Zebra3 Info
- KVRAF
- 24405 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
How bout Reaper. 
- KVRAF
- 3361 posts since 31 Dec, 2004 from People's Republic of Minnesota
Hm, comparing the sheer volume of entries in the update logs, it's probably neck and neck.
https://support.apple.com/en-us/ht203718
https://www.reaper.fm/whatsnew.txt
https://support.apple.com/en-us/ht203718
https://www.reaper.fm/whatsnew.txt
-
- KVRist
- 56 posts since 6 Jul, 2008 from Sherwood Park, AB, Canada
I'm sure Zebra 3 will be amazing when it arrives. The mistake that U-he made was to announce they were working on it almost 6 years ago and then get sidetracked by all these other projects. For what's it worth Zebra 2.8 is still one hell of a synth which does set almost impossibly high standards for Zebra 3.
Rainguitar is a writer and musician living in Sherwood Park, Alberta. He is known by his pseudonym "T.K. Boomer" which he uses to write science fiction. Music production is a hobby.
-
- KVRist
- 316 posts since 17 Feb, 2014
Urs wrote:Unlimited size would be overkill IMHO, but up to, say, 256 cycles might be useful. Especially if you prefer external editors like Xfer Serum or Synthtech WaveEdit:_al_ wrote:Here's a thought which may interest you:
In Surge (yep, i still use this), i can load waveforms of (i think) unlimited size, as long as it's a multiple of the size of a single cycle. So if a single cycle is 1048, you can load a vocal sample which is 32 or 64 times that length, and have a waveform that actually sounds like a vocal sample when you scan through it.
Would be a nice little touch for the synth to end all synths
http://synthtech.com/waveedit/
Please, please give an option to the user so that he/she can deside how many single cycles are created when importing/resynthesize a sample, best up to 512.
Why ?
Some sounds are simple structured and without any tonal changes in loudnes and / or pitch; for this sounds 4, 8 or 16 singles cycles are enough. But complex sound effects and vocals may need 256 or even more like 400 or 500 singles cycles to be resynthsized in a high quality manner.
Please give us high quality resynthesis without compromises witch lower down the quality !!!
- KVRAF
- 24405 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
We'll see Zebra 3 much sooner. HL3 probably never. 
-
- KVRist
- 206 posts since 23 Apr, 2006
Do we know yet whether 'much sooner' might mean this year? U-he is on fire at the moment with all the new releases and activity. Updated Hive and Zebra 3 this year would be awesome.
-
- KVRer
- 12 posts since 22 Jul, 2011 from germany
i have not read all 215 pages of over 5 years, so a quick question:
there is already information on the main features and the changes compared to zebra2? what will be different or better?
there is already information on the main features and the changes compared to zebra2? what will be different or better?
sorry, i do not speak english well.
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30180 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Main difference: Editors for Waveforms, MSEGs, ModMappers will use a unified UI control with a lot of really cool tools and features. Each of these modules can operate either spline-based or sample-based. Each will have import/export functionality. These modules will largely be rewritten.con_sordino wrote:i have not read all 215 pages of over 5 years, so a quick question:
there is already information on the main features and the changes compared to zebra2? what will be different or better?
Filters and XMF modules will be united in one kind of filter.
FMOs will very likely become Dual-FM-Oscillators.
Mixers. Loads of mixers for various paradigms and purposes (Vector Synthesis, 4-in-1 Mixers, Matrix Mixers, Scanning Mixers, possibly even Surround-Mixers).
A bunch of West Coast inspired modules (Function Generators, LPGs and other simple modules with broad range of applications)
New paradigms for overall tuning, triggering, arpeggiator, sequencing.
FX Grid will have 4 lanes.
-
- KVRist
- 253 posts since 18 Dec, 2005
Multichannel Zebra?Urs wrote:possibly even Surround-Mixers
If the position in the surround field could be edited and also modulated (via these new unified UI controls?), this would be huge…
-
- KVRer
- 12 posts since 22 Jul, 2011 from germany
@ urs
thanks for the fast and extensive answer! i think it would be a good idea to write this information in the first posting, because if there are another hundred pages, no one will find that answer again.
thanks for the fast and extensive answer! i think it would be a good idea to write this information in the first posting, because if there are another hundred pages, no one will find that answer again.
sorry, i do not speak english well.
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30180 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
-
experimental.crow experimental.crow https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=6258
- KVRAF
- 6895 posts since 9 Mar, 2003 from the bridge of sighs
Urs wrote:Main difference: Editors for Waveforms, MSEGs, ModMappers will use a unified UI control with a lot of really cool tools and features. Each of these modules can operate either spline-based or sample-based. Each will have import/export functionality. These modules will largely be rewritten.con_sordino wrote:i have not read all 215 pages of over 5 years, so a quick question:
there is already information on the main features and the changes compared to zebra2? what will be different or better?
Filters and XMF modules will be united in one kind of filter.
FMOs will very likely become Dual-FM-Oscillators.
Mixers. Loads of mixers for various paradigms and purposes (Vector Synthesis, 4-in-1 Mixers, Matrix Mixers, Scanning Mixers, possibly even Surround-Mixers).
A bunch of West Coast inspired modules (Function Generators, LPGs and other simple modules with broad range of applications)
New paradigms for overall tuning, triggering, arpeggiator, sequencing.
FX Grid will have 4 lanes.

-
- KVRian
- 886 posts since 14 May, 2014
Given how much Hans Zimmer likes Zebra2 and other film-makers use it, some Surround mixing capability of some sort wouldn't be a bad idea! (if I'm thinking of the same thing haha!)Urs wrote:Main difference: Editors for Waveforms, MSEGs, ModMappers will use a unified UI control with a lot of really cool tools and features. Each of these modules can operate either spline-based or sample-based. Each will have import/export functionality. These modules will largely be rewritten.con_sordino wrote:i have not read all 215 pages of over 5 years, so a quick question:
there is already information on the main features and the changes compared to zebra2? what will be different or better?
Filters and XMF modules will be united in one kind of filter.
FMOs will very likely become Dual-FM-Oscillators.
Mixers. Loads of mixers for various paradigms and purposes (Vector Synthesis, 4-in-1 Mixers, Matrix Mixers, Scanning Mixers, possibly even Surround-Mixers).
A bunch of West Coast inspired modules (Function Generators, LPGs and other simple modules with broad range of applications)
New paradigms for overall tuning, triggering, arpeggiator, sequencing.
FX Grid will have 4 lanes.
-
- KVRian
- 969 posts since 5 Sep, 2014 from Heaven
This will be so epic...but I really don't want to get excited. That much stuff has got to take serious time and effort to set up. My control voltage inputs get overloaded just reading that list. 
