Bye bye VST2
- KVRian
- 1091 posts since 8 Feb, 2012 from South - Africa
Come to think of it, this also raises some competition policy(anti-trust for ya Americans) issues. As new developers will not have access to VST2 but existing devs will, that would create a competitive disadvantage to new entrants as VST2 demand is still high. Thereby subduing competitive market driven pricing.
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
As every host supports VST3 these days anyway, i don't see the issue. How would it be a competitive disadvantage? For the end user, it doesn't matter whether it is VST2 or 3, when it works.Ichad.c wrote:Come to think of it, this also raises some competition policy(anti-trust for ya Americans) issues. As new developers will not have access to VST2 but existing devs will, that would create a competitive disadvantage to new entrants as VST2 demand is still high. Thereby subduing competitive market driven pricing.
- KVRAF
- 24403 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
Can't new devs get SDK from existing devs?
MuLAB
Digital Performer
Live
Maschine
Reason (might as well mention it, since they added VST to it)
Renoise
Audacity
probably some others too
Ahem...chk071 wrote:As every host supports VST3 these days anyway, i don't see the issue.
MuLAB
Digital Performer
Live
Maschine
Reason (might as well mention it, since they added VST to it)
Renoise
Audacity
probably some others too
- KVRAF
- 12615 posts since 7 Dec, 2004
Been there ... done that ...Oopi wrote:VST3 is like that Windows version nobody liked. I mean it has been around like ten years and people still complain so there has to be something terribly wrong with that. It's just not hip or cool or rad like VST2 is. Steinberg should just terminate VST3 right now and release VST4 which would really be VST2 in new disguise.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winamp#Winamp_5
2 + 3 = 5
"Nobody wants to see a Winamp 4 skin."
Free plug-ins for Windows, MacOS and Linux. Xhip Synthesizer v8.0 and Xhip Effects Bundle v6.7.
The coder's credo: We believe our work is neither clever nor difficult; it is done because we thought it would be easy.
Work less; get more done.
The coder's credo: We believe our work is neither clever nor difficult; it is done because we thought it would be easy.
Work less; get more done.
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Ok, let's say the important hosts support it then.EvilDragon wrote:Ahem...chk071 wrote:As every host supports VST3 these days anyway, i don't see the issue.
MuLAB
Digital Performer
Live
Maschine
Reason (might as well mention it, since they added VST to it)
Renoise
Audacity
probably some others too
-
Robert Randolph Robert Randolph https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=7328
- KVRAF
- 2226 posts since 25 May, 2003 from Saint Petersburg, Florida
Digital Performer is important!chk071 wrote:Ok, let's say the important hosts support it then.EvilDragon wrote:Ahem...chk071 wrote:As every host supports VST3 these days anyway, i don't see the issue.
MuLAB
Digital Performer
Live
Maschine
Reason (might as well mention it, since they added VST to it)
Renoise
Audacity
probably some others too(Maybe except Live and Maschine on your list. Reason needs to play catch up for a while now anyway)
- KVRist
- 285 posts since 22 Feb, 2017
Cantabile too. Seems like a lot of devs have stories like this.. https://blog.cantabilesoftware.com/ques ... ac1ccfc135
- KVRAF
- 37377 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
Most hosts don't support it particularly well - several seem content with just loading them but to all intents and purposes apart from side chain they are functionally no better than VST2 due to lack of support for the more unique VST3 features, in fact many don't even load vstpresets properly if at all. Studio One comes closest but even then doesn't support VST3 features such as per note expression (not sure how many support sample accurate automation either, or audio input for instruments, or multiple IOs etc).chk071 wrote:As every host supports VST3 these days anyway, i don't see the issue. How would it be a competitive disadvantage? For the end user, it doesn't matter whether it is VST2 or 3, when it works.Ichad.c wrote:Come to think of it, this also raises some competition policy(anti-trust for ya Americans) issues. As new developers will not have access to VST2 but existing devs will, that would create a competitive disadvantage to new entrants as VST2 demand is still high. Thereby subduing competitive market driven pricing.
-
- KVRAF
- 2654 posts since 13 Mar, 2004
Won't we see any new plugins processing and outputting MIDI (i.e like the Piz MIDI tools, arps, audio to MIDI...) in the future if there's no MDI processing / outputting capabilities in VST3 (as I've read) ?
- KVRAF
- 24403 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
Reaper does.aMUSEd wrote:(not sure how many support sample accurate automation either, or audio input for instruments, or multiple IOs etc).
- KVRian
- 1091 posts since 8 Feb, 2012 from South - Africa
You can verify this @KVR - just search for MIDI+VST3 plugins = 0 results. VST3 can't output MIDI - has trouble receiving it as well(can't even do a program/patch change command because of the way presets work). Even simple MIDI learn isn't really supported plug-in side, yeah - you can find plugs that are VST3 that has MIDI learn, but it is actually a non-standard(i.e. potentially unsafe) hack.No_Use wrote:Won't we see any new plugins processing and outputting MIDI (i.e like the Piz MIDI tools, arps, audio to MIDI...) in the future if there's no MDI processing / outputting capabilities in VST3 (as I've read) ?
- Banned
- 10729 posts since 17 Nov, 2015
Important to who?chk071 wrote:Ok, let's say the important hosts support it then.EvilDragon wrote:Ahem...chk071 wrote:As every host supports VST3 these days anyway, i don't see the issue.
MuLAB
Digital Performer
Live
Maschine
Reason (might as well mention it, since they added VST to it)
Renoise
Audacity
probably some others too(Maybe except Live and Maschine on your list. Reason needs to play catch up for a while now anyway)
My host (not on list) doesnt support vst3. My host is very important to me, vst3 is not.
- KVRAF
- 37377 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
Just with VST3 or is this more a host capability? Reaper unfortunately drops the ball with its crappy preset support for VST3 and AU plugins (it's been a mess for ever and they don't seem motivated to address this).EvilDragon wrote:Reaper does.aMUSEd wrote:(not sure how many support sample accurate automation either, or audio input for instruments, or multiple IOs etc).
- KVRAF
- 24403 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
Audio input for instruments: both VST2 and VST3
Multiple IOs: both VST2 and VST3 (ofc depends on how VST2 was coded but yeah)
Sample accurate automation: VST3 and JS FX, in VST2 this is only possible by dynamically changing plugin's buffer size, I don't know which plugins do this in VST2, if somebody can tell me, I can try testing.
I don't really care about preset support host-side.
Multiple IOs: both VST2 and VST3 (ofc depends on how VST2 was coded but yeah)
Sample accurate automation: VST3 and JS FX, in VST2 this is only possible by dynamically changing plugin's buffer size, I don't know which plugins do this in VST2, if somebody can tell me, I can try testing.
I don't really care about preset support host-side.
- KVRAF
- 37377 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
Unfortunately neither do Reaper devs, given up bothering to ask but it's ridiculous really, especially considering VST3 and AU are both formats where host side support for presets is important.EvilDragon wrote: I don't really care about preset support host-side.
