Keep in mind that my example was for 3 of them. Saying that, it's possible that there is some part of the hit that is not related to CPU frequency that got better. Then faster CPUs would get more improvement - they would have had more overhead before, and less now - would need to see more systems to know for sure.kmonkey wrote: Thanks for posting. Your result vary a lot to my system but i guess it's due different CPUs. (i am on win10 i7 haswell - 4ghz). On my system when i was testing back then:
Live 9 Magnetic - 7%
Live 9 Modnetic - 2% - greatly improved CPU when compared to M4l version which is why i am asking these questions.
Can you just tell me how long does it take for you to load Magnetic on Live 10 (not Live 9) when you run Live 10 for the first time after booting to your operating system. Please and thank you. Asking because i was VERY annoyed by M4L plugin loading times. Example Magnetic is loading for around 8-10 seconds for the first time after booting and running Live while Modnetic (vst version) was loading in 1 second.
I don't remember an exact time (and I'd have to reboot to find that exact sequence out, not ready to do that at the moment
