Maybe better described as a time wise ease-in and ease-out? When I apply an S-shaped transformation curve to the modwheel helps a little, but I miss a lag, smothing in the time domain.
- Is there a way to achieve this in MSF?
[Solved] Is there a way to get a "time smoothed" or "lazy" response from the modwheel in MSF etc?
-
- KVRist
- 324 posts since 17 Apr, 2013 from Gothenburg, Sweden
Last edited by jan-sandahl on Tue Aug 27, 2024 8:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Win 11 | Latest Reaper | MCompleteBundle
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 324 posts since 17 Apr, 2013 from Gothenburg, Sweden
I had a feeling... It's already in MSF. I didn't look around sufficiently the first time. 
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Win 11 | Latest Reaper | MCompleteBundle
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122 - KVRAF
- 14325 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
In the new version there will be additional perks for postprocessing modulation 
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 324 posts since 17 Apr, 2013 from Gothenburg, Sweden
Weee! 
On the topic of modulation...
How can I combine two in sync (say) stepped LFOs, so that one runs eight 8ths, and the other runs nine 8ths (in length)? I don't know how to achieve this polymetric type nested (fun!) modulations.
They are really cool and it would be awesome to either learn how in the existing condition of MSF, or to have it later on! Or a real SEQ mod source with variable SEQ length capability.
On the topic of modulation...
How can I combine two in sync (say) stepped LFOs, so that one runs eight 8ths, and the other runs nine 8ths (in length)? I don't know how to achieve this polymetric type nested (fun!) modulations.
They are really cool and it would be awesome to either learn how in the existing condition of MSF, or to have it later on! Or a real SEQ mod source with variable SEQ length capability.
Win 11 | Latest Reaper | MCompleteBundle
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- 14325 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
Well, if I get it correctly, then you do that simply by using both mod sources in the per-voice per-parameter mod matrix. Or you can use the new "Postprocess" modulation sources.