No. You missed the point again. I give up.fmr wrote:So, if all the synths were the same, they would sound the samechk071 wrote:If they had the same features, they would.fmr wrote:Bullshit. Are you saying that a Prophet-5, a Kawai K5000, a Yamaha FS1R and a Synergy sound 95% the same?chk071 wrote:A bongo is also an acoustic instrument. Yet does it have nothing in common with a piano. Synthesizers to 95% sound the same. And the rest 5% is distinguished and described by, for you, non-telling terms.fmr wrote: But OK, lets make it more interesting - which is warmer, a french horn or a trombone? A flute or a recorder?![]()
I think you're massively missing the point. Again, read the first post, instead of posting offtopic nonsense. That's much better than doing multiple quotes to allegedly prove someone wrong, and still miss the point. Seriously.
![]()
What is all that "warm" "Analog" - "cold" "digital" sound thing about?
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
Does the typical Fairlight voice patch sound warm or cold to people here? I like that sound a lot, but somehow I can't decide whether it sounds warm or cold to me.
Same goes for the DX7 synth basses.
Same goes for the DX7 synth basses.
- KVRAF
- 11162 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
OK, now we are reaching somewhere. But que question the OP asked wasn't simply between what are "warm" and "cold" sounds (which, again is rather subjective, but anyway). What he asked was about the intrinsic qualities "analog" synths have that make people talk about them as "warm" when opposed the "cold digital" synths - and he gave DIVA and Serum as examples of a warm synth as opposed to a cold synth.chk071 wrote: His point was that he wondered what the difference between a "warm" or "cold" sounding SYNTHESIZER is. As there is no point in comparing apples to oranges, of course, he was asking about the differences of synthesizers, when they do the same sounds. Diva can't do wavetables, Serum doesn't have different analog modules. At best, you can do same-ish sounding sounds, and compare those. A wavetable e.g. can sound cold or warm by default, depending on the sonic content. So, if you take a cold sounding wavetable, and compare that to Diva, which sound in Diva would you program to compare it to? On the other hand, a wavetable synthesizer can do simple VA too, so you can of course compare that to another VA synth.
Which is a concept that, frankly, I thought was vanished by now (as I thought was the "best sounding DAW" too, but apparently some myths never die).
So, we can talk about "cold" sounds opposed to "warm" sounds (although I doubt we can reach any consensus about that). But not about analog=warm vs digital=cold.
Fernando (FMR)
- KVRAF
- 11162 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
You mean the famous ? Sounds pretty warm to mefluffy_little_something wrote:Does the typical Fairlight voice patch sound warm or cold to people here? I like that sound a lot, but somehow I can't decide whether it sounds warm or cold to me.
Same goes for the DX7 synth basses.
Fernando (FMR)
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Well, there are surely synths which have a warm, or a cold character. Try to make Z3TA warm sounding, for example, good luck. Unless your definition of warm is another than mine, that is. I wonder why so many don't get what is warm or cold though, and why so many argue that it doesn't matter what the synth is, but it's rather down the sound you program. Seriously, why do we even buy synths then? Merely for their features? No way.fmr wrote:OK, now we are reaching somewhere. But que question the OP asked wasn't simply between what are "warm" and "cold" sounds (which, again is rather subjective, but anyway). What he asked was about the intrinsic qualities "analog" synths have that make people talk about them as "warm" when opposed the "cold digital" synths - and he gave DIVA and Serum as examples of a warm synth as opposed to a cold synth.chk071 wrote: His point was that he wondered what the difference between a "warm" or "cold" sounding SYNTHESIZER is. As there is no point in comparing apples to oranges, of course, he was asking about the differences of synthesizers, when they do the same sounds. Diva can't do wavetables, Serum doesn't have different analog modules. At best, you can do same-ish sounding sounds, and compare those. A wavetable e.g. can sound cold or warm by default, depending on the sonic content. So, if you take a cold sounding wavetable, and compare that to Diva, which sound in Diva would you program to compare it to? On the other hand, a wavetable synthesizer can do simple VA too, so you can of course compare that to another VA synth.
