Show your Melda mastering setups?

[Underoath77]

Does anybody use Melda plugins for mastering if so what do you use?

Show em off!

[Hexspa]

I'm using Melda for everything now but haven't dialed in my mastering workflow.

Previously, I used linear EQ into a multiband compressor topped off with a bit of mutiband saturation and then a limiter from different developers. Pretty much, that's what I've done with Melda but I still haven't gone deep enough with these specific Melda tools to feel as comfortable yet.

[mevla]

Good question. I'd be interested too. So far I'm using Melda plugins when mixing, not for mastering.

[ralfrobert]

Good question. I'd be interested too. So far I'm using Melda plugins when mixing, not for mastering.

Some good examples could be helpful. Mastering with pure Melda is a new thing for me, too.

[Tagirijus]

Using one MAutoDynamicEQ for mids, one for side, the MLimiterMB and the MAnalyzer on my mastering chain. So over 50% in my mastering chain is a Melda goodie. (-;

[mevla]

Maybe a video or two on the subject ?

[marzelli]

No. Because for the small clean/neutral corrections I have other tools that more fit my workflow. And because another part of mastering is adding character/giving it a touch, I'd use plugins that introduce this.

[ralfrobert]

Maybe a video or two on the subject ?

I do not know if Chandler is into mastering. However, this might be a wish that could be addressed to him.

[zeep]

MDynamicEQ and/or MAutoDynamicEQ sits on every master chain. Perfect for tweaking, cleaning, cutting and boosting.

I have no experience with MSpectralDynamics, which is i hear even better suited for mastering. If anyone knows a good tutorial for it, please share that too.

[Faiky]

MFreeformAnalogEq
MAutoDynamicEQ
MEqualizerLP
MSpectralDynamics
MStereoProcessor
MDynamicsMB
MLimiterMB
MDynamics
MSaturatorMB
MDistortionMB
MUltraMaximizer
MAnalyzer

I admit that I don't have the perfect mastering ears, for me comparing is essential.
But I don'tknow why I need other plugins than Melda.

[sirmonkey]

I would definitely use MCompare to listen to your work versus whatever reference you use.
That would be a definite for me.

[MeldaProduction]

I personally just us MFreeformEqualizer to match frequency spectrum to the comparison material, potentially MAutoDynamicEq for some manual adjustments, then MTurboComp for some master compression, then say MLimiterX / MLimiterMB as a limiter, and finally MCompare is vital obviously.

[Underoath77]

Once mix revolution comes out I think it will be easier if all the modules are able to fit together?

I personally just us MFreeformEqualizer to match frequency spectrum to the comparison material, potentially MAutoDynamicEq for some manual adjustments, then MTurboComp for some master compression, then say MLimiterX / MLimiterMB as a limiter, and finally MCompare is vital obviously.

[Underoath77]

I personally just us MFreeformEqualizer to match frequency spectrum to the comparison material, potentially MAutoDynamicEq for some manual adjustments, then MTurboComp for some master compression, then say MLimiterX / MLimiterMB as a limiter, and finally MCompare is vital obviously.

[pumafred]

Once mix revolution comes out I think it will be easier if all the modules are able to fit together?

I personally just us MFreeformEqualizer to match frequency spectrum to the comparison material, potentially MAutoDynamicEq for some manual adjustments, then MTurboComp for some master compression, then say MLimiterX / MLimiterMB as a limiter, and finally MCompare is vital obviously.

It will be a screen with a single button: "Mix". And it will all be done.