ANA 2 or Serum
-
- KVRAF
- 5664 posts since 7 Feb, 2013
Serum + Sylenth as rent-to-own sounds like a plan. I believe these two synths are what many trance producers actually use and it is a very good combo because these two synths are among the best in their respective niches and have very little overlap between each other.
Serum indeed loads samples only in its noise osc (if we talk about sample playback, not resynthesis/wt creation). It doesn't offer much sampler functionality - i think no more than FL Studio native sampler - though you can admix the sample to Serum's own oscillators and process it with Serum's filters and FX.
It is not quite clear what samples you want to use (oneshots? multisamples?) and what you want to do with them (are they supposed to emulate real instruments, or you want some kind of creative sample mangling/slicing/granulizing etc, or what?). Anyway, I wouldn't choose a subtractive/wavetable synth basing on its sampler capabilities, for this I'd go either for a dedicated sampler like Kontakt or a specialized sample-based synth like Absynth/Mangle/Form etc depending on what you want to do with the samples.
Serum indeed loads samples only in its noise osc (if we talk about sample playback, not resynthesis/wt creation). It doesn't offer much sampler functionality - i think no more than FL Studio native sampler - though you can admix the sample to Serum's own oscillators and process it with Serum's filters and FX.
It is not quite clear what samples you want to use (oneshots? multisamples?) and what you want to do with them (are they supposed to emulate real instruments, or you want some kind of creative sample mangling/slicing/granulizing etc, or what?). Anyway, I wouldn't choose a subtractive/wavetable synth basing on its sampler capabilities, for this I'd go either for a dedicated sampler like Kontakt or a specialized sample-based synth like Absynth/Mangle/Form etc depending on what you want to do with the samples.
You may think you can fly ... but you better not try
-
- KVRAF
- 5664 posts since 7 Feb, 2013
Another good suggestion. There are free Virus TI wavetables in Serum format floating on the web, you may load them into Rapid, add Viper for VA, hypersaw and FM sounds and pretend that you have an actual Virus TI which was a default synth for most trance producers during the second half of 00's when most of the classic trance tunes were made. Obviously Serum also loads these WTs but the basic sound of Rapid, its filters and effects are actually much closer to Virus.kokotte wrote:i vote for Viper and Rapid
TBH when I had demoed Ana2 i was dissapointed, IMO it sounds thin and very digital, not the kind of sound I want to hear in my tracks.
You may think you can fly ... but you better not try
-
- KVRer
- 19 posts since 18 Jan, 2017
have you saw this video from Sonic Academy on sound design for the ANA2 about it's supersaw?recursive one wrote:Another good suggestion. There are free Virus TI wavetables in Serum format floating on the web, you may load them into Rapid, add Viper for VA, hypersaw and FM sounds and pretend that you have an actual Virus TI which was a default synth for most trance producers during the second half of 00's when most of the classic trance tunes were made. Obviously Serum also loads these WTs but the basic sound of Rapid, its filters and effects are actually much closer to Virus.kokotte wrote:i vote for Viper and Rapid
TBH when I had demoed Ana2 i was dissapointed, IMO it sounds thin and very digital, not the kind of sound I want to hear in my tracks.
what do you think Viper vs ANA2 unison supersaw?
- KVRAF
- 7691 posts since 11 Jun, 2006
sounds pretty thin to me, not even adding chorus and reverbhamayame wrote:have you saw this video from Sonic Academy on sound design for the ANA2 about it's supersaw?
could ever fatten that up. nope.....