Which is a concept that, frankly, I thought was vanished by now (as I thought was the "best sounding DAW" too, but apparently some myths never die).
So, we can talk about "cold" sounds opposed to "warm" sounds (although I doubt we can reach any consensus about that). But not about analog=warm vs digital=cold.
BTW, no offense, but, the comparison with a DAW is, again, totally wrong too, because a DAW won't by default have saturation in the mixer, unless it's some kind of modelled analog emulation. Many synths on the other hand do have drive in the mixer, or in the filter. Or a bass boost. Or waveforms, which don't have the plain shape of the typical waveform. Apples and oranges.
Last edited by chk071 on Thu Oct 05, 2017 8:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
Yes, that sound. It sounds both cold and warm to mefmr wrote:You mean the famous ? Sounds pretty warm to mefluffy_little_something wrote:Does the typical Fairlight voice patch sound warm or cold to people here? I like that sound a lot, but somehow I can't decide whether it sounds warm or cold to me.
Same goes for the DX7 synth basses.
- KVRAF
- 12615 posts since 7 Dec, 2004
xhip.net wrote:Finished processing 13:37:01

Free plug-ins for Windows, MacOS and Linux. Xhip Synthesizer v8.0 and Xhip Effects Bundle v6.7.
The coder's credo: We believe our work is neither clever nor difficult; it is done because we thought it would be easy.
Work less; get more done.
The coder's credo: We believe our work is neither clever nor difficult; it is done because we thought it would be easy.
Work less; get more done.
- KVRAF
- 26033 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
Another instance of something I see here frequently. Someone has a possibly 'typical' limited experience, oriented in synthesizers and here's a worldview, a disposition stated as the fact, and now it's the whole of what there is and that's the end of it for them.fmr wrote:yet, it's not "your view" that defines things.fluffy_little_something wrote:In my view sample-based synthesis (which might also include wavetable I suppose) is not what a mere rompler/sampler does.ANYTHING can be used for creating new sounds. You can create new sounds with acoustic instruments - just use them in unusual ways, and you create new sounds with them. And the fact that there are people "who do entire classical works using romplers" doesn't invalidate anything. Do you have any idea of how much work is necessary to "fake" an orchestra, with what you call "a rompler"?fluffy_little_something wrote: The former is for creating new sounds, whereas the latter is for reproducing real instruments as authentically as possible. There are people who do entire classical works using romplers. For a layman it is hard to notice that it was not a live orchestra but a sound module playing.
Anyway, a sampler can be used to create "new sounds" MUCH MORE than a "mere" subtractive synth, which sound palette is WAY more limited.
Something I really enjoy doing with particular Kontakt Instruments (it's so unnecessarily dismissive to say 'rompler' and I'm not sure it's accurate for too many things now), for instance by SonicCouture (or Soundiron) is the sound design aspect. They exploit the filters in K5 and have scripted envelope control of the sound itself and for the filter, 'FEG'. So there are many possibilities as to sound control. Not to mention the effects, auto-wah, phaser, chorus, distortion & cabinet-type saturation. Then, say with Soundiron there's all this convolution of weird spaces, synthetic spaces even to draw from.
I saw someone with an upright bass get some things with col legno bow on the other side of the bridge I had not heard, for an instance of new sounds with acoustic instruments. Then we may get into brass half-valving, multiphonics on wind instruments... there is a guy, Urs something who's very into birds on his soprano sax...
that doesn't get into the manipulations under the hood of normal use for orchestration...
- KVRAF
- 8071 posts since 9 Jan, 2003 from Saint Louis MO
The squeaking chair sounds coldfmr wrote:You mean the famous ARR1?
The synth sounds like one of those many, many synth sounds which I would not use either the word "warm" or "cold" to describe. Ignoring the fact that it's a famous sound, we know exactly what synth it is, and can see it in the video -- analog synths simply don't make those sorts of sounds. Except maybe for good old' analog rompler Mellotron
One of the reasons I roll my eyes at "digital can never be as good as analog" arguments.
