Tyrell N6 question
-
- KVRer
- 2 posts since 25 Dec, 2017
I was wondering if this is the correct place to post questions. If so I'm curious about what time units the ENV sliders use for attack, decay, and release. I would like know how to specify milliseconds.
Thanks.
Thanks.
-
- KVRAF
- 35687 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
No time units, just the u-he typical values. If you want to know exactly, you could measure the envelope stages with an oscilloscope, e.g. What do you need the precise values in milliseconds for though?
-
dlarseninclusive dlarseninclusive https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=408358
- KVRist
- 295 posts since 19 Nov, 2017 from Los Angeles
AFK on my phone atm. I have been patching Tyrell for the last two days and tried a few things, it looks like a fun experiment, and I would like to understand this better.
I tried patching the sliders to the amp control of an external LFO, the 1% increments are the same as the sliders. So that is static
The envelop of a physical harmonic oscillator is based on mass, distance and resistance. (Gravity, viscosity, ohms etc...) resulting in amplitude and frequency that decays over time t; (delta Af/t = envelope) I think.. those are the parameters that are available to adjust.
I found an oscilloscope that can do the measureing. The last part is understanding the math better.
I think a function like F(t, x, y)=ft(x, y) solved for √t calculated for ASD and R should provide the baseline tangent needed to compare the measurements to.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Envelope_(mathematics)
Anyway I am processing that. I will get back.
If anyone knows that physics, insights would be appreciated.
I tried patching the sliders to the amp control of an external LFO, the 1% increments are the same as the sliders. So that is static
The envelop of a physical harmonic oscillator is based on mass, distance and resistance. (Gravity, viscosity, ohms etc...) resulting in amplitude and frequency that decays over time t; (delta Af/t = envelope) I think.. those are the parameters that are available to adjust.
I found an oscilloscope that can do the measureing. The last part is understanding the math better.
I think a function like F(t, x, y)=ft(x, y) solved for √t calculated for ASD and R should provide the baseline tangent needed to compare the measurements to.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Envelope_(mathematics)
Anyway I am processing that. I will get back.
If anyone knows that physics, insights would be appreciated.
-
dlarseninclusive dlarseninclusive https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=408358
- KVRist
- 295 posts since 19 Nov, 2017 from Los Angeles
A guess to try, is modulating the ossicolator amp with a ramp LFO tuned to .01. That should give you the average time for all 4 stages in the envelop, I'm not sure how to tie that to the gate signal to queue release. I can look when I get back to my desk.
Just thinking out loud
Just thinking out loud
- KVRAF
- 3229 posts since 10 Nov, 2013 from Germany
Some measurements:
Sustain level seems to be linear, so 50 is -6 dB, 10 is -20 dB.
Code: Select all
Attack (logarithmic shape):
0 0.001 (minimum attack time)
5 0.001
10 0.009
15 0.029
20 0.070
25 0.137
30 0.236
35 0.375
40 0.560
45 0.798
50 1.094
55 1.454
60 1.888
65 2.400
70 2.994
75 3.688
80 4.475
85 5.369
90 6.380
95 7.484
100 8.743
Decay and Release (to -60 dB) exponential shape:
0 0.001
5 0.002
10 0.018
15 0.060
20 0.139
25 0.272
30 0.469
35 0.756
40 1.109
45 1.578
50 2.180
55 2.959
60 3.742
65 4.785
70 6.133
75 7.436
80 8.866
90 13.162
100 18.063
-
dlarseninclusive dlarseninclusive https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=408358
- KVRist
- 295 posts since 19 Nov, 2017 from Los Angeles
Nice work. The measurements I am getting are spot on in some areas and vastly different in others on your list. Also I am having a hard time with the longer measurements. I will try different scope plugins and try again.Chris-S wrote:Some measurements:
Again, my goal is to understand envelopes better. Not to step on this thread.
- KVRAF
- 3229 posts since 10 Nov, 2013 from Germany
Which value is different? For the decay (to zero) it depends on the end-level (I've choosen -60 dB).
Did'nt check if the decay times are depending on the sustain level.
Did'nt check if the decay times are depending on the sustain level.
-
dlarseninclusive dlarseninclusive https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=408358
- KVRist
- 295 posts since 19 Nov, 2017 from Los Angeles
I few spots over 25 in attack, and I think decay was about the same. The shorter ones were identical. My first try as using my beatstep, but the gate signal was too short to get past about 30. I am trying again wit the DAW sequencer and a longer note. I am pretty sure the problem is my own technique.Chris-S wrote:Which value is different? For the decay (to zero) it depends on the end-level (I've choosen -60 dB).
Did'nt check if the decay times are depending on the sustain level.
- KVRAF
- 3229 posts since 10 Nov, 2013 from Germany
Checked it. Seems not to be depending on sustain level, so the envelope is time-based (not rate-based) like in the majority of all synths.Chris-S wrote:Did'nt check if the decay times are depending on the sustain level.
-
dlarseninclusive dlarseninclusive https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=408358
- KVRist
- 295 posts since 19 Nov, 2017 from Los Angeles
Reason was giving me some headaches with the oscilloscope, I just picked up Waveform last night and I am very impressed. All of my VST problems are gone, rewire worked on the first try, and I can now load even more Repro-5 units in a project.
Point being the oscilloscopes work, I will circle back on this when I get a minute. This is interesting, and I want to follow it though.
Point being the oscilloscopes work, I will circle back on this when I get a minute. This is interesting, and I want to follow it though.
