I understand your point of view.Tj Shredder wrote: Mon May 16, 2022 2:36 pmOk, I didn‘t know, I follow Linux issues only occasionally out of curiosity…kurt008 wrote: Mon May 16, 2022 2:29 pmThis change did not only concern the Beta!Tj Shredder wrote: Mon May 16, 2022 2:27 pmHey its a beta, you should expect exactly that. If you don‘t want to waist time on this kind of issues, simply stick with stable releases…kurt008 wrote: Mon May 16, 2022 2:20 pm I'm not happy about such "surprising solutions", because they cost lots of unnecessary time which I urgently need elsewhere. Hopefully they learn from this miss.
I hope you learn from this miss and read the warnings which come with betas…
My criticism targets this "surprise" and the total lack of testing that change, not the change in general. I expect a software developer, who expects me to pay regularly money for such a development to run such checks instead of re-functioning the users as Alpha-/Beta-Testers. If there's no further testing targeted after compiling, then I'm away from all these experiments. Beta is commonly known as a state, in which the roughest errors are already eliminated. And errors, which concern the system directory tree and permission issues I personally see quite rough, as they concern the contact of the DAW to the system instead of its function as DAW at all - basically!
So as stated: That was an Alpha, not a Beta - and for sure no Pre-Release.
