Sorry i didn't fully understood your previous post about this, but indeed MUX's PolySynth does not yet support poly pressure to modulate individual voices.ElVincente wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2020 4:06 pm Any hint how to use poly pressure to modulate things within mulab stock instruments ?
M8.6.28 beta
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 13863 posts since 24 Jun, 2008 from Europe
-
- KVRian
- 556 posts since 22 Jun, 2019
Ok thanks the answer!
- KVRAF
- 24415 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
It'd make things more complete if MuLab's instruments could be modulated with poly AT 
- KVRAF
- 7412 posts since 8 Feb, 2003 from London, UK
As start would be a Poly AT to modulation module - pretty much identical to the Note to modulation module.
I guess once a voice inside a PolySynth is triggered by a note on, if the Poly AT note number matched the voice note number, any poly AT going through it would get converted (subject to range) and apply to that note's voice. I guess this is the tricky bit.
Else if the poly AT converter was outside a PolySynth, any poly AT going through it would get converted (subject to range).
I guess once a voice inside a PolySynth is triggered by a note on, if the Poly AT note number matched the voice note number, any poly AT going through it would get converted (subject to range) and apply to that note's voice. I guess this is the tricky bit.
Else if the poly AT converter was outside a PolySynth, any poly AT going through it would get converted (subject to range).
- KVRian
- 1451 posts since 4 Oct, 2012 from Utah
Honestly MUX/Mulab would greatly benefit from MPE support. However, that's a difficult beast to tame as that would require a restructure of the underlying MIDI and event system. Perhaps for M10 or a major 9.X version. Let's not pile too many things onto Jo's plate at once 
Software portfolio
M.N.I.E - soon to be my musical portfolio
Hey, I'm Eurydice(Izzy for short) - she/her
M.N.I.E - soon to be my musical portfolio
Hey, I'm Eurydice(Izzy for short) - she/her
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 13863 posts since 24 Jun, 2008 from Europe
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 13863 posts since 24 Jun, 2008 from Europe
- Banned
- 3490 posts since 6 Sep, 2007 from France
legit, i m not sure other daw allow to load project in an older version (maybe reaper do it...don t remember...)mutools wrote: Thu Sep 17, 2020 10:42 am Projects saved with M9 will certainly not be openable with MuLab 8.x or down.
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 13863 posts since 24 Jun, 2008 from Europe
MuLab 8.6.22 is available in http://www.mutools.com/mulab/beta/
What's changed:
Windows: Replace the current MuLab.exe and MuLab.ID by the new versions.
MacOS: Replace the current MuLab.app by the new version.
What's changed:
- Sometimes monitoring audio was routed directly to audio out instead of Preview Monitor rack. Fixed.
- Streaming audio files with a different samplerate than the current samplerate and with a data format different from 16 bit integer or 32 bit float did not properly work. Fixed.
- New shortcut options for scrolling and zooming editors. See MuLab -> Shortcuts.
- In some cases the full zoom out (aka Overview) editor functions were not working correct from the first time, they needed a double trigger. Fixed.
Windows: Replace the current MuLab.exe and MuLab.ID by the new versions.
MacOS: Replace the current MuLab.app by the new version.
-
- KVRAF
- 5573 posts since 30 May, 2006 from Hollow Earth
Maybe MIDI 2.0 will do more than MPE and perhaps no core changes are needed.dakkra wrote: Wed Sep 09, 2020 6:55 pm Honestly MUX/Mulab would greatly benefit from MPE support. However, that's a difficult beast to tame as that would require a restructure of the underlying MIDI and event system. Perhaps for M10 or a major 9.X version. Let's not pile too many things onto Jo's plate at once![]()
Is that right?
ABEFLGMOPPRRST 
- KVRian
- 1451 posts since 4 Oct, 2012 from Utah
MIDI 2.0 would still need some serious core updates in many DAWs as the packet size increases, not to mention 32 bit data (MIDI 1.0 was 8 bit!!) clear up to 128 bit data. In fact I believe MIDI 2.0 may even support floating point information, which is a whole different ballpark from MIDI 1.0.liquidsound wrote: Sat Sep 26, 2020 5:24 pm Maybe MIDI 2.0 will do more than MPE and perhaps no core changes are needed.
Is that right?
Of course refactoring + a lot of time supporting the new data is possible, but it would require some big updates to the core MIDI engine of any DAW. The most prepared DAWs are those that already support MPE.
Yes, MIDI 2.0 can technically replace MPE. It's going to be a long while before that gets supported widely though. I mean, MPE has been around for a while now and it's still a niche (but very awesome) feature. Studio One only just barely got support for MPE in it's latest version for context.
Software portfolio
M.N.I.E - soon to be my musical portfolio
Hey, I'm Eurydice(Izzy for short) - she/her
M.N.I.E - soon to be my musical portfolio
Hey, I'm Eurydice(Izzy for short) - she/her
