I'm just a crap hobbyist. I'll stick to crap parts that don't make me special because I own them. Maybe one day I'll be cool and spend $10k on a power cable. Until then I'll just have to settle for one of these. https://www.walmart.com/ip/Insten-INSTE ... s/36215826ghettosynth wrote:Yes, I was totally reluctant to recommend it, because I agree, so many of these claims are clearly based on dubious science. However, I feel that the OP might be the discerning and serious engineer that an appreciate a next-level product like The Wire.
are you?
Audio interface : does it really affect quality ?
- KVRAF
- 4141 posts since 11 Aug, 2006 from Texas
Feel free to call me Brian.
-
- KVRAF
- 3506 posts since 12 May, 2011
Best thread for a long time. Love it.
-
- KVRAF
- 5575 posts since 30 May, 2006 from Hollow Earth
A good pair of Q-tips.
Done.
Done.
ABEFLGMOPPRRST 
- KVRAF
- 16846 posts since 8 Mar, 2005 from Utrecht, Holland
I think it's a good question though, and it needs a proper answer.
* between 20Hz and 20kHz (which is the regular audible range, no surprise there)
* there are no peaks in the spectrum but there can be attennuations of -0.5dB (usually in the extreme low & high frequencies)
Dynamic range is basically the difference in loudness between the loudest possible signal and the softest (before it drowns into background noise)
THD (total harmonic distortion) should be zero for perfection. These are frequencies present in the output of the component that were not present in the input. In normal words: distortion.
Being 16bit their dynamic range is limited to about 96dB and this also limits THD to something like 0.01%. So your "cheap" interface doesn't have the dynamic range that the expensice RME product has, but if you press it's recordings to CD then "something" (one single bit of resolution) is lost.
Feels a lot better now, right?
May I ask why? If you connect it over USB, you get a direct copy of the digital audio without any loss.NotreDame wrote:I have a Virus TI2, while I would like to connect it within an audio interface (Lexicon Alpha)
The answer is to look at the technical specifications of your interface:NotreDame wrote:How does audio interface affect sound ?
Maybe for illustration compare it with the specs of an interface that costs several times more (the RME BabyFace)Lexicon wrote:Line Inputs
Frequency Response: +0, −0.5 dB 20 Hz - 20 kHz, ref. 1kHz
THD+N: <.009% A/D, 20 Hz - 20 kHz
Dynamic Range:
A/D (24 Bit) 100 dB typical, A-weighted, 20 Hz - 20 kHz
D/A (24 Bit) 100 dB typical, A-weighted, 20 Hz - 20 kHz
A/D/A (24 Bit) 97 dB typical, A-weighted, 20 Hz - 20 kHz
The frequency response ought to be flat. Since perfectly flat does not exist, it is only flat within certain limits:RME wrote:Frequency response AD, -0.5 dB: 50 Hz 20.9 kHz (sf 44.1 kHz)
Dynamic range AD: 108 dB RMS unweighted, 111 dBA
Dynamic range DA: 112 dB RMS unweighted, 115 dBA
THD+N AD: < -98 dB (< 0.0012 %)
THD+N DA: < -100 dB (< 0.001%)
* between 20Hz and 20kHz (which is the regular audible range, no surprise there)
* there are no peaks in the spectrum but there can be attennuations of -0.5dB (usually in the extreme low & high frequencies)
Dynamic range is basically the difference in loudness between the loudest possible signal and the softest (before it drowns into background noise)
THD (total harmonic distortion) should be zero for perfection. These are frequencies present in the output of the component that were not present in the input. In normal words: distortion.
For reference: compact disks sound good. Right?NotreDame wrote:Is it audible ? Can we hear the loss of quality ? Or do we loss about 2-3 purcents of the sound ?
Being 16bit their dynamic range is limited to about 96dB and this also limits THD to something like 0.01%. So your "cheap" interface doesn't have the dynamic range that the expensice RME product has, but if you press it's recordings to CD then "something" (one single bit of resolution) is lost.
Feels a lot better now, right?
We are the KVR collective. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated. 
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
-
Mister Natural Mister Natural https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=164174
- KVRAF
- 2892 posts since 28 Oct, 2007 from michigan
I'm gonna have to call BS on the idea that "hi-quality" digital cables sound superior to common Sam's Club digital cables. The D/A converters inside the interface don't have to convert anything and passes the digital signal along to the ASIO converter inside your computer. I know that there has long been conversation that better copper sounds superior to cheap copper within cables but I respectfully disagree. Copper is copper and bits are bits.ghettosynth wrote:Yeah, not so sure, this is really going to depend on the quality of your interconnects, no? I mean, ok, if you're using a high quality USB cable like the audioquest diamond, maybe...
The only qualifier I'd recommend is if you're gigging night after night. Plugging and unplugging, stepping on this line or dropping it. In such a case; you'd want to have heavy-duty cable jacketing and strong terminations.
peace
expert only on what it feels like to be me
-
- KVRAF
- 16801 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
http://www.tnt-audio.com/accessories/di ... les_e.htmlMister Natural wrote:I'm gonna have to call BS on the idea that "hi-quality" digital cables sound superior to common Sam's Club digital cables. The D/A converters inside the interface don't have to convert anything and passes the digital signal along to the ASIO converter inside your computer. I know that there has long been conversation that better copper sounds superior to cheap copper within cables but I respectfully disagree. Copper is copper and bits are bits.ghettosynth wrote:Yeah, not so sure, this is really going to depend on the quality of your interconnects, no? I mean, ok, if you're using a high quality USB cable like the audioquest diamond, maybe...
The only qualifier I'd recommend is if you're gigging night after night. Plugging and unplugging, stepping on this line or dropping it. In such a case; you'd want to have heavy-duty cable jacketing and strong terminations.
peace
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 112 posts since 22 May, 2017
Thanks a lot Bertkoor !
But here is a strange thing : I planned to buy a Roland UA-55 Quad Capture.
But when I read its specs, the frequency response is : +0, -2 db !!
My lexicon Alpha wich cost me nearly 1 quarter of the UA-55 price (60 dollars vs 220 dollars)has only -0,5 db.
Did I miss something or does it really mean that the Alpha lexicon can provide a far more flat sound than the Roland one ?
But here is a strange thing : I planned to buy a Roland UA-55 Quad Capture.
But when I read its specs, the frequency response is : +0, -2 db !!
My lexicon Alpha wich cost me nearly 1 quarter of the UA-55 price (60 dollars vs 220 dollars)has only -0,5 db.
Did I miss something or does it really mean that the Alpha lexicon can provide a far more flat sound than the Roland one ?
- KVRAF
- 16846 posts since 8 Mar, 2005 from Utrecht, Holland
Possibly the freq response plot looks something like this:

I'd rather have the card with the red curve because of the ripples you see at the green curve.
So somewhere in the 20Hz-20kHz range there is a cutoff of -2dB, but not in a region where it's that important. The figures say nothing about the squiggliness of the lines, only within what box they fall.

I'd rather have the card with the red curve because of the ripples you see at the green curve.
So somewhere in the 20Hz-20kHz range there is a cutoff of -2dB, but not in a region where it's that important. The figures say nothing about the squiggliness of the lines, only within what box they fall.
We are the KVR collective. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated. 
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
-
- KVRAF
- 16801 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
Woah! That's a lot of variation!NotreDame wrote:Thanks a lot Bertkoor !
But here is a strange thing : I planned to buy a Roland UA-55 Quad Capture.
But when I read its specs, the frequency response is : +0, -2 db !!
- KVRAF
- 12615 posts since 7 Dec, 2004

Free plug-ins for Windows, MacOS and Linux. Xhip Synthesizer v8.0 and Xhip Effects Bundle v6.7.
The coder's credo: We believe our work is neither clever nor difficult; it is done because we thought it would be easy.
Work less; get more done.
The coder's credo: We believe our work is neither clever nor difficult; it is done because we thought it would be easy.
Work less; get more done.
-
- KVRAF
- 16801 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
Well, you get what you pay for, amiright?aciddose wrote:
-
Mister Natural Mister Natural https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=164174
- KVRAF
- 2892 posts since 28 Oct, 2007 from michigan
expert only on what it feels like to be me
-
- KVRian
- 1148 posts since 29 Jun, 2012
Expensive cabling is all well and good, but to squeeze even more out of those high-end cables, you gotta get serious:
http://www.machinadynamica.com/machina31.htm
http://www.machinadynamica.com/machina31.htm
-
- KVRAF
- 16801 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
Well, I suppose, if you're on a budget perhaps. These do a much better job.ontol wrote:Expensive cabling is all well and good, but to squeeze even more out of those high-end cables, you gotta get serious:
http://www.machinadynamica.com/machina31.htm
http://www.shakti-innovations.com/product/shakti-stone/