Oh, sorry, i was ambiguous: A release *during* Superbooth is not likely. Meaning, the release itself is very likely, just at a later time. Too much stuff to clean up, and Repro-5 isn't even far enough to start preset design.aaron aardvark wrote:Urs,I wrote:Hehehe, we'll show *something*, but a release isn't likely. Same for Repro-5 which we hope to showcase as well.
I'm not sure if you are saying Repro-5 isn't likely for ever being released, or likely for eventual release. Not sure why you would show it off if you don't ever release it.
Zebra3 Info
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30194 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
-
aaron aardvark aaron aardvark https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=248508
- KVRAF
- 3061 posts since 22 Jan, 2011 from near Los Angeles
Urs,
Good to hear the release of Repro-5 is very likely. Is it too soon to say whether it is a separate product from Repro-1, or a free update for Repro-1 owners, or cost a bit extra for existing Repro-1 owners?
Good to hear the release of Repro-5 is very likely. Is it too soon to say whether it is a separate product from Repro-1, or a free update for Repro-1 owners, or cost a bit extra for existing Repro-1 owners?
You can hear my original music at this link: https://www.soundclick.com/artist/defau ... dID=224436
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30194 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Thing is, I'm afraid to unveil our exact plans before it's finished, or at least until Repro-5 is at a point where we can post specs and screenshots. Otherwise we'd see more and more people buying Repro-1 today based on expectations that Repro-5 might not meet. After all, there is a reason Repro-1 is not polyphonic, and in order to get it there a lot of features had to be dropped. We're trying to compensate that with other features, but still... it isn't exactly the same synth.aaron aardvark wrote:Urs,
Good to hear the release of Repro-5 is very likely. Is it too soon to say whether it is a separate product from Repro-1, or a free update for Repro-1 owners, or cost a bit extra for existing Repro-1 owners?
-
- KVRian
- 724 posts since 15 Feb, 2012 from France
Much more impatient about Zebra2.8 than Repro-5 TBH
Just bought Z2 a couple of weeks ago, and am waiting for the new version to fully dive into it (and to print the manual ah! I guess I'm much more oldschool when it comes to reading than patching synths hehe).
Meanwhile, Bazille keeps me busy.
Just bought Z2 a couple of weeks ago, and am waiting for the new version to fully dive into it (and to print the manual ah! I guess I'm much more oldschool when it comes to reading than patching synths hehe).
Meanwhile, Bazille keeps me busy.
- KVRAF
- 4197 posts since 23 May, 2004 from Bad Vilbel, Germany
nilhartman wrote:...and to print the manual ah! I guess I'm much more oldschool when it comes to reading than patching synths...
-
- Banned
- 3889 posts since 3 Feb, 2010
I think there are already people who bought with that expectationUrs wrote:Thing is, I'm afraid to unveil our exact plans before it's finished, or at least until Repro-5 is at a point where we can post specs and screenshots. Otherwise we'd see more and more people buying Repro-1 today based on expectations that Repro-5 might not meet. After all, there is a reason Repro-1 is not polyphonic, and in order to get it there a lot of features had to be dropped. We're trying to compensate that with other features, but still... it isn't exactly the same synth.aaron aardvark wrote:Urs,
Good to hear the release of Repro-5 is very likely. Is it too soon to say whether it is a separate product from Repro-1, or a free update for Repro-1 owners, or cost a bit extra for existing Repro-1 owners?
maybe for users who bought first month to at the release to get plugin "upgrade"
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30194 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Yes, and wherever the question came up, I told them not toElektronisch wrote:I think there are already people who bought with that expectation
-
- Banned
- 3889 posts since 3 Feb, 2010
well i could argue with that as it was more like "you dont know what you might miss later"Urs wrote:Yes, and wherever the question came up, I told them not toElektronisch wrote:I think there are already people who bought with that expectation
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30194 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Well, we figured out how to let people demo it first, before they get on board - for the same conditions as those who bought Repro-1 without knowing what they'd get. Only of course, latter have Repro-1 for a few months earlier and hopefully put it to good use!Elektronisch wrote:well i could argue with that as it was more like "you dont know what you might miss later"Urs wrote:Yes, and wherever the question came up, I told them not toElektronisch wrote:I think there are already people who bought with that expectationnevertheless those who dont risk dont drink champagne
-
aaron aardvark aaron aardvark https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=248508
- KVRAF
- 3061 posts since 22 Jan, 2011 from near Los Angeles
Urs,Urs wrote:Thing is, I'm afraid to unveil our exact plans before it's finished, or at least until Repro-5 is at a point where we can post specs and screenshots. Otherwise we'd see more and more people buying Repro-1 today based on expectations that Repro-5 might not meet. After all, there is a reason Repro-1 is not polyphonic, and in order to get it there a lot of features had to be dropped. We're trying to compensate that with other features, but still... it isn't exactly the same synth.aaron aardvark wrote:Urs,
Good to hear the release of Repro-5 is very likely. Is it too soon to say whether it is a separate product from Repro-1, or a free update for Repro-1 owners, or cost a bit extra for existing Repro-1 owners?
It certainly would be nice if you had a Unison mode if Repro-5 becomes a product, especially if you can't have all of Repro-1's nice effects (OK, I see you answered that in another thread). Though I think Repro-5 should at least have a delay effect.
You can hear my original music at this link: https://www.soundclick.com/artist/defau ... dID=224436
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30194 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
The only effect we're likely to drop/replace is JAWS. It's too CPU consuming for per-voice distortion and out of that is just plain noise. Lyrebird, ResQ, Drench and Sonic Conditioner will probably remain in Repro-5 as they are in Repro-1.aaron aardvark wrote: Urs,
It certainly would be nice if you had a Unison mode if Repro-5 becomes a product, especially if you can't have all of Repro-1's nice effects (OK, I see you answered that in another thread). Though I think Repro-5 should at least have a delay effect.
-
- KVRAF
- 5201 posts since 16 Nov, 2014
But if i understand that JAWS might come to Zebra 2.8. Or did i misunderstood that maybe then?Urs wrote:The only effect we're likely to drop/replace is JAWS. It's too CPU consuming for per-voice distortion and out of that is just plain noise. Lyrebird, ResQ, Drench and Sonic Conditioner will probably remain in Repro-5 as they are in Repro-1.aaron aardvark wrote: Urs,
It certainly would be nice if you had a Unison mode if Repro-5 becomes a product, especially if you can't have all of Repro-1's nice effects (OK, I see you answered that in another thread). Though I think Repro-5 should at least have a delay effect.
- KVRAF
- 24414 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
Zebra 2.8 will get two wavefolders, yes. 
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30194 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
They're not exactly the same though. The Zebra one has a few more features but it doesn't have the built-in modulations.
