Then i'm sorry you'll have to use a shareware or freeware program in the future.aldi wrote:if that is professional, than i don't like professionals.
Hm, what new sign?i agree to koolkeys. it's not whining it's just waiting for a sign.
That T2 will have better MIDI-capabilities? You know already.
That a special version of T2 run on an exhibition with a Mackie-Control? You know already.
Hehe, yes i agree. But you surely heard, that Mackie is distributor.everybody knows that emagic, steinberg, ableton are big companies and they surely go on developing their products. jules is just ONE person. if he thinks "oh, at the moment I'm bored working on tracktion" the whole project stops till he changes his mind. i know he's a genius but genius often get bored in doing the same thing all the time
Think realistically: do you really believe, Mackie gives his good name away, without making sure, the developer will have hold certain time-limits?
Mackie has way more to lose than Jules.
That could be easily possible. Maybe just because he was working on T2?an that i come to this thinking is because t1 lacks some minor and fast to do things that where often talked about but where never been made. it all began with jules saying more often "sorry folks, I'm very busy with things" but when he was soo busy where are the improvements and bugfixes. seems like t1 wasn't the priority a long time.
What you call minor things, need nevertheless be thought out well, programmed and tested.
And as you stated, Jules is a one man show.
That means, he has to do everything on his own. Even the graphics i guess.
And a word to those 'minor changes': look at the other sequencers, how long things sometimes need.
How long it took for Logic users to get non-realtime bounce.
Cubase users still have no good freeze-function.
...
I understand the thrill and joy of everyone when thinking about T2, but what would such an information change? Fans/users are never satisfied with informations.i only wan't to know, if it is at the moment. that's just one sentence !!! ("yes, I'm working a lot on T2" or "I'm fixing things in T1 at the moment")
If you give them the small finger, they want the whole hand.
If T1 is fine for you, use it.
If T1 is not good for you. Don't use it. It's that simple.
And what if Jules can't name a date? You said yourself, he is alone. Have you ever programmed something? It's extremely difficult to hold timelines even for small programs. And then such a beast!
What would happen, if Jules states, he is working on T2?
Very soon everyone would moan, when the hell will T2 finally be ready, becasue Live4, Sonar and all the other sequencers are out, too?
What a stupid argument: to release the own program, when all others do, too. Does that make the program a bit better?
Or does it maybe even give the opportunity to observe the competition?
Yes, and there are olso other companies, presenting things when they are ready instead of promising and promising just to keep the people smiling.if you cantact steinberg or emagic support and tell them a problem, they say SOMETHING to it or if it will be fixed or when this feature could be available. surely they don't write it down on their website to early, but you can ask them and if they knew they say something like "i'm not sur, but it should be available in one of the nearer updates" i know it, because i've had logic.
I can understand Jules and becasue i'm not that MIDI freak, but a sound- and audio-freak, i can do already everything with T1 way better than with any other sequencer.
Even if Jules posted here and said on this thread...
