It's possible that disgruntled software guy didn't turn off automatic refunds (I still don't know whether they work).IaES wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2024 10:37 am It just occurred to me that maybe DR did not want it to end this way.
...
Maybe they layed off the wrong guys.Maybe they kept a few sales guys in suits but layed off the software engineers that kept the system working.
Or maybe a disgruntled software guy threw a spanner in the works before leaving.
But another theory is also possible. Barry L. Kasoff doesn't only deal with shutting down business. As listed on his company site, they also restructure, etc. So maybe his idea was not to bankrupt DR, after all DR Gmbh was bringing in 5-6M per year according to the latest financial reports we have. Barry's modus operandi is probably to lay off anyone that can, squeeze suppliers with extra fees and increase payment terms to essentially get an interest-free cash infusion. Esentially like with new contract terms we got. And that "squeeze vendors dry" model might work in industries where suppliers depend on a company and can't leave just like that. Like if you're selling physical products to a supermarket chain, if that chain changes their terms you have to accept them, at least short term since it's hard, expensive and maybe even impossible to find alternative. If he doesn't understand our industry maybe he thought it would play the same way. He underestimated how quickly we can move to another payment processor. His gamble just turned wrong when we left platform en masse in October. That maybe explains pointing new director on 1st October, their plan backfired and now they have to switch to "steal" mode, while attempting to not get criminally liable doing so.