HW SYNTHS [KORG T2EX - AKAI AX80 - YAMAHA SY77 - ENSONIQ VFX]
HW MODULES [OBi M1000 - ROLAND MKS-50 - ROLAND JV880 - KURZ 1000PX]
SW [CHARLATAN - OBXD - OXE - ELEKTRO - MICROTERA - M1 - SURGE - RMiV]
DAW [ENERGY XT2/1U RACK WINXP / MAUDIO 1010LT PCI]
HW MODULES [OBi M1000 - ROLAND MKS-50 - ROLAND JV880 - KURZ 1000PX]
SW [CHARLATAN - OBXD - OXE - ELEKTRO - MICROTERA - M1 - SURGE - RMiV]
DAW [ENERGY XT2/1U RACK WINXP / MAUDIO 1010LT PCI]
-
- KVRAF
- 35672 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
I know i sound boring when i always repeat the same thing, but, since Spire, none of those "flagship unison synths" has wow'd me anymore. Dunno, they all sound inferior to it to me. IMO, Spire has really set the bar higher for that type of synth. A synth which would sweep me off my feet would have to sound at least as good as Spire, and have some analog modelled ZDf filters, with moderate CPU usage, of course, so it doesn't slaughter the CPU like more detailled analog emus. My hope is still that Reveal-Sound one day release Spire 2, with new designed filters. I'm sure they can do it.recursive one wrote: TBH when I had demoed Ana2 i was dissapointed, IMO it sounds thin and very digital, not the kind of sound I want to hear in my tracks.
Anyway, blub blub bla, my recommendation to the OP would be to demo Spire, and see if it is to his liking. For me, surely the best choice for most sounds in Trance music.
- KVRAF
- 7872 posts since 21 Dec, 2002 from MD USA
another vote for Rapid
my music: http://www.alexcooperusa.com
"It's hard to be humble, when you're as great as I am." Muhammad Ali
"It's hard to be humble, when you're as great as I am." Muhammad Ali
-
- Banned
- 1779 posts since 26 Aug, 2012
To me this isn't apples and oranges, it's green apples vs red ones. Seriously, there's next to no different between any of the synths mentioned except controls, workflow and GUIs. Anyone who thinks spire and others sound COMPLETELY different from the next is talking out of their ass. Spire, serum can do trance but so can everything else like synthmaster, just as good. There is no trace vst!
In time you'll come to realize that. trance, techo, house, and the others which sit in the middle can be done using most of the vsts on the market. If I were you id be more concerned about what effects I should be looking at and mixing techniques to make these synths shine cause quite frankly most of them sound like shit out of the box.
In time you'll come to realize that. trance, techo, house, and the others which sit in the middle can be done using most of the vsts on the market. If I were you id be more concerned about what effects I should be looking at and mixing techniques to make these synths shine cause quite frankly most of them sound like shit out of the box.
- KVRAF
- 7872 posts since 21 Dec, 2002 from MD USA
[quote="Kinh"]To me this isn't apples and oranges, it's green apples vs red ones. Seriously, there's next to no different between any of the synths mentioned except controls, workflow and GUIs. Anyone who thinks spire and others sound COMPLETELY different from the next is talking out of their ass. Spire, serum can do trance but so can everything else like synthmaster, just as good. There is no trace vst!
In time you'll come to realize that. trance, techo, house, and the others which sit in the middle can be done using most of the vsts on the market. If I were you id be more concerned about what effects I should be looking at and mixing techniques to make these synths shine cause quite frankly most of them sound like shit out of the box.[/quote]
I'd say you are the one talking out of their ass
In time you'll come to realize that. trance, techo, house, and the others which sit in the middle can be done using most of the vsts on the market. If I were you id be more concerned about what effects I should be looking at and mixing techniques to make these synths shine cause quite frankly most of them sound like shit out of the box.[/quote]
I'd say you are the one talking out of their ass
my music: http://www.alexcooperusa.com
"It's hard to be humble, when you're as great as I am." Muhammad Ali
"It's hard to be humble, when you're as great as I am." Muhammad Ali
-
- KVRAF
- 5664 posts since 7 Feb, 2013
I've just checked this guy's soundcloud out of curiosity. Actually he seems to be quite competent in making this "future-something" kind of music which is currently popular. I guess that's their actual approach - take any random synth and process the sh!t of it until it sounds right.ATS wrote:Kinh wrote:To me this isn't apples and oranges, it's green apples vs red ones. Seriously, there's next to no different between any of the synths mentioned except controls, workflow and GUIs. Anyone who thinks spire and others sound COMPLETELY different from the next is talking out of their ass. Spire, serum can do trance but so can everything else like synthmaster, just as good. There is no trace vst!![]()
In time you'll come to realize that. trance, techo, house, and the others which sit in the middle can be done using most of the vsts on the market. If I were you id be more concerned about what effects I should be looking at and mixing techniques to make these synths shine cause quite frankly most of them sound like shit out of the box.[/quote]
I'd say you are the one talking out of their ass
You may think you can fly ... but you better not try
-
- KVRer
- 19 posts since 18 Jan, 2017
I still learning producing Trance.. IMO, some genre do need special attention on the how the sound produced even before it gone through filter and other processing.. I can say this because my mentor teach me using one synth which I have atm.. it sounded out of what Trance would sound like, even compared on what he produce..Kinh wrote:To me this isn't apples and oranges, it's green apples vs red ones. Seriously, there's next to no different between any of the synths mentioned except controls, workflow and GUIs. Anyone who thinks spire and others sound COMPLETELY different from the next is talking out of their ass. Spire, serum can do trance but so can everything else like synthmaster, just as good. There is no trace vst!![]()
In time you'll come to realize that. trance, techo, house, and the others which sit in the middle can be done using most of the vsts on the market. If I were you id be more concerned about what effects I should be looking at and mixing techniques to make these synths shine cause quite frankly most of them sound like shit out of the box.
