You know, I am going to disagree with you on this. I just spent some time working with MSF. As background, I've tried numerous times to fire up MPS to work with it and fairly quickly get bogged down with the workflow. But, I gave MSF a chance because I could see it was quite different in terms of workflow.dmbaer wrote: Fri May 10, 2019 9:06 pmYou are not the target customer for MSF at this point. But in time you may certainly be as well. There will be a very inexpensive LE version which will run sophisticated devices created by individuals who are well-versed in Melda architecture.... [ snip]plexuss wrote: Fri May 10, 2019 8:40 pm I don't really like fiddling around with lots of parameters. I tend to want to put my attention to the over-all music and sound than delving into a deep UI.
. . .
I consider Melda to more on the "engineering" side of the equation than on the "usability" side. The problem is Vjotech thinks he's on the usability side. So, nothing will get better soon. It is what it is...![]()
![]()
Sure enough... it is! I was able to quickly twist a factory patch to my liking, adding a couple extra sound elements including samples from MDrummer, add modifiers and effects and very quickly get something complex but nice sounding.
This is WAY further than I've been able to get with MPS! And I didn't touch modulation or multiparameters or ... all the other Melda junk.
I am thinking that FINALLY Melda came up with something easy to use. I guess it was probably the only way to bring this level of complexiting into the Melda framework - using their panel based approach would have been even worse than MPS.
So, even though I am highly critical of Melda's UI and workflow, I have to say so far I am surprised and impressed with MSF and I don't think that idea that you have to be a Meldaian to use MSF effectively applies.
Oh. And... calm down people.

