Of course let's switch our DAW that we know inside out for years because we desperately want to use one 32bit VST.Pyrotek45 wrote:There no point in switching to 64bit. If your daw forces you to, find a new daw. 32 programs and 64 bit programs sound identical. Only difference is 64bit can use more ram. That doesn't really help vsts unless its sound libraries amd sample devices.
Yet people tell Adam the same thing about flowstone. See the double standard? Everyone wants adam to switch coding platform but no one wants to a switch daws. Seema hypocritical to me. If people dont want to switch daws they have no right telling adam to switch Coding platforms.2ZrgE wrote:Of course let's switch our DAW that we know inside out for years because we desperately want to use one 32bit VST.Pyrotek45 wrote:There no point in switching to 64bit. If your daw forces you to, find a new daw. 32 programs and 64 bit programs sound identical. Only difference is 64bit can use more ram. That doesn't really help vsts unless its sound libraries amd sample devices.
But hey, there's an alternative...
The customer is always right.Pyrotek45 wrote:Yet people tell Adam the same thing about flowstone. See the double standard? Everyone wants adam to switch coding platform but no one wants to a switch daws. Seema hypocritical to me. If people dont want to switch daws they have no right telling adam to switch Coding platforms.
No, I think you have 2 options: Dont use it, or use it with Jbridge. Problem f**king solved4damind wrote: I think you have 2 different options:
Yes, Virus C which was perhaps the most iconic synth at the time, it had only the classic oscillators, yet it was the most popular legendary hardware synth. Viper has nearly everything that a Virus C has,but has the Hypersaw too (which came with the Virus Ti), and more features are planned after 1.00, but I had to draw the line somewhere, I could develop it forever without ever releasing it.recursive one wrote:Ok, upon release Viper won't do everything what Virus does but actually about 70% of the unique Virus sound is in its fiters and effects which seem to be properly modelled. These pads, plucks, fat basses and floating arpeggios Virus is known for are mostly based on its VA oscillator.
Any idea how much this thing is gonna cost so i can start saving now lol.adamtrance wrote:Yes, Virus C which was perhaps the most iconic synth at the time, it had only the classic oscillators, yet it was the most popular legendary hardware synth. Viper has nearly everything that a Virus C has,but has the Hypersaw too (which came with the Virus Ti), and more features are planned after 1.00, but I had to draw the line somewhere, I could develop it forever without ever releasing it.recursive one wrote:Ok, upon release Viper won't do everything what Virus does but actually about 70% of the unique Virus sound is in its fiters and effects which seem to be properly modelled. These pads, plucks, fat basses and floating arpeggios Virus is known for are mostly based on its VA oscillator.
What ever the price will be it should be half the price since it is only 32-bit ..don't you think? Kidding!Pyrotek45 wrote:Any idea how much this thing is gonna cost so i can start saving now lol.adamtrance wrote:Yes, Virus C which was perhaps the most iconic synth at the time, it had only the classic oscillators, yet it was the most popular legendary hardware synth. Viper has nearly everything that a Virus C has,but has the Hypersaw too (which came with the Virus Ti), and more features are planned after 1.00, but I had to draw the line somewhere, I could develop it forever without ever releasing it.recursive one wrote:Ok, upon release Viper won't do everything what Virus does but actually about 70% of the unique Virus sound is in its fiters and effects which seem to be properly modelled. These pads, plucks, fat basses and floating arpeggios Virus is known for are mostly based on its VA oscillator.
..seriously though, I heard introduction price would be around $99 -ish. If you can nail that granular formant part, I'd be happy to pay many times this amount!
This is the big question, whether the plugin really fills the gap or it's only another VA with the intention to be a Virus emulation. If it sounds 1:1 like a Virus and people say "wow, this sounds exactly like the hardware", there is a good chance people will try it (also with some of the Flowstone limitations we spoke about).recursive one wrote:Ok, upon release Viper won't do everything what Virus does but actually about 70% of the unique Virus sound is in its fiters and effects which seem to be properly modelled. These pads, plucks, fat basses and floating arpeggios Virus is known for are mostly based on its VA oscillator.
| Links 4damind wrote:This is the big question, whether the plugin really fills the gap or it's only another VA with the intention to be a Virus emulation. If it sounds 1:1 like a Virus and people say "wow, this sounds exactly like the hardware", there is a good chance people will try it (also with some of the Flowstone limitations we spoke about).recursive one wrote:Ok, upon release Viper won't do everything what Virus does but actually about 70% of the unique Virus sound is in its fiters and effects which seem to be properly modelled. These pads, plucks, fat basses and floating arpeggios Virus is known for are mostly based on its VA oscillator.
There is also the question if it sounds more like a Virus C or Ti.. which waveforms are included etc.
If it's really a Virus clone (double-blind proved, not by comparing some selected sounds and wave forms via oscilloscope on Youtube) and not a "Sounds-like-a-Virus" clone (we have enough of that already), then that's really a steal.adamtrance wrote:I have done a lof of calculations, comparing features and what it can do compared to other synths, how much work I have put into this, plus it will have free updates and so on, I have decided it will be 89€. Not much to pay for a proper Virusy sound I think
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026