That's why I started to search a soft synth which produce quite close unison emulation to Virus Ti and got stuck with picking ANA2, Serum, Viper, and Lush-101
-
- KVRAF
- 35672 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
I don't know why you people always have to exaggerate so much. Noone said that synths sound COMPLETELY different. They're all synth, and they all have sawtooth waves. Yet, it is obvious that their subtle difference can sometimes make a big difference, or just make things easy for the user. Horses for courses.Kinh wrote:To me this isn't apples and oranges, it's green apples vs red ones. Seriously, there's next to no different between any of the synths mentioned except controls, workflow and GUIs. Anyone who thinks spire and others sound COMPLETELY different from the next is talking out of their ass. Spire, serum can do trance but so can everything else like synthmaster, just as good. There is no trace vst!![]()
-
Distorted Horizon Distorted Horizon https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=392076
- Banned
- 3878 posts since 17 Jan, 2017 from Planet of cats
Is this a right point to turn the conversation about.. Hardware synth for trance?
And how it's better compared to software
And how it's better compared to software
-
- KVRAF
- 35672 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Considering that most producers will work in the box by now, and, if then, the Virus would be the obvious synth to name, i don't think there'd be much point in that.
Really, AFAIC, according to what i always saw when watching those "lovely" producer videos, they all used Sylenth and Massive, and now, many also use Spire and Serum. Boring, i know, but, that's how it is, for the most part.
This site gives quite a good impression as well: http://equipboard.com/
This site gives quite a good impression as well: http://equipboard.com/
- KVRAF
- 22963 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
A competent producer with the right FX and a thorough knowledge of mixing can make just about any synth sound good, whereas somebody like myself can make just about any synth sound like crap.
That's not to say all synths sound the same because they don't. Out of the box, there are differences that even my ears can hear. Some synths, like Thorn, have a very dirty kind of sound. Other synths, like Tone 2 stuff, have what I call that plastic sound. Some synths sound thin and dull while others sound thicker. Synths that use samples obviously don't sound like synths that use regular oscillators. I mean I don't care how great any Trance synth may be, it's not going to sound like Omnisphere's sample library. A DX7 isn't going to sound like Softube modular no matter what you do to it.
I think we get so caught up in what gear we use that we forget about the only thing that really matters...making music.
Here's a trance track I did for Recursive that he said "wasn't bad for a first effort." I bet nobody here can tell what synths I used. Hell, even I don't remember.
https://soundcloud.com/steven-wagenheim ... eim/sets/m
That's not to say all synths sound the same because they don't. Out of the box, there are differences that even my ears can hear. Some synths, like Thorn, have a very dirty kind of sound. Other synths, like Tone 2 stuff, have what I call that plastic sound. Some synths sound thin and dull while others sound thicker. Synths that use samples obviously don't sound like synths that use regular oscillators. I mean I don't care how great any Trance synth may be, it's not going to sound like Omnisphere's sample library. A DX7 isn't going to sound like Softube modular no matter what you do to it.
I think we get so caught up in what gear we use that we forget about the only thing that really matters...making music.
Here's a trance track I did for Recursive that he said "wasn't bad for a first effort." I bet nobody here can tell what synths I used. Hell, even I don't remember.
https://soundcloud.com/steven-wagenheim ... eim/sets/m