-
- Boss Lovin' DR
- 14312 posts since 15 Mar, 2002 from the grimness of yorkshire
-
- KVRAF
- 16724 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
Yes, record friction should be taken seriously. This is why modern record players don't have 78RPM speeds any longer. After analog synths became more popular, the higher speeds could actually be dangerous. IIRC several house fires resulted from people playing Gershon Kingsley records on 78 RPM in the early 70s. Shortly after, many countries banned the manufacturer and sale of new record players with a 78RPM speeds.Vortifex wrote:Sonic temperature is a very real phenomenon. IIRC studies showed that music produced with analog synths and/or their software counterparts is around 15-20% warmer. This is why the early vinyl albums from artists such as Tangerine Dream and Jean-Michel Jarre tended to degrade faster, as the extra heat rendered the vinyl more malleable and thus erosion from needle friction became a problem.
This is also the origin of the contemporary slang of referring to club bangers as "fire." DJs could literally feel the heat coming off of the warmest and fattest records being played on fresh vinyl in the club. Most people don't handle their records quite as much as DJs and so they may be less sensitive to these effects when records are played on normal speed.
- KVRAF
- 12615 posts since 7 Dec, 2004
Free plug-ins for Windows, MacOS and Linux. Xhip Synthesizer v8.0 and Xhip Effects Bundle v6.7.
The coder's credo: We believe our work is neither clever nor difficult; it is done because we thought it would be easy.
Work less; get more done.
The coder's credo: We believe our work is neither clever nor difficult; it is done because we thought it would be easy.
Work less; get more done.
- Banned
- 10729 posts since 17 Nov, 2015
Does it matter?fluffy_little_something wrote:Does the typical Fairlight voice patch sound warm or cold to people here? I like that sound a lot, but somehow I can't decide whether it sounds warm or cold to me.
Same goes for the DX7 synth basses.
The question should be, "does this sound fit into my song?"
Its really that simple.
Adjectives dont make a noise.
- Banned
- 10729 posts since 17 Nov, 2015
ghettosynth wrote:Yes, record friction should be taken seriously. This is why modern record players don't have 78RPM speeds any longer. After analog synths became more popular, the higher speeds could actually be dangerous. IIRC several house fires resulted from people playing Gershon Kingsley records on 78 RPM in the early 70s. Shortly after, many countries banned the manufacturer and sale of new record players with a 78RPM speeds.Vortifex wrote:Sonic temperature is a very real phenomenon. IIRC studies showed that music produced with analog synths and/or their software counterparts is around 15-20% warmer. This is why the early vinyl albums from artists such as Tangerine Dream and Jean-Michel Jarre tended to degrade faster, as the extra heat rendered the vinyl more malleable and thus erosion from needle friction became a problem.
But...
Not true. The Audio Technica LP120 has 33/45/78.
-
- KVRAF
- 16724 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
Yes, with vinyl falling out of favor, some manufacturers were willing to skirt the law to keep sales up. This has largely been forgotten about, but it's not something to toy with. With the vinyl and analog renaissance happening at the same time, high speed turntables could spell disaster.AnX wrote:ghettosynth wrote:Yes, record friction should be taken seriously. This is why modern record players don't have 78RPM speeds any longer. After analog synths became more popular, the higher speeds could actually be dangerous. IIRC several house fires resulted from people playing Gershon Kingsley records on 78 RPM in the early 70s. Shortly after, many countries banned the manufacturer and sale of new record players with a 78RPM speeds.Vortifex wrote:Sonic temperature is a very real phenomenon. IIRC studies showed that music produced with analog synths and/or their software counterparts is around 15-20% warmer. This is why the early vinyl albums from artists such as Tangerine Dream and Jean-Michel Jarre tended to degrade faster, as the extra heat rendered the vinyl more malleable and thus erosion from needle friction became a problem.
![]()
But...
Not true. The Audio Technica LP120 has 33/45/78.