynth Module I think that the Amp Envelope is set already so there would be no need to do it manually or indeed worry about it.
Yeah, that´s possible that I built Silencio from a Polysynth were it was already set...
Top
Post Reply

Return to “MuTools”