http://artmusictech.libsyn.com/podcast- ... el-hetrick
great podcast.. so many great interviews/conversations.
That's Viz by Echobit - looks like it's a separate project by Joshua Dickinson who also works at Unfiltered. I bought it and it's lots of fun!VariKusBrainZ wrote:Wasnt there a recent Mac only vst visual plugin?
I bought a licence for when its ported to Windows but cant rememeber what it was called!
Doesnt appear to be on this page
http://mhetrick.com/projects
Awesome, not sure I need it, but I definitely want itWinstontaneous wrote: That's Viz by Echobit - looks like it's a separate project by Joshua Dickinson who also works at Unfiltered. I bought it and it's lots of fun!
Thanks for the reminderWinstontaneous wrote:That's Viz by Echobit - looks like it's a separate project by Joshua Dickinson who also works at Unfiltered. I bought it and it's lots of fun!VariKusBrainZ wrote:Wasnt there a recent Mac only vst visual plugin?
I bought a licence for when its ported to Windows but cant rememeber what it was called!
Doesnt appear to be on this page
http://mhetrick.com/projects
Thanks, will happily listen. I'm very curious what a UA instrument can be. Hoping for good workflow, innovation, modulation goodness und up to date visualisation of what is happening/e. g. state of LFOs. Serum/Avenger raised the bar here.
It's a great listen. Thanks.tapiodmitriyevich wrote:Thanks, will happily listen. I'm very curious what a UA instrument can be. Hoping for good workflow, innovation, modulation goodness und up to date visualisation of what is happening/e. g. state of LFOs. Serum/Avenger raised the bar here.
per-note-modulation-settingslnikj wrote:It's a great listen. Thanks.tapiodmitriyevich wrote:Thanks, will happily listen. I'm very curious what a UA instrument can be. Hoping for good workflow, innovation, modulation goodness und up to date visualisation of what is happening/e. g. state of LFOs. Serum/Avenger raised the bar here.
Regarding modulation goodness - yes, there is something very tasty indeed, right at the end of the podcast.
dayjob wrote:per-note-modulation-settingslnikj wrote:It's a great listen. Thanks.tapiodmitriyevich wrote:Thanks, will happily listen. I'm very curious what a UA instrument can be. Hoping for good workflow, innovation, modulation goodness und up to date visualisation of what is happening/e. g. state of LFOs. Serum/Avenger raised the bar here.
Regarding modulation goodness - yes, there is something very tasty indeed, right at the end of the podcast.![]()
Yes, that was a great interview. I particularly liked his comment about the Octatrack, which is exactly how I feel about it- a totally bizarre product design, with no specific way it was intended to be used.dayjob wrote:anyone catch darwin grosse's awesome podcast conversation with Michael Hetrick ? great stuff. enjoyed listening to this at work today. he talks a bit about the synth coming next year from UA
http://artmusictech.libsyn.com/podcast- ... el-hetrick
great podcast.. so many great interviews/conversations.
I was going to get Sandman Pro and SpecOps but I wanted to demo SpecOps first. I already have Fault and Dent 2 but I'm seriously thinking about putting them on the marketplace now. I don't want anything from this company on my computer anymore. I'm really sad/angry that UA decided to go with them.I'm starting to hate this company. Can't even test a plugin because supposedly I already tested in the the past... That 14 days demo is nice but after the 14 days it should still be possible to demo something with maybe more limitations (sound drop off/noise). They've just lost me as a client (and unfortunately Unfiltered Audio too).
Sorry, but your behavior is completely unacceptable! If you are not able to judge a plugin within 14 days then it‘s solely your problem. But instead of working on your testing discipline you start a hate post. OMG, what a cheap and mean move...xx JPRacer xx wrote:Something I posted about Plugin Alliance that I think I should post here too:I was going to get Sandman Pro and SpecOps but I wanted to demo SpecOps first. I already have Fault and Dent 2 but I'm seriously thinking about putting them on the marketplace now. I don't want anything from this company on my computer anymore. I'm really sad/angry that UA decided to go with them.I'm starting to hate this company. Can't even test a plugin because supposedly I already tested in the the past... That 14 days demo is nice but after the 14 days it should still be possible to demo something with maybe more limitations (sound drop off/noise). They've just lost me as a client (and unfortunately Unfiltered Audio too).
EDIT: Ok, I've contacted them, we'll see... Still a waste of time and still hate the whole process!
Who said I tested for 14 days? That's the problem with the whole process. I tested for top 15-30 minutes and then had other obligations. Some people do other things in life that is much more important than reserving full 14 days to test an audio plugin especially if music is just a hobby for them. The 14 days should be actual plugin use.martinjuenke wrote:Sorry, but your behavior is completely unacceptable! If you are not able to judge a plugin within 14 days then it‘s solely your problem. But instead of working on your testing discipline you start a hate post. OMG, what a cheap and mean move...xx JPRacer xx wrote:Something I posted about Plugin Alliance that I think I should post here too:I was going to get Sandman Pro and SpecOps but I wanted to demo SpecOps first. I already have Fault and Dent 2 but I'm seriously thinking about putting them on the marketplace now. I don't want anything from this company on my computer anymore. I'm really sad/angry that UA decided to go with them.I'm starting to hate this company. Can't even test a plugin because supposedly I already tested in the the past... That 14 days demo is nice but after the 14 days it should still be possible to demo something with maybe more limitations (sound drop off/noise). They've just lost me as a client (and unfortunately Unfiltered Audio too).
EDIT: Ok, I've contacted them, we'll see... Still a waste of time and still hate the whole process!
Good points. I can relate.xx JPRacer xx wrote:Who said I tested for 14 days? That's the problem with the whole process. I tested for top 15-30 minutes and then had other obligations. Some people do other things in life that is much more important than reserving full 14 days to test an audio plugin especially if music is just a hobby for them. The 14 days should be actual plugin use.martinjuenke wrote:Sorry, but your behavior is completely unacceptable! If you are not able to judge a plugin within 14 days then it‘s solely your problem. But instead of working on your testing discipline you start a hate post. OMG, what a cheap and mean move...xx JPRacer xx wrote:Something I posted about Plugin Alliance that I think I should post here too:I was going to get Sandman Pro and SpecOps but I wanted to demo SpecOps first. I already have Fault and Dent 2 but I'm seriously thinking about putting them on the marketplace now. I don't want anything from this company on my computer anymore. I'm really sad/angry that UA decided to go with them.I'm starting to hate this company. Can't even test a plugin because supposedly I already tested in the the past... That 14 days demo is nice but after the 14 days it should still be possible to demo something with maybe more limitations (sound drop off/noise). They've just lost me as a client (and unfortunately Unfiltered Audio too).
EDIT: Ok, I've contacted them, we'll see... Still a waste of time and still hate the whole process!
And with other companies I have all the time I need to test their software and don't need to contact support.
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026