Intel Core i9-12900HX - anyone tried it?
-
- KVRAF
- 35725 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
That's a forelast generation mid tier desktop CPU you are comparing to the current highest end of laptop CPU's.
The fact that it doesn't perform much worse proves what I wrote.
The fact that it doesn't perform much worse proves what I wrote.
Last edited by chk071 on Sun Jul 24, 2022 10:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 45 posts since 1 Nov, 2020
Thanks I think that's what I'll do(:chk071 wrote: Sun Jul 24, 2022 10:09 am I would also just go for it, if you don't have any budget limits or whatever. It looks like you want to be mobile, so, a desktop PC just won't fit. I'd just get a laptop with the HX then, as it seems to be about the best you can get in laptops at the moment.
Let's put it like this: Laptops are yester-yester-yesteryears premium desktops.astralprojection wrote: Sun Jul 24, 2022 9:14 am you dont seem to understand, that yesteryears premium desktops are todays laptops.There's a lot between them.
That's unfortunately what the Mac guys don't get. Their M1 doesn't stand a chance against high end desktop CPU's. Obviously. But, "obvious" doesn't seem to be the Apple fans' forte.
Captain Obvious isn't a Mac user, that's for sure.
Please correct me if I'm wrong but I think there's still a big difference between the M1 and the mobile i9, right? I mean the big advantage of the M1 is the power efficiency, but performance wise it doesn't come close
-
- KVRAF
- 35725 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Yes, the power efficiency will be a lot better, as the CPU is ARM based. Performance wise, I'm sure the Intel will do better. Dunno though. Hard to compare when they don't run the same OS.sir-haver wrote: Sun Jul 24, 2022 10:28 am Please correct me if I'm wrong but I think there's still a big difference between the M1 and the mobile i9, right? I mean the big advantage of the M1 is the power efficiency, but performance wise it doesn't come close
-
astralprojection astralprojection https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=443661
- Banned
- 361 posts since 30 Jun, 2019
thats fair, i always thought the i5 x600k series to be a gamers wet budget dream, and whatever works in gaming certainly works for production, even using dozens of tracks at 192k.chk071 wrote: Sun Jul 24, 2022 10:27 am That's a forelast generation mid tier desktop CPU you are comparing to the current highest end of laptop CPU's.
The fact that it doesn't perform much worse proves what I wrote.
so really i think we say the same thing but from different perspectives.
either way the 12900hx will make anyone happy for a very long time!
- KVRAF
- 2197 posts since 8 Jan, 2005
"the Mac guys"? M1 is 2 years old tech. Obviously, recent tech is prone to be faster.chk071 wrote: Sun Jul 24, 2022 10:09 amThat's unfortunately what the Mac guys don't get. Their M1 doesn't stand a chance against high end desktop CPU's. Obviously. But, "obvious" doesn't seem to be the Apple fans' forte
MacMini M2 Pro …… MacOS Tahoe ……… Reason 14
-
- KVRAF
- 1524 posts since 29 Oct, 2015 from Jupiter 8
the PC guy(s) in this case doesn't seem to grasp that Apple Silicon is actually high end, just for the mobile / laptop sector.
Try putting this 12900 into an iPad competitor, or an ultrabook and see how it will fare.
And i don't mean just performance wise, which surely will suck too as it will have to throttle like mad, but also battery life and noise floor because of the fan(s) and bulkiness, as it will also need a much bigger battery and more room for cooling in order to be not completely useless.
I'm sure this is going to be a hit and Apple is already shivering
Try putting this 12900 into an iPad competitor, or an ultrabook and see how it will fare.
And i don't mean just performance wise, which surely will suck too as it will have to throttle like mad, but also battery life and noise floor because of the fan(s) and bulkiness, as it will also need a much bigger battery and more room for cooling in order to be not completely useless.
I'm sure this is going to be a hit and Apple is already shivering
The GAS is always greener on the other side!
-
- KVRAF
- 35725 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
I read in black and white here and elsewhere that some people think that the M1 was the fastest CPU ever.FapFilter wrote: Sun Jul 24, 2022 6:26 pm the PC guy(s) in this case doesn't seem to grasp that Apple Silicon is actually high end, just for the mobile / laptop sector.
Anyway, not relevant to this thread or the OP's decision.
- KVRAF
- 2197 posts since 8 Jan, 2005
It was. At the day it was released and for some months after that.chk071 wrote: Sun Jul 24, 2022 6:43 pmI read in black and white here and elsewhere that some people think that the M1 was the fastest CPU ever.
If raw speed is concerned, it was overtaken. performance per wattage, though.... nah. still on top. way on top
MacMini M2 Pro …… MacOS Tahoe ……… Reason 14
-
- KVRAF
- 35725 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
- KVRAF
- 2197 posts since 8 Jan, 2005
indeed. It was you, though, who pulled the Apple card.
MacMini M2 Pro …… MacOS Tahoe ……… Reason 14
