MReverb decay tail
- KVRist
- 46 posts since 6 Sep, 2013 from Barcelona, Spain
Is it me or MReverb has very short decay tail time. When I set it even to 30s the decay sounds more like 8 seconds. Any thoughts welcome!
-
Chandlerhimself Chandlerhimself https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=318799
- KVRAF
- 1821 posts since 19 Dec, 2013 from Japan
I have noticed the same thing. The tail seems much shorter than what the decay setting says.
My Youtube page https://www.youtube.com/user/GuitarChandler
-
Sampleconstruct Sampleconstruct https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=191286
- KVRAF
- 16780 posts since 12 Oct, 2008 from Here and there
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- 14339 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
True, it doesn't work very well really, it's pretty hard to make it all work while making the spatial positioning system work at the same time.
But the good news is that MTurboReverb is nearly done
. There won't be spatial positioning, but lots of other stuff, and imho it sounds awesome
.
But the good news is that MTurboReverb is nearly done
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 46 posts since 6 Sep, 2013 from Barcelona, Spain
Cool! Looking forward to MTurboReverb!
My goal is to have a reverb plugin that sounds like MAGMA's PurpleVerb, without eating so many resources, but sounding as good with the modulation and so. Which sounds from outer space (I do ambient music).
My goal is to have a reverb plugin that sounds like MAGMA's PurpleVerb, without eating so many resources, but sounding as good with the modulation and so. Which sounds from outer space (I do ambient music).
- KVRian
- 1059 posts since 28 Jun, 2006 from Germany
MeldaProduction wrote:But the good news is that MTurboReverb is nearly done
Now I am very curious! Looking forward to test it!
System: Win 10 64 bit / i9 9900K (8x 3.6 GHz) / 16 GB DDR4-3200 RAM / 1TB M.2 SSD + 2x 500 GB SSD / RME Babyface / Reaper
Tagirijus.de
Tagirijus.de
-
Chandlerhimself Chandlerhimself https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=318799
- KVRAF
- 1821 posts since 19 Dec, 2013 from Japan
Mmmm. Tell us more. Before you talked about a reverb based on raytracing, is this it, or is that something else? Is this going to be like the other Turbo series, meaning it will be able to model other reverbs, or is it a completely new concept?MeldaProduction wrote:True, it doesn't work very well really, it's pretty hard to make it all work while making the spatial positioning system work at the same time.
But the good news is that MTurboReverb is nearly done. There won't be spatial positioning, but lots of other stuff, and imho it sounds awesome
.
My Youtube page https://www.youtube.com/user/GuitarChandler
- KVRian
- 1094 posts since 23 Sep, 2006
Yeah, the turbos previously have been emulations. I'm hoping this is just a better, more interesting reverb rather than an emulation.
Either way, I'm looking forward to this!
Either way, I'm looking forward to this!
-
- KVRist
- 147 posts since 8 May, 2015
But I hope it has Bricasti-quality and smoothness in it's tails

-PC: Threadripper gen3 3200, 128Gig RAM, Windows 10/64bit, SDD HDs, RME UCX, Geforce GTX 1050Ti, Reason 12, Wavelab9, MTotalBundle, 2 Acer Touchscreens-
- KVRian
- 1094 posts since 23 Sep, 2006
I was hoping this would drop this weekend
Anywho, looks like Fabfilter is about to drop their new reverb plugin too, Pro R.
Will be interesting to see how this, the melda one and Zynaptiq Adaptiverb all compare. I'll probably stick with the Melda one because of MXXX and the flexibility, but it'll be interesting to compare.
Anywho, looks like Fabfilter is about to drop their new reverb plugin too, Pro R.
Will be interesting to see how this, the melda one and Zynaptiq Adaptiverb all compare. I'll probably stick with the Melda one because of MXXX and the flexibility, but it'll be interesting to compare.
-
MirkoVanHauten MirkoVanHauten https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=376111
- KVRist
- 457 posts since 12 Mar, 2016
If MTurboReverb will follow the same concept as MTurboEQ and MTurboComp then there will be nothing new or innovative, just (more or less good) emulations which might be realised by switching IRs
So imo it would not be really comparable to Pro-R or Adaptiverb which are algorithmic and highly optimised on workflow and sound. They are based on real problems in music production and offer a possibility to solve them. Like seen in the teaser the fabfilter plugin has already shown at least one further developed feature.
The MTurbo series is a collection of copies (I have nothing against that, everybody has to decide that for itself
I've decided to go with the originals) with high compromises to generate a common base & interface. That's why I can't go with these.
The MTurbo series is a collection of copies (I have nothing against that, everybody has to decide that for itself
It runs on my machine! Everything else is undefined behavior.
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 46 posts since 6 Sep, 2013 from Barcelona, Spain
Well, I tried the hyped adaptiverb and still don't see why so much goodness talk about it, it has ridiculous latency and and 1 instance uses 40-60% of my i7 3.33gHz. The best reverb I have right now is MAGMA's PurpleVerb, 0 latency and below 10% of cpu...
- KVRAF
- 2702 posts since 9 Jul, 2015 from UK
There are already lots of IRs in MConvolution that are emulations. I doubt very much that MTurboReverb will be IRs. Vojtech said he was working on a new algorithmic reverb.MirkoVanHauten wrote:If MTurboReverb will follow the same concept as MTurboEQ and MTurboComp then there will be nothing new or innovative, just (more or less good) emulations which might be realised by switching IRsSo imo it would not be really comparable to Pro-R or Adaptiverb which are algorithmic and highly optimised on workflow and sound. They are based on real problems in music production and offer a possibility to solve them. Like seen in the teaser the fabfilter plugin has already shown at least one further developed feature.
The MTurbo series is a collection of copies (I have nothing against that, everybody has to decide that for itselfI've decided to go with the originals) with high compromises to generate a common base & interface. That's why I can't go with these.
If we look at MTurboComp, he had to make a super complex compressor in order for it to be able to emulate the data captured from machine learning. It ended up with fast easy to use emulations on the easy screen, with the most powerful compressor I have ever seen/used under the hood!
It would be nice if the same happened here with MTurboReverb.
Jason @ Melda Production
- KVRian
- 1059 posts since 28 Jun, 2006 from Germany
I also did not get the Adaptiverb Hype, haha. By the way, just in case you (or the others) did not know: Valhalla offers unbelievable great reverbs with superb sound, low prices and very low CPU consumption. Long time I switched to 2cAudio Breeze, but some month ago, I switched back to Valhalla Room for orchestral reverberation. I even got Valhalla Plate, which offers huge and lush verbs - great for ambiences. Loving them. So I am really curious about MTurboVerb! I use nearly everything from Meldaproduction for all my effects ... except the reverb.Grunwaldt wrote:Well, I tried the hyped adaptiverb and still don't see why so much goodness talk about it, it has ridiculous latency and and 1 instance uses 40-60% of my i7 3.33gHz. The best reverb I have right now is MAGMA's PurpleVerb, 0 latency and below 10% of cpu...
System: Win 10 64 bit / i9 9900K (8x 3.6 GHz) / 16 GB DDR4-3200 RAM / 1TB M.2 SSD + 2x 500 GB SSD / RME Babyface / Reaper
Tagirijus.de
Tagirijus.de

